The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hr208

Manufactured by Cressington
Sourced in United Kingdom

The HR208 is a laboratory equipment designed for high-resolution analysis. It provides precise measurement capabilities for various applications within the scientific research and testing domains.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using hr208

1

SEM Imaging of Polymer Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were recorded on a Zeiss LEO 1530 (FE-SEM, Schottky-field-emission cathode; in-lens and SE 2 detector) at the Bavarian Polymer Institute (BPI, KeyLab Electron and Optical Microscopy) in Bayreuth. An accelerating voltage of 2 kV was used. The samples were sputtered with platinum (1.3 nm) prior to SEM imaging, using a sputter coater (Cressington HR208) with a thickness controller (Cressington MTM20).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Corn Bran and Digesta

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images depicting the topography of corn bran and jejunal and ileal digesta samples from HF, XY, and AX at each period were captured using field emission SEM at the Roy J. Carter High Resolution Microscopy Facility (Iowa State University, Ames, IA). Samples were uniformly mounted on circular aluminum stubs with double-sided carbon tape and coated with platinum to a maximum thickness of 8 nm using a high-resolution sputter coater adapted with a high-resolution thickness controller (HR 208, Cressington Scientific Instruments Ltd, Watford, UK). Samples were examined with an ultra-low voltage cold cathode field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4800, Hitachi, Krefeld, Germany) at a voltage of 10.0 kV. The corresponding dietary treatment and period for a given sample were blinded to the technician imaging the samples. Multiple representative pictures were captured at 100x magnification, and images were scaled with an associated software (4800 FE-SEM Hitachi Internal Software, Hitachi; Krefeld, Germany). A representative picture of each dietary treatment for each period was selected by a research technician blinded to dietary treatments and experimental hypotheses to avoid confirmation bias in selecting a representative image.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Polymers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron micrographs of synthesised polymers were acquired sputtering a thin layer of Au (20 nm) on the films using a sputter coater (CRESSINGTON HR208). A field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) ULTRAPLUS, (Zeiss Company, Germany) equipped with OXFORD detector for EDX (EHT = 10.00 kV, aperture size = 30.00 µm, detector = EDT) was used to detect secondary electrons onto dry samples operating under vacuum conditions at 61.90 KX (Azo-tz-PEDOT:PSS), 59.79 KX (N3-PEDOT:PSS) and 57.64 KX (PEDOT:PSS) of magnifications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Dry Powder Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micrographs of the dry samples were taken with a FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 instrument. Images presented were taken with secondary electrons and an acceleration voltage of 5.00 kV. The samples were mounted on a sticky carbon tab. With a Cressington HR208, a thin layer of about 2.5 nm of Pt/Pd (80–20 wt%) was sputtered on this stub, which was placed on the NanoSEM. A JEOL JEM 2200FS FEG transmission electron microscope was operated at 200 keV. The dry powder was dispersed in water and dropped on a copper TEM grid covered by a carbon film.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fungal Culture Preparation for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fungal cultures were grown in 96-well plates as described above for 24 hr, washed with phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH = 7.4), and then fixed in 4% formaldehyde with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.05M sodium cacodylate (pH 6.5) at room temperature for 2 hr and then overnight at 4°C. The following day, samples were washed with sodium cacodylate (0.1M, pH = 7.4), and post-fixed with an osmium/tannic acid solution (1% OsO4 and 0.1% tannic acid in 0.1M sodium cacodylate, pH = 7.4). Samples were then dehydrated through exposure to a graded ethanol series (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95, and 3 × 100%), critical point dried using a Tousimis CPD Autosamdri 815B, and mounted onto a 12.5 mm Al SEM pin stub using a microporous sample holder. Samples were sputter coated with 10 nM AuPd in a Cressington HR208 and images were acquired on a S2600 VP scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!