The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Uplc beh c18 column

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Ireland

The UPLC BEH C18 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of compounds. The column features a silica-based stationary phase with C18 alkyl chains, providing reversed-phase interaction for the effective separation of both polar and non-polar analytes. The column is compatible with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) systems and can operate at high pressures, enabling faster analysis times and increased resolution compared to traditional HPLC columns.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

155 protocols using uplc beh c18 column

1

Mitochondrial Lipid Profiling by UPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitochondria were isolated from cells using a hybrid Percoll-metrizamide gradient method described by Storrie et al.37 (link). We substituted Nycodenz for metrizamide because the latter was difficult to obtain as described in ref. 20 (link). Phospholipids were extracted from purified mitochondria (50 µg of protein) according to the Bligh and Dyer method38 (link) in the presence of 2 µg of internal standards (1,2-dipentadecanoyl PC; Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL). Lipids were analyzed by reverse-phase ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography using an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm) (Waters, Milford, MA) coupled to a 5500 QTRAP mass spectrometer (Sciex Inc., Framingham, MA) as described in ref. 20 (link). PC was quantified using MultiQuant, version 2.0 (Sciex), and normalized against the internal standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UHPLC-MS Analysis of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples of ÜS were analyzed by an Agilent 1290 ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system with a Waters UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm 2.1 ∗ 100 mm). The column temperature was set at 55°C, and the sample injection volume was set at 5 μL. The flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/min. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B). The multistep linear elution gradient program was as follows: 0–11 min, 85–25% A; 11–12 min, 25–2% A; 12–14 min, 2–2% A; 14–14.1 min, 2–85% A; 14.1–15 min, 85–85% A; 15–16 min, 85–85% A. A Q Exactive Focus mass spectrometer coupled with Xcalibur software was employed to obtain the MS and MS/MS data based on the IDA acquisition mode. During each acquisition cycle, the mass range was from 100 to 1500, the top three of every cycle were screened, and the corresponding MS/MS data were further acquired. Sheath gas flow rate was 45 arb, aux gas flow rate 15 arb, capillary temperature 400°C, full MS resolution 70000, MS/MS resolution 17500, collision energy 15/30/45 in NCE mode, and spray voltage 4.0 kV (positive) or −3.6 kV (negative).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Liver Metabolite Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver tissue was homogenized in an extraction solvent. The homogenate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was subjected to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS) analysis using a UPLC-Q-TOF MS instrument (Vion, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column. The LC conditions were as follows: solvent A, 0.1% formic acid (FA) in water; solvent B, 0.1% FA in acetonitrile (ACN); flow rate, 0.35 mL/min; injection volume, 1 µL. The MS conditions were as follows: mode, multiple reaction monitoring; capillary voltage, 3 kV; sample cone voltage, 40 V; desolvation gas flow rate, 800 L/h; cone gas flow rate, 30 L/h; desolvation temperature, 400 ℃; ion source temperature, 100 ℃; lock mass, leucine-enkephalin (556.2771 Da). Data were processed using UNIFI version 1.8.2.169 (Waters). Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and permutation test were performed, and variable importance for projection and P values were determined using SIMCA-P+ version 12.0.1, Umetrics, Sweden.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Organosulfur Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of organosulfur compounds was carried out using a UPLC equipped with a binary pump, column and sample manager, photodiode array detector (PDA), and tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer (TQD) with electrospray ionization (ESI) source working in negative mode (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), as described elsewhere [92 (link)]. Separation was performed using the UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 µm, 100 mm × 2.1 mm, Waters) at 50 °C, at a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. The injection volume of the samples was 5 µL. The mobile phase consisted of water (solvent A) and 40% acetonitrile in water, v/v (solvent B). The following parameters were used: capillary voltage of 3500 V; con voltage of 30 V; con gas flow of 100 L/h; source temperature of 120 °C; desolvation temperature of 350 °C; and desolvation gas flow rate of 800 L/h. Polyphenolic identification and quantitative analyses were performed on the basis of the mass-to-charge ratio, retention time, specific PDA spectra, fragment ions, and comparison of data obtained with commercial standards and literature findings. The analyses were performed in two replications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

