The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eclipse plus

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Eclipse Plus is a high-performance analytical instrument designed for laboratory use. It features advanced optical and electronic components to provide accurate and reliable measurements. The core function of the Eclipse Plus is to perform spectroscopic analysis of samples, enabling researchers and analysts to identify and quantify various compounds or elements within a given sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

30 protocols using eclipse plus

1

Quantitative HPLC Analysis of Guaiphenesin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Separation was performed on a stationary phase of a 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm ZORBAX Eclipse Plus® C18 column using a mobile phase consisting of 0.5 mM KH2PO4 solution : methanol (65 : 35, v/v), maintaining a constant flow rate at 1.7 mL min−1. The UV detector was set at 235 nm. The column temperature was adjusted to 25 °C, and guaiphenesin was the selected internal standard. The injection volume was 30 μL and the run time was 7.5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC-MS Analysis of Amino Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BII-Rafflesfungin (0.4 mg) was dissolved in 0.5 mL of 6 N HCl and heated at 100 °C for 8 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and evaporated to dryness. The dried acid hydrolysate was added in 100 μL of H2O, 100 μL of 1% Nα-(2,4-Dinitro-5-fluorophenyl)-L-alaninamide (FDAA) in acetone, and 40 μL of 1 M sodium bicarbonate. The mixture was heated at 40 °C, with stirring for 1 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled to room temperature, neutralized with 20 μL of 2 M HCl, and dried in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in H2O (200 μL) and centrifuged to remove insoluble material before LCMS analysis [Zorbax Eclipse Plus 2.1 × 50 mm 1.8 μm, elution with 20 min linear gradient of 10–45% of solvent B (ACN 0.1% FA)]. The retention time (tR, min) for the standard amino acids DAA-amino acid derivatives were as follows: L-alanine (8.661), D-alanine (10.377), L-serine (6.379), D-serine (6.660), glycine (7.922), L-glutamic acid (7.831), D-glutamic acid (8.807), L-aspartic acid (7.100), D-aspartic acid (7.900), L-threonine (6.775), D-threonine (8.816), L-allo-threonine (6.941), D-allo-threonine (7.845) (Additional file 8: Figure S10).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC-based Pigment Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pigment extraction was performed according to [7 (link)]. The β -carotene, chlorophyll a and b fractions of the cells were determined using HPLC (Agilent 1100, Agilent Technology, USA) equipped with a Reversed-Phase C18 column (Zorbax Eclipse Plus, 1.8  μ m pore size) and 2  μ L injection volume. The pigment extract was eluted with a linear gradient from 100 % eluent A [84 % acetonitrile, 2 % methanol, 14 % Tris buffer (0.1 M, pH 8.0)] to 10 % A and 90 % eluent B (68 % methanol, 32 % ethyl acetate) for 2 min followed by elution with 100 % B for 3 min at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min -1 and detected with a diode array detector (DAD) [8 (link)]. The pigments were identified and quantified by comparing retention time and spectral absorption characteristics with commercial pigment standards (Sigma Aldrich, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying ABA and Proline in Leaf Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ABA and proline extraction was performed on 10mg of freeze-dried leaf tissue as described by Forcat et al. (2008 (link)). The samples were analyzed for ABA and proline using LCMS/MS, and were filtered through a 0.45μm cellulose acetate syringe. The phytohormones separation was done using a C18 column (ZORBAX Eclipse Plus). An injection of 2 μl was loaded onto the C18 column (1.8μm particle size, 2.1mm inner diameter, and 50mm long) at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min and the column temperature was kept at 35°C. The liquid chromatography was connected to an Agilent Technologies Mass Spectrometry (6420 Triple Quad detector). For elution, solvent A consists of formic acid (0.1%) with distilled water and solvent B consists of an LCMS grade acetonitrile were used. The analytical procedure was as follows.
Solvent A was used (5min), then the gradient from 0 to 100% solvent B was used (5–20min), after the solvent B was kept constant (5min) and at 25.1min solvent A was 100% was used for 30min. During the analysis with LC–MSMS only negative polarity mode was used for ABA and Proline analysis. For fragmentation, nitrogen gas was used. The capillary voltage was 4,000V, the gas flow was 8 L/min, the gas temperature was 300°C and the nebulizer pressure was 45 psi.