The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Q exactive hf spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Q Exactive HF spectrometer is a high-resolution, accurate-mass (HR/AM) hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. It is capable of performing full-scan high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using q exactive hf spectrometer

1

Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HA-affinity purification samples were briefly separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and excised into a low molecular weight (<55 kDa) and a high molecular weight (>55 kDa) gel slice. Tryptic digest and peptide elution were described before (34 (link)). Samples were treated as described in Supplemental Methods and were directly injected into a Q Exactive HF spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). A 90 min gradient of 2–95% buffer B (80% acetonitrile, 0.5% formic acid) at a constant flow rate was used to elute peptides. Mass spectra were acquired in a data-dependent fashion using a top15 method for peptide sequencing. Raw data was processed with MaxQuant Version 1.6.3.3 using default parameters (35 (link)). MS/MS spectra were searched against a Chlamydonomas database (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html) concatenated with reverse copies of all sequences and a list of amino acid sequences of frequently observed contaminants (minimal peptide length = 7, minimal peptide = 1 (razor or unique), PSM FDR = 0.01). Label-free quantification (minimal ratio count = 2) and ‘match between runs’ (matching time window = 0.7 min, alignment time window = 20 min) was enabled (35 (link)). All raw files, MaxQuant results and parameter files are available at ProteomeXchange (see Data Availability).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Aconitine-induced Mitochondrial Proteome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two separate LC-MS/MS-based proteomics analyses were performed in control and 5 μM aconitine-treated groups. In brief, the mitochondrial protein extracts were dissolved in lysis buffer, and the concentrations were determined by Bradford assay. Then lyophilized proteins from the two groups were redissolved in the solution (50 μl) containing equal ratios of urea (8 M) and DTT (20 mM) and incubated in a water bath for 4 h at 37°C. An equal volume of IAA (100 mM) was added to each group and then incubated for 1 h in dark. Next, NH4HCO3 (50 mM) buffer was added to the samples until the concentration of urea became 1 M. Subsequently, trypsin was added at a 1:50 mass ratio of trypsin: protein and digested at 37°C overnight. Finally, the digested peptides were freeze-dried and redissolved with 0.1% formic acid. The prepared sample was analyzed by a Q Exactive HF spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled online with a nanoflow liquid chromatography system (Easy-nLC 1200, Thermo Fisher Scientific). All data were acquired using Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After LC-MS/MS analysis, protein identification was performed by searching against UniProt databases using Mascot software (Matrix Science, London, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Sperm Protein Abundance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data acquired by the iTRAQ analysis were further verified by quantifying the abundance of 6 selected proteins using PRM. The signature peptides for the target proteins were defined according to the iTRAQ data and unique peptide sequences were selected for the PRM analysis. PRM analysis was carried out on the Q-Exactive HF spectrometer (Thermo, USA). The raw data obtained were analyzed using the Proteome Discoverer and the FDR was set at 1% for peptides. The resulting MS data were processed by using Skyline (version 3.5.0, RRID: SCR_014080).
PRDX6 antibody (Abmart, Cat No T56784, China) was used to quantify the PRDX6 abundance of GFE and PFE sperms, and β-Tublin antibody (Abmart, Cat No M30109, RRID: AB_2916070) was used as control. Goat anti-rabbit mouse IgG-HRP was used as the secondary antibody (Abmart, Cat No M21003, RRID: AB_2920649). Western blot was performed as described previously [13 (link)]. Considering the antibodies used were unspecific for buffalo, we cut the membrane prior to hybridization to remove the nonspecific blots. Quantification employed ImageJ (NIH Image J system, USA, RRID: SCR_003070) and the data were normalized to β-Tublin. Each loading sample for WB analysis consisted of three mixed ejaculates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Histone PTM Analysis by PRM-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were resuspended in 17 μl of 0.1% Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFA). A total of 5.0 μl were injected into a nano-HPLC device (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UltimateNano3000) using a gradient from 4% solvent B to 90% solvent B (solvent A 0.1% Formic Acid (FA) in water, solvent B 80% Acetonitrile (ACN), 0.1% FA in water) over 90 min at a flow rate of 300 nl min−1 in a C18 Ultra-High Pressure Liquid chromatography (UHPLC) column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 164534). Data were acquired in parallel-reaction monitoring (PRM)-positive mode using a Q Exactive HF spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to identify and quantify specific N-terminal peptides of histone H3 and histone H4 proteins and their PTMs. One survey MS1 scan and nine MS2 acquisitions from the precursor m/z value in the inclusion list was performed. MS1 spectra were acquired in the m/z range 250–1,600 with a resolution of 30,000 at m/z 400 (AGC target of 3 × 106). PRM spectra were acquired with resolution 15,000 to a target value of 2 × 105, maximum injection time (IT) 60 ms, isolation 2 window 0.7 m/z and fragmented at 27% normalized collision energy. Typical mass spectrometric conditions were as follows: spray voltage, 1.5 kV; no sheath and auxiliary gas flow; heated capillary temperature, 250 °C. MS histone PTM analysis and quantification are detailed in the Supplementary Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Analysis of 2D Immunoblot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spots recognized in the 2D immunoblot were excised from the gel, digested with trypsin, analysed by LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry) in a Q Exactive HF spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and identified with Proteome Discoverer software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the Proteomic Unit of the Complutense University (Madrid, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Venom Protein Fractionation and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, 100 µg of venom protein samples was placed in a centrifuge tube with 5 μL 1 M DTT and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, 20 μL indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) was added at room temperature and the tube was kept in the dark for 1 h. Samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was removed. After addition of 100 μL UA, samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was removed again, after which 100 μL 50 mM NH4HCO3, was added, followed by centrifugation and removal of the supernatant once more. Trypsin was added at a 50:1 protein/enzyme ratio, followed by hydrolysis at 37 ºC for more than 12 h for liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry analysis.
Second, the samples were separated using high-pressure liquid chromatography (Ultimate 3000, Thermo Scientific, USA) with a C18 trap column (C18 1.9 m 0.15 × 120 mm). The gradient was composed of 0.1% methanoic acid (A) and 0.1% methanoic acid/80% acetonitrile (B), and the linear gradient was set as follows: 0–8 min for 94–91% A, 8–24 min for 91–86% A, 24–60 min for 86–68% A, 60–75 min for 68–32% A, and 75–80 min for 32–5% A. The flow rate was 600 nL.min-1. Finally, each separated sample was analyzed with a Q-Exactive HF spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA); see Fig. S16 for parameters. The acquired datasets (.raw files) were analyzed using MaxQuant and the built-in Andromeda search engine against the UniProt database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!