UPLC-ESI-MS/MS Quantification of Harmaline and Harmine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Harmaline and harmine concentrations were simultaneous quantitative determined on a Waters-ACQUITY™ UPLC system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm particle size). Mass spectrometric detection was performed using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) equipped with electrospray ionization in positive ionization mode, and all other instrumental parameters were set according to our previous study (Li et al., 2016 (link)). The UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method was well-validated (data not shown) and the analytical method was successfully applied to determine the concentration of harmine and harmaline in the HBSS buffers. Figure S2 presents the representative of typical MRM chromatograms of blank HBSS, blank HBSS spiked with harmine, harmaline and IS, and IS-spiked HBSS sample collected at 30 min after administration of harmine and harmaline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Triterpene Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample extraction was performed as described by Farneti et al. [32 (link)]. Ursolic, oleanolic, and betulinic acids were identified and quantified using the ACQUITY Ultra Performance LC system with a binary solvent manager (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA), a UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 150 mm, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA), and a Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, UK) equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source, operating in the negative mode. The elution solvent was methanol-acetonitrile (15:85, v/v), at a flow rate of 0.1 mL min−1. The m/z for betulinic acid was 455.3452, for oleanolic acid 455.3496, and for ursolic acid 455.3365, and the retention times were 6.80, 7.50, and 8.85 min, respectively. The compounds were monitored at 210 nm. All data were obtained in triplicate. The results were expressed as mg/100 g DW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimization of LC-MS/MS Metabolomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on an Agilent ultra-high performance liquid chromatography 1290 UPLC system with a Waters UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm 2.1100 mm). The flow rate was set at 0.4 mL/min, and the sample injection volume was set at 5 μL. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% in acetonitrile (B). The multistep linear elution gradient program was as follows: 0–3.5 min, 95–85% A. 3.5-min, 85–70%A. 6–6.5, 70–70% A. 6.5–12 min, 70–30% A. 12–12.5 min, 30–30% A. 12.5–18 min, 30–0% A. 18–25 min, 0–0% A. 25–26 min, 0–95% A. 26–30 min, 95–95% A.
A Q Exactive focus mass spectrometer coupled with an Xcalibur software was employed to obtain the MS and MS/MS data based on the IDA acquisition mode. During each acquisition cycle, the mass range was from 100 to 1500, the top three of every cycle were screened, and the corresponding MS/MS data were further acquired. Sheath gas flow rate: 45 Arb, Aux gas flow rate: 15 Arb, capillary temperature: 400°C, full ms resolution: 70000, MS/MS resolution: 17500, collision energy: 15/30/45 in NCE mode, spray voltage: 4.0 kV (positive) or −3.6 kV (negative).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolomic Analysis Using UHPLC-Q Exactive MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolomics was applied using 1,290 ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent, CA, USA) coupled with Q Exactive focus MS/MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Chromatographic separations were performed using a Waters ACQUITY system equipped with an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid water (A) and 0.1% formic acid acetonitrile (B) at the flow rate of 0.5 ml/min, and the injection volume was 4 ml. The gradient program was as follows: 85–25% B (0–11.0 min), 25–2% B (11.0–12.0 min), 2–2% B (12.0–14.0 min), 2–85% B (14.0–14.1 min), 85–85% B (14.1–15.0 min), and 85–85% B (15.0–16.0 min). The ESI source was applied to analyze the chemical composition in both positive and negative ion modes with full scan/ddMS2. The MS parameters were set as follows: the scan range was 50–1,000 m/z, the spray voltages were set at 4.0 and 3.6 kV in positive and negative modes, respectively, sheath gas was 35 arb, auxiliary gas was 10 arb, the capillary temperature was 400°C, the maximum injection time for MS1 and ddMS2 was 100 and 45 ms, respectively, and the resolutions for MS1 and ddMS2 were 70,000 and 17,500, respectively; putative molecules of interest were fragmented using three different collision energies (10, 20, and 40 eV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

UHPLC-QE-MS Analysis of YS Bioactives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used UHPLC-QE-MS to detect and analyze the potential active components of YS to exert its medicinal effect and further clarify the components of YS. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on a UHPLC system (Vanquish, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a Waters UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm 2.1 *100 mm). The flow rate was set at 0.4 mL/min, and the sample injection volume was set at 5 μL. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B). The multi-step linear elution gradient program was as follows: 0–3.5 min, 95–85% A; 3.5–6 min, 85–70% A; 6–6.5 min, 70–70% A; 6.5–12 min, 70–30% A; 12–12.5 min, 30–30% A; 12.5–18 min, 30–0% A; 18–25 min, 0–0% A; 25–26 min, 0–95% A; 26–30 min, 95–95% A.
An Orbitrap Exploris 120 mass spectrometer coupled with an Xcalibur software was employed to obtain the MS and MS/MS data based on the IDA acquisition mode. During each acquisition cycle, the mass range was from 100 to 1,500, and the top four of every cycle were screened. The corresponding MS/MS data were further acquired. Sheath gas flow rate: 30 Arb, Aux gas flow rate: 10 Arb, Ion Transfer Tube Temp: 350°C, Vaporizer Temp: 350°C, Full ms resolution: 60,000, MS/MS resolution: 15,000, Collision energy: 16/38/42 in NCE mode, Spray Voltage: 5.5 kV (positive) or−4 kV (negative).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Leaf Endogenous Hormones Using UPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of leaf endogenous hormones was determined using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). Chromatographic conditions: separation was performed on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 50 mm) equipped with a VanGuard pre-column (BEHC18, 1.7 μm, 2.1 × 5 mm; Waters) and the column temperature was kept at 25 °C. The volume of injection was 5 μl. A solvent system of 0.01% formic acid-water (A) and 0.01% formic acid-methanol (B) was used to elute at a flow rate of 0.1 ml min-1. Mass spectrometry was evaluated using electrospray ionization, positive ion scanning and the multiple reaction monitoring scanning method. Ion source spray voltage was set to 5500 V and the atomizing temperature of the ion source to 500 °C, while the atomizing gas was set to a pressure of 25 p.s.i.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!