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Polyene Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After removal of solvent using the GeneVac Series II and addition of 25% methanol to enhance solubility the polyene samples (candicidin, filipin) were analysed by electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) using an LTQ-FT (Thermo) mass spectrometer with a 7 T magnet at the Pinnacle Laboratory (University of Newcastle). Experiments were run with a parent/precursor scan at 100,000 resolution. MS/MS fragmentations were carried out in the ion-trap (LTQ) stage of the instrument. Streptothricin and candicidin were analyzed on an LC-MS (Bruker micrOTOF, Agilent 1260 HPLC system, Zorbax Eclipse Plus column (3.5 μm 100 × 4.6 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Carotenoid Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method from Thumkasem et al.4 (link) was used for carotenoid extraction. The fermented broth (1.5 mL) was centrifuged at 7378×g for 5 min, and the resulting cell pellet was washed with distilled water and dried in a freeze-dryer (Gold-sim, Miami, USA). Carotenoids were then extracted using 850 µL of Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 600 µL of acetone. The clear crude extract solution was recovered after centrifuging at 7378×g for 5 min, and β-carotene was quantified using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) (1260 Infinity II, Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, USA) using a modified method of Khumrangsee et al.28 . The HPLC analysis was performed using a C18 reverse-phase column (ZORBAX Eclipse Plus, 150 mm × 4.6 mm × 5 µm) and a diode array detector at a wavelength of 450 nm. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile, dichloromethane, and methanol (7:2:1, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/minute. The carotenoid concentration was evaluated using a calibration curve of a β-carotene standard curve (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed on a fully automatic HPLC system (Agilent Technology, 1260 Infinity, USA), equipped with an online degasser, a quaternary pump, an auto-sampler, a column compartment with oven and a diode array detector (DAD) system. The analysis was performed isocratically on a C18 analytical column (ZORBAX Eclipse plus, 250 × 4.4 mm, 5 μm). The Open LAB CDS Chemstation chromatographic software was used for HPLC data processing (version-C.01.04).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative HPLC Analysis of Phenols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitation of extracted phenols was made by a reverse-phase HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, United States) equipped with a UV detector. Briefly, 20 μl injection volume was separated by a C18 column (ZORBAX Eclipse Plus, 95 Å, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, 959990-902) using isocratic elution program. CUR was detected at 425 nm and eluted with a mobile phase containing acetonitrile–water–acetic acid (50:49:1 v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and 20°C. CAP was UV detected at a wavelength of 281 nm and eluted using with a mobile phase containing methanol and water (80:20 v/v) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and 20°C. Calibration curves was compiled based on seven samples of standard solutions at varying concentrations (R2 = 0.9987), so as to enable quantification of CUR or CAP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Type A Trichothecenes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Type A Trichothecenes were detected using the method previously described by Pascale et al. [27 (link)]. T-2 and HT-2 toxins analysis was performed using a UHPLC (Agilent UHPLC system, 1290 Series). Both data acquisition and instrument control were performed by LC Openlab software (Agilent). For chromatographic separation, a reversed-phase column of C18 (50 × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.8 μm, ZORBAX Eclipse Plus) was used. Analyses were performed in the gradient mode. Solvent A was water and solvent B acetonitrile. Gradient conditions were initiated by holding for the first 1.5 min with 30% B, and then solvent B was linearly increased to 35% in 0.5 min and kept constant for 2 min. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min, and the injection volume was 10 μL. The column temperature was maintained at 50 °C, and the detector was set at 202 nm wavelength. Retention times were 1.97 min and 4.9 min for HT-2 and T-2, respectively. The mycotoxins were quantified by comparing peak areas with calibration curves obtained with standard solutions. The detection limit (LOD) based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1 for both toxins was 0.24 μg/g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synthesis of Novel Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 1

Compounds described herein can be synthesized according to the synthetic methods depicted in Schemes 1-4:

[Figure (not displayed)]

[Figure (not displayed)]

[Figure (not displayed)]

[Figure (not displayed)]

All of the solvents and reagents used were obtained commercially and used as such unless noted otherwise. Moisture- or air-sensitive reactions were conducted under nitrogen atmosphere in oven-dried (120° C.) glass apparatus. Solvents were removed under reduced pressure using standard rotary evaporators. Flash column chromatography was carried out using RediSep Rf ‘Gold’ high performance silica columns on CombiFlash Rf instruments unless otherwise mentioned; thin-layer chromatography was cardried out on silica gel CCM pre-coated aluminum sheets. Purity for all final compounds was confirmed to be greater than 98% by LC-MS using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus 4.6 mm×150 mm, 5 □m analytical reverse phase C18 column with H2O—CH3CN and H2O—MeOH gradients and an Agilent 6520 ESI-QTOF Accurate Mass spectrometer (mass accuracy of 5 ppm) operating in the positive ion acquisition mode.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!