The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using arg 1

1

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal amounts of soluble protein extracted from cells were separated by SDS–PAGE and then transferred to a PVDF membrane (HybondTM‐P, Amershan, Piscataway, NJ). The blots were probed with specific antibodies to iNOS (BD transduction Lab., San Jose, CA), EDN1, HYAL‐1, ARG‐1 (GeneTex, Inc, Irvine, CA), Caspase‐1 (Millipore, Billerica, MA), IL‐1β (Abnova, Taipei City, Taiwan), TNFα (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN), p‐A‐CoA, p‐AMPKα, and (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA), and β‐actin (Sigma‐Aldrich). The signal of electrochemical luminescence in probed blots was detected using FUJI Medical X‐ray film (FUJI Corporation, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan). The densitometry of specific bands on the blot was measured by Image J software (NCBI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunocytochemical Profiling of M1 and M2 Microglial Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
M1 and M2 marker expression in microglia was examined using immunocytochemistry (ICC) according to previously published methods [15 (link)]. Fixed cells were probed with primary antibodies for the M1 phenotype, iNOS (1:200; BD Transduction Laboratories; Franklin Lakes, NJ), and COX-2 (1:200; Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) or the M2 phenotype, Arg-1 (1:200; GeneTex, Irvine, CA), RELMα/Fizz1 (1:100; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ), or transglutaminase-2 (1:100; Thermo Fischer Scientific). In addition, the microglial cell markers anti-iba1 (1:5,000; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and CD68/ED1 (Macrosialin; 1:200; AbD Serotec) were used. For visualization, the secondary antibodies, goat anti-mouse Alexa-594 or anti-rabbit Alexa-594 (1:200, Life Technologies Corp.) were used along with the nuclear marker Hoechst 33342 (1:1,000; Life Technologies Corp.). The morphology of the cells was demarcated by staining with Phalloidin-488 (1:100; Life Technologies Corp). Images were acquired by sequential scanning of the immunostained cells with an Olympus Fluorescence confocal microscope (Olympus, Fluoview FV 1000). For each treatment condition, three to four randomly selected fields were imaged per well. Images obtained were representative of three independently conducted experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting for M1 and M2a Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed on culture supernatants, total cell lysates, or spinal cord (T7–9) tissue homogenates to quantify the expression of M1 and M2a markers according to previously published methods [15 (link)]. Nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories) were probed with specific primary antibodies; Arg-1 (1:2,000; GeneTex Inc., Irvine, CA), iNOS (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA), TNF-α (1:500; Life Technologies Corp.), and β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich). The optical density of the bands (arbitrary units) was measured with an imaging densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and normalized to β-actin levels. The data represents values from three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!