The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using anti hla dr

1

Characterization of Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of DC, the following monoclonal antibodies were used: anti-CD14, anti-HLA-DR, anti-CD80, anti-CD86, anti-CD83, and isotype controls (all from Miltenyi). 1 × 105 cells/tube were stained with fluorochrome conjugated mAbs (BD) and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. All labeled cells were analyzed on a FACS Calibur (BD). Data analyses were conducted using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Monocyte Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For surface immunophenotype marker staining, the cells we resuspended in autoMACS® Rinsing Solution (1 × 105 cells in 100 µL) with 1% BSA and stained with anti-CD16 (A07766, Beckman Coulter), anti-CD14 (130-110-518, Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD45 (A07785, Beckman Coulter), anti-CD206 (130-095-131, Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD86 (130-116-160, Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD163 (130-097-630, Miltenyi Biotec), anti-HLA-DR (130-111-790, Miltenyi Biotec), CD40 (130-110-947, Miltenyi Biotec), CD80 (130-117-683, Miltenyi Biotec) and anti-CX3CR1 (12-6099-42, eBioscience). The analysis was carried out on the FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, USA) with the CellQuest software. In each measurement, 10,000 cells were analyzed. The gating strategy included selection of the monocyte population on dot-plot of forward (FSC) and side scatter (SSC), as well as gating on SSC vs CD45 flow dot-plot with further gating on CD14 vs HLA-DR dot-plot to exclude B lymphocytes21 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation of Naive CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Memory CD4+ T cells and non-CD4+ T cells were depleted from PBMCs by incubation with CD45RO, CD8, CD14, CD15, CD16, CD19, CD25, CD34, CD36, CD56, CD123, anti-TCRγ/δ, anti-HLA-DR, and CD235a (glycophorin A) antibodies (Miltenyi Biotech, Sunnyvale, CA). Naive CD4+ T cells were isolated using negative selection magnetic bead methods (Miltenyi Biotech, Sunnyvale, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phenotypic Analysis of Surface DCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry analysis of surface DC phenotype, we used the following monoclonal antibodies (mAb): FITC-labeled anti-CD1c (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD14, anti-CD16 and anti-HLA I (all from Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA, USA), Alexa Fluor 488-labeled anti-CD1a and anti-CCR7 (both Biolegend). PE-labeled antibodies included: anti-CD11b, anti-CD11c (both Biolegend), anti-CD80, anti-CD86, anti-DC-SIGN, (all Biolegend), and anti-HLA DR (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany).
DCs differentiated in Cellgenix® DC GMP medium (Cellgenix GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) were harvested and collected by centrifugation. Before staining, the cells were washed twice in DPBS in all cases. Antibody was added and the cells were incubated for 15 min in the dark, then washed twice and resuspended in 2% paraformaldehyde (PHA). Samples were analyzed on a FACSCalibur system (BD biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Data were analyzed with CellQuest software (BD biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation of Primary Human Monocytes and Naive CD4+ T-Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary human monocytes were isolated from buffy coats from healthy donors (Sanquin, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). Before sample collection, a written consent was obtained. Buffy coats were diluted 1:1 with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone™ Fetal Bovine Serum, Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) and loaded onto Greiner Bio-One™ LeucoSEP™ Polypropylene Tubes to obtain peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). After being washed, the cells were diluted in MACS buffer, and a CD14 microbead kit was used to isolate the monocytes according to the manufacturer's protocol (Miltenyi Biotec, Leiden, The Netherlands). Naive CD4+ T-cells were isolated from the flow through using a negative selection. A naive CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit, containing a cocktail of biotinylated CD45RO, CD8, CD14, CD15, CD16, CD19, CD25, CD34, CD36, CD56, CD123, anti-TCRγ/δ, anti-HLA-DR, and CD235a (glycophorin A) antibodies (Miltenyi Biotec, Leiden, The Netherlands), was used. All cells were frozen in 1:1 FBS and FBS with 20% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at −80°C until further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDSCs were isolated from PBMCs by HLA-Dr negative selection and followed by CD33 positive selection, using anti-HLA-Dr and anti-CD33 antibody-coated magnetic beads according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotech, Germany). Briefly, 1.0×107 cells in 80μl of PBS buffer were incubated with 20μl of HLA-Dr MicroBead Cocktail. The sample was mixed well and incubated at 2-8°C for 10min. The mixture was transferred to the separation columns (MACS MS column; Miltenyi Biotech). The effluent was collected and incubated with 20μl of CD33+ MicroBead Cocktail. The cells were washed with 1ml of PBS buffer and the HLA-Dr- CD33+ cells were collected. Purity of the separated cells was >90% by flow cytometry. CD3+ T cells were also isolated as stated above using Pan T magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotech). CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells were isolated from PBMCs of healthy controls using CD4+ and CD8+ MicroBeads respectively (Miltenyi Biotech, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometric Analysis of DC Phenotype

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis of surface DC phenotype using flow cytometry, the following monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were used: FITC-labeled anti-CD14 and anti-HLA I (both from Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA), Alexa Fluor 488-labeled anti-CCR7 (Biolegend, CA, USA), PE-labeled anti-CD40, anti-CD80, anti-CD83, anti-CD86, and anti-HLA DR (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany).
The DCs, which were differentiated in Cellgenix® DC GMP medium (Cellgenix GmbH, Freiburg, Germany), were harvested and collected through centrifugation. Prior to cell staining, the cells were washed two times in DPBS in all instances. The appropriate antibody was added, and the cells were incubated in the dark for 15 min. Subsequently, the cells were washed twice and suspended in 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Analysis of the samples was performed using a FACSCalibur system (Becton Dickinson, Inc.), and the acquired data were analyzed using the CellQuest software (BD biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!