The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using noxafil

1

Preparation of Injectable and Oral Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
F901318 for i.v. injection was prepared in the following way. The desired amount of drug was weighed, added to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and vortexed until fully dissolved. Subsequently, polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400) was added and the mixture vortexed. A solution of 35.3% hydroxyl propyl β cyclodextrin (HPBCD) was prepared in water. The solution of F901318 in DMSO-PEG and the HPBCD solution were mixed to give a clear solution. The final excipient concentrations were 30% HPCD, 5% DMSO, and 10% PEG 400. Appropriate volumes of F901318 were prepared and stored at −20°C for daily use. Prior to use, drug-containing vials were fully thawed and vortexed. An oral suspension of posaconazole (Noxafil; Merck, Inc., USA) was used and diluted with 20% HPBCD (4 g HPBCD in 20 ml water) as previously described (8 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Compound Dissolution and Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Posaconazole (Selleck Chemicals; S1257), voriconazole (Selleck Chemicals; S1442), vismodegib (GDC-0449; LC Laboratories), sonidegib (NVP-LDE225; LC Laboratories), and KAAD-cyclopamine (Calbiochem; 239804), SAG (Cayman Chemical; 11914) were dissolved in DMSO. Arsenic trioxide (Sigma) was formulated as previously described (16 (link)). 20(S)-hydroxycholesterol (Steraloids Inc; C6480-000), lathosterol (Sigma), desmosterol (Sigma), and cholesterol (Sigma) were prepared in ethanol.
For in vivo experiments, Posaconazole