The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hplc dad

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The HPLC-DAD (High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detector) is an analytical instrument used for the separation, identification, and quantification of various chemical compounds. It combines the power of high-performance liquid chromatography with the versatility of a diode array detector, enabling the simultaneous detection of multiple analytes in a single run.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using hplc dad

1

Extraction and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solvents (formic acid, water, acetonitrile, methanol) used for extraction and HPLC–DAD–ESI-MS and HPLC–DAD were of LC–MS and HPLC grade and were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). HPLC reference standards, rosmarinic acid (99%), and luteolin 7-O-glucoside (98.9%), were purchased from Phytolab (Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany). All the chemical reagents used for the CBMN assay are reported in our previous work [58 (link)] (see Supplementary Materials Section S3.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC-DAD Analysis of R. crispus Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the method of Yahyaoui et al. [24 (link)] with a C18 column (25 cm × 4.6 mm × 5 μm), the different extracts of R. crispus were analyzed on analytical HPLC-DAD (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Using a mobile phase composed of acidified water (pH = 2.65) (solvent A) and water/acetonitrile (20 : 80 v/v, pH = 2.65) (solvent B), elution was performed at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The limit of detection (LOD) of the method was defined from 0.01–0.1 mg/L. The gradient proceeds as follows: from 0.1% to 30% B in 35 minutes, from 30% to 50% B in 5 minutes, from 50% to 99.9% B in 5 minutes, and finally from 99.9% to 0.1% B in 15 minutes. To detect most compounds, all samples were prepared at the same concentration (20 mg/mL). After injecting twenty microliters (20 μL) of each sample, they were detected at 280 nm. The phenolic compounds can be determined by comparing the retention time of the unknowns with the standards with known retention time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Intracellular Uridine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HepG2 cells were seeded in 24-well plates (5 × 10 4 cells/well) and treated with selected doses of CPBMF65 (90 µM) and Urd (5 and 10 mM). After 48 h of treatment, counts were made using trypan blue (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and each group was adjusted to the amount of 7 × 10 5 cells. Cells were washed three times with PBS and disrupted by sonication. The intracellular uridine was then quantified through high performance liquid chromatography with a diode array detector (HPLC-DAD; Thermo Scientific, USA). A calibration curve was made from 0.625 to 20 µM with an uridine standard (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 30 min in Amicon microtubes (3 kDa molecular weight cutoff). The samples (100 µL) were injected into a Sephasil Peptide C18 ST 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, 100 Å column (GE HealthCare, USA) maintained at 20 °C, and the flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/min with a mobile phase of 0.1% acetic acid. Under these conditions, the retention time of uridine was 31.7 min with a linear relationship (r > 0.99) between the peak area and uridine concentration, normalized by the saline group concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Chloroplast Pigments in Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lyophilized dry leaf powder (0.1 g) was homogenized with 100% cold acetone (3 mL) using Ultra-Turrax homogenizer for 30 s. Samples were then centrifuged at 11,500× g and 4 °C for 10 min, filtered through Minisart (SRP 15, PTFE) polyamide filters (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Göttingen, Germany) and transferred to vials. The entire extraction process was performed in dim light.
Chloroplast pigments were analyzed using HPLC-DAD (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA) according to the method described in Vosnjak, et al. [20 (link)]. The content of each compound was calculated using corresponding external standards and expressed as µg g−1 dry weight (DW).
The following sums of compounds identified in our study were expressed as total chlorophylls (sum of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b), total carotenoids (sum of lutein, β-carotene, neoxanthin, violaxanthin (V), antheraxanthin (A) and zeaxanthin (Z)), xanthophyll cycle pigments (VAZ; sum of V, A and Z). In addition, de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle (AZ/VAZ; ratio between the sum of A and Z and the sum of V, A and Z) and the chlorophyll a/b ratio (ratio between chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b) were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Carotenoid Extraction and HPLC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carotenoids were extracted according to the method described by Mikulic-Petkovsek et al. [56 (link)]. Briefly, 0.2 g of the frozen material (pulp with skin, without seeds) was extracted in glass centrifuges with 2 mL of acetone at a temperature of 4 °C using an Ultra-Turrax (IKA-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen, Germany) homogenizer for 30 s and determined on the Accela HPLC system (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) using the gradient method. Samples were then filtered into labelled vials through a Cromafil A-20/25 polyamide/nylon filter (Macherey-Nagel, Dueren, Germany). The vials containing the extracts were stored at −20 °C until further analysis. The extracts were then analyzed using HPLC-DAD (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA) at 450 nm with a Gemini C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm 3 μm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The first mobile phase was solvent A: acetonitrile/methanol/water (100/10/5, v/v/v) and the second solvent B: acetone/ethyl acetate (2/1, v/v). The flow rate was 1 mL/min with the following gradient: from 10 to 70% B in the first 18 min, then linearly at 70% B up to 22 min and back to the initial conditions until the end of the run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Pomegranate Flower Anthocyanins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatographic methods, using HPLC-DAD (Dionex Thermoline Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with gradient elution, were developed to determine anthocyanin 3,5-O-glucosides of pelargonidin. The HPLC gradient method, coupled with the DAD detector, allowed the qualitative and quantitative determination of pelargonidin-3,5-glucoside in extracts from pomegranate flowers. The determinations were carried out using a LiChrospher RP18-5 4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 µm; the mobile phase contained 5% formic acid in water(A) and 5% formic acid in methanol (B). The gradient developed for the needs of the method assumed changes in the mobile phase according to the scheme: 0–15 min B = 15–55%, 15–20 min B = 55–65%, 20–30 min B = 65–70%, 30–40 min B = 70–75%. The method considers 10 min re-equilibration time to determine the phase equilibrium column relative to the initial injection phase. The phase flow was set to level 1 mL/min, injection for all test samples was 30 μL, and the detection was carried out at 520 nm. The chromatogram of the extract is shown in Figure 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of T-2 Toxin by HPLC-DAD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the incubation period, cultures were filtrated with Nalgene™ Rapid-Flow™ Filters of 0.45 μm pore size (Thermofischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to remove microorganisms. Filtrates were then extracted with 70 mL of ethyl acetate and shaken on a Universal Shaker SM 30 B Control Edmund Bühler® (Thermofischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) set at 150 rpm overnight. The organic phase was recovered and evaporated until dry under a rotavapor set at 60 °C. Samples were resuspended with 2 mL of acetonitrile/water (30/70, v/v) mixture and filtered through 0.45 µm PTFE syringe filters (Sigma Aldrich, St. Quentin Fallavier, France). Samples were conserved at 4 °C until further analysis. T-2 toxin was analyzed by Gemini C18 columns, 150 mm × 4.6 mm, 3 μm and a pre-column with the same characteristics (Phenomenex). As for PLA, T-2 toxin was detected and quantified using HPLC-DAD (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) according to the methodology described by Medina et al. [59 (link)]. T-2 toxin quantification was calculated according to a standard calibration curve with concentrations ranging between 0.2 and 50 μg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!