The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

58 protocols using labram hr evolution raman spectrometer

1

Comprehensive Characterization of WO3-x Aggregates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phases and composition of the as-synthesized WO3-x aggregates are determined according to the data recorded in a TTRAX3 X-ray diffractometer (XRD) using a Cu Kα radiation with a wavelength of 0.154 nm and a Horiba Scientific LabRAM HR evolution Raman spectrometer under irradiation of the 532 nm line of a semiconductor laser, respectively. The binding states of elements were analyzed depending on the data obtained from an ESCALAB 250 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) equipped with an Al Kα X-ray source. The studies on the surface morphology and microstructures were carried out in an S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (operated at 5 kV) and a TECNAI G2 F30 high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM) (operated at 300 kV), respectively.
At room temperature, the PL emission from the as-synthesized aggregates was measured in the Horiba Scientific LabRAM HR evolution Raman spectrometer under irradiation of the He-Cd laser with a wave length of 325 nm and ~1 μm diameter of laser beam. During the PL measurement, the power of laser and the acquisition time were set to 6.8 mW and 30 s, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Raman Spectroscopy of VO2 Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution Raman spectrometer with a laser excitation wavelength (λ = 785 nm) in the near-infrared range was used because it has been shown to produce the clearest spectrum of Raman active modes for VO2 on sapphire compared to shorter wavelengths in the visible range35 . This clearer spectrum is achieved because resonance fluorescence at these shorter visible wavelengths increases the background and overwhelms the signal from the VO2 thin film. The spectra were acquired for the Al:ZnO/VO2 thin-film device at various steady-state temperatures by applying a voltage across the electrical contacts on the Al:ZnO film and using an external resistive heater below the sapphire substrate to increase the temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Raman Spectroscopy of Hydrogel-Hydroxyapatite Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acellular hydrogels containing 0 or 1% (w/w) hydroxyapatite nanoparticles were lyophilized and Raman spectra were collected using a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution Raman spectrometer. The spectrometer was calibrated using the 520 cm-1 Raman peak of Si. A spatial resolution of ~2μm and 29 mW power at the sample surface were achieved by 532nm laser beam focused through a 50x L WD (0.75 NA) objective lens. Spectral resolution of 4.5 cm-1 full width at half maximum was achieved by a 600 lines/mm grating with 100 μm confocal pinhole. Spectra are displayed as an average of 15 accumulated spectra collected with a 2 second counting time. Instrumental artifacts were corrected for and a polynomial baseline was subtracted using LabSpec 6 (Horiba Scientific). The spectroscopy work was performed at the Raman Microspectroscopy Lab at the University of Colorado Boulder.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-pressure Raman Spectroscopy of Pyridine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-pressure Raman spectra were collected on the same samples as used for the single-crystal data collections of pyridine-h5 phases II and III using a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution Raman Spectrometer equipped with a CCD detector. Raman spectra were measured using a 633 nm excitation laser, with 1200 lines mm−1 grating and a spectrometer focal length of 800 mm. Spectra were collected between 50 and 3400 cm−1, with a resolution of 1 cm−1. Raman spectra were collected from a ca 2 µm spot size on static pressure samples at 293 K. Spectra plotted over the complete range collected are shown in Figs. S1–S4 of the supporting information. Spectra extracted from the literature were analysed using getData Graph Digitizer (v2.26).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of MoSx Electrocatalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UV-visible absorption spectra of the colloidal solution of NPs were measured in the spectral region of 200–800 nm using a Cary 300 (Agilent Technologies) double-beam spectrophotometer. The liquid samples were used for UV-visible measurements that were collected from the ablation vessel during dielectrophoretic deposition. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of the MoSx samples were done using a Bruker-D8-Focus X-ray diffractometer with CuKα(λ=1.5406Å) line. The Raman spectra of different MoSx samples were measured using a Labram HR Evolution Raman spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon). The X-ray photoelectron spectra of MoSx samples were recorded using Thermo Escalab 250XI X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with AlKα X-ray source. For XRD, Raman and XPS measurements the electrophoretic deposition was done on ITO coated glass substrate during laser ablation. The HITACHI S4800 scanning electron microscope was used to take the SEM measurements of the MoSx/NiF electrocatalysts under the acceleration voltage of 15 kV. All the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectra were also collected by mapping the electron beam at the same acceleration voltage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of Electrocatalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrode morphologies were characterized using a field‐emission scanning electron microscopy (Zeiss Gemini 300, Germany). X‐ray diffraction method (Bruker D8 Advance, Germany) was used to investigate the phase composition of the electrocatalysts at a scan speed of 2° min−1 from 20° to 80°. HRTEM and SAED were performed on JEOL JEM‐F200 at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Corresponding element mapping and energy spectrum were acquired by JED‐2300T. Mo grid was selected for avoiding the possible Cu contamination from normal Cu grid. FT‐IR spectroscopy was equipped with a diffuse‐reflectance cell and collected by Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50 at room temperature. Surface composition and chemical states of the prepared electrodes were measured by XPS, which were acquired by a Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer equipped with a 150 W monochromatic Al‐K radiation. Contact angles of drops on electrodes were measured by the sessile drop method (RAMÉ‐HART 290‐U1, USA). Raman spectra were obtained using Horiba LabRam HR Evolution Raman spectrometer. The wavelength and power of the laser were set at 532 nm and 2.5 mW, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Raman Spectroscopy Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectroscopy measurements
were performed using a LabRAM HR Evolution Raman spectrometer (Horiba
Scientific) and excited with laser (Torus MPC 3000) with a wavelength
of 532 nm (excitation energy EL = hωL = 2.33 e) through an optical fiber,
with an objective lens of 100×, NA = 0.8, and a laser spot of
0.4 μ. The laser power was kept below 2 mW and the diffraction
grating was 600 mm/groove. The range of the Raman spectra collected
spanned the wavenumber region 1200–3000 cm–1. The Raman peak position was calibrated based on the first order
Raman signal of silicon, at 520.7 cm–1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Raman Spectroscopy Protocol for Material Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All Raman spectra were recorded using a Raman spectrometer (LabRAM HR Evolution Raman Spectrometer, HORIBA Scientific Ltd.) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. An Ar+ laser with a wavelength of 532 nm and power of 50 mW was used for Raman excitation. Spectra were acquired using a 10 × objective within 3 s. Three spectra per location were recorded in the wavenumber interval of 400–4000 cm−1. To exclude experimental interference and artifactual errors, three Raman spectra of each sample were recorded at different positions in the same plane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Thermal and Spectroscopic Analysis of Functionalized Graphene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on Q500 equipment (TA Instruments®, New Castle, DE, USA). EG, f-EG, and [(f-EG)+Ag] were placed in a platinum crucible and heated from 40–800 °C at 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere of 50 mL min‒1.
Raman spectra were acquired using a LabRAM HR Evolution Raman spectrometer with a microscope (Horiba Scientific, Piscataway, NJ, USA) using a laser with a wavelength of 532 nm and a grating of 600 gr mm‒1. The results were analyzed with the Horiba Scientific’s Labspec 6 (version 6.4.4) Spectroscopy Suite Software (Horiba France SAS, Longjumeau, France) and the peak positions were determined by applying a baseline (in LabSpec 6).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were carried out using a FEI Nova 200 FEG-SEM/EDS (FEI Europe Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The samples were previously sputtered with a gold layer, using a sputter coater 108A (Cressington, Watford, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Raman Spectroscopy of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectroscopy was carried out on a LabRAM HR Evolution Raman spectrometer (Horiba Scientific, France) coupled with a Horiba Scientific's Labspec 6 spectroscopy set which provides not only complete instrument control but also data processing. The Raman spectra were acquired with a 532 nm laser excitation wavelength (0.1% laser intensity), with an acquisition time and accumulation of 30 s in the range of 40–3500 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!