The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Variable speed digital ed 5 wiley mill

Manufactured by Thomas Scientific

The Variable Speed Digital ED-5 Wiley Mill is a laboratory equipment designed for grinding and milling a variety of samples. It features variable speed control and digital display for precise control of the milling operation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using variable speed digital ed 5 wiley mill

1

Feed Sample Analysis and Amino Acid Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Feed samples were taken directly from five feeders per dietary treatment at the end of each phase, pooled within phase and treatment, and homogenized before being stored at −20 °C. Diets were ground to 1 mm particle size using a Wiley Mill (Variable Speed Digital ED-5 Wiley Mill; Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ), dried to a constant weight at 60 °C, and analyzed in duplicate for dry matter (DM; method 930.15; AOAC, 2007 ), ash (method 942.05; AOAC, 2007 ), acid-hydrolyzed ether extract (aEE; method 2003.06; AOAC, 2007 ), and nitrogen (N; method 990.03; AOAC, 2007 ; TruMac; LECO Corp., St. Joseph, MI). An ethylenediaminetetraacetate sample (9.56% N; determined to have 9.54 ± 0.05% N) was used for standard calibration and crude protein was calculated as N × 6.25. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) for DM, ash, aEE, and N was 0.8%, 1.0%, 4.8%, and 0.9%, respectively. Diet samples were analyzed for total amino acids at the Agricultural Experiment Station Chemical Laboratories (University of Missouri, Columbia, MO). The SID levels of amino acids were calculated using the assayed total amino acid values and the SID coefficient for each ingredient in the formulation (NRC, 2012 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Feed Analysis for Swine Nutrition Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A feed sample (at least 300 g) was collected after each batch of feed was manufactured at the Iowa State University Swine Nutrition Research Farm (Ames, IA) and stored at −20 °C until further analysis. A composite sample (200 g) of each phase was made from equal amounts of each batch and utilized for feed chemical analysis. Feed samples were ground using a Wiley Mill (Variable Speed Digital ED-5 Wiley Mill; Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ) to obtain a particle size of 1 mm. Proximate analysis of the ground composite sample was performed in duplicate to obtain gross energy using an isoperibolic bomb calorimeter (model 6200; Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL) and acid hydrolyzed ether extract via a SoxCap hydrolyzer (model SC 247) and a Soxtec fat extractor (model 255; Foss, Eden Prairie, MN; method 968; AOAC, 2007). Standards used for calibration gross energy analysis were achieved using benzoic acid (Parr Instrument Co.; 6,318 kcal GE/kg).
All feed samples were analyzed in triplicate for vitamin A as retinyl acetate at Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory via a protocol that was developed in-house (protocol #9.2020, unpublished).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Nutrient Analysis of Ground Diets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diets were ground to 1 mm particle size with a Wiley Mill (Variable Speed Digital ED-5 Wiley Mill; Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ) and analyzed in duplicate for DM (method 930.15 [AOAC, 2007 ]), acid-hydrolyzed ether extract (aEE; method 2003.06; [AOAC, 2007 ]), and N (method 990.03 [AOAC, 2007 ]; TruMac; LECO Corp., St. Joseph, MI). An ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid sample (9.56% N) was used as the standard for calibration and was determined to contain 9.55 ± 0.01% N. Crude protein was calculated as N × 6.25. Gross energy was determined in duplicate using an isoperibolic bomb calorimeter (model 6200; Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL). Benzoic acid (6,318 kcal GE/kg) was used as the standard for calibration and was determined to contain 6,319 ± 0.8 kcal GE/kg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Amino Acid and Energy Analysis of Diet Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diet samples were ground through a 1 mm screen using a Wiley Mill (Variable Speed Digital ED-5 Wiley Mill; Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ). Ground samples were submitted to the University of Missouri Agricultural Experimental Station Laboratories (Columbia, MO) for complete amino acid profiling using cation-exchange chromatography coupled with postcolumn ninhydrin derivatization and quantification (method 982.30 E and 988.15; AOAC, 2006 ).
Feed samples were also analyzed for gross energy at Iowa State University using an isoperibolic bomb calorimeter (model 6200; Parr Instruments Co., Moline, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proximal Analysis and Vitamin A Quantification in Feed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A feed sample (at least 300 g) was taken from each mixed batch and stored at −20 °C for later analysis. A pooled composite feed sample (approximately 200 g total) was made from equal amounts of all batches. The composite sample was ground to 1 mm particle size (Variable Speed Digital ED-5 Wiley Mill; Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ). The proximal analysis of the pooled ground samples was analyzed in duplicate for gross energy, dry matter (method 930.15; AOAC, 2007 ), ash (method 942.05; AOAC, 2007 ), and nitrogen (method 990.03; AOAC, 2007 ; TruMac; LECO Corp., St. Joseph, MI). Nitrogen analysis was calibrated using an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid sample (LECO Corp.; 9.56% nitrogen). Crude protein was then calculated by taking the nitrogen × 6.25. An isoperibolic bomb calorimeter (model 6200; Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL) was utilized to determine gross energy. Calibration was achieved using a benzoic acid (Parr Instrument Co.; 6,318 kcal GE/kg) as a standard.
Feed samples were submitted to the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for vitamin A analysis (in-house protocol #9.2020). The vitamin A metabolite measured in the analysis was retinyl acetate. Analysis for retinyl palmitate was performed in triplicate, and the mean reported herein (Table 2) for the vitamin A supplemented diet and the control diet.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Dietary Impact on Pig Digesta Sampling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diet samples were collected at the time of mixing, thoroughly homogenized, and carefully subsampled. Fresh fecal subsamples were obtained from each pig via grab sampling. Ileal samples were collected by attaching a 207-mL plastic bag (Whirl-Pak; Nasco, Fort Atkinson, WI) to the opened cannula with a cable tie. Bags were removed once they were filled with digesta or at least every 30 min for 8 h per collection day. A jejunal sample was collected once per hour for 6 h post feeding. All samples were immediately stored at –20 °C to avoid degradation. Prior to being assayed, fecal samples were thawed, homogenized, subsampled, and oven-dried in a convection oven at 60 °C until a constant weight was reached. Ileal and jejunal samples were thawed, homogenized, subsampled, and lyophilized. Diets and dried ileal, jejunal, and fecal subsamples were ground in a Wiley Mill (Variable Speed Digital ED-5 Wiley Mill; Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ) through a 1-mm screen and stored in desiccators to maintain a constant dry matter (DM) content.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Feed Sample Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A feed sample (approximately 200 g) was taken from each mixed batch by taking a sample dispensed from the bin at the start of the new batch and stored at −20 °C for later analysis. Feed samples from all batches of each diet were pooled (roughly 200 g total), ground to 1 mm particle size, using a Wiley Mill (Variable Speed Digital ED-5 Wiley Mill; Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ). Ground samples were analyzed in duplicate for gross energy, dry matter (method 930.15; AOAC, 2007 ), ash (method 942.05; AOAC, 2007 ), and nitrogen (method 990.03; AOAC, 2007 ; TruMac; LECO Corp., St. Joseph, MI). For calibration, an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid sample (LECO Corp.; 9.56% nitrogen) was used as the standard. Crude protein was calculated as nitrogen × 6.25. Gross energy was determined using an isoperibolic bomb calorimeter (model 6200; Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL). Benzoic acid (Parr Instrument Co.; 6,318 kcal GE/kg) was used as the standard for calibration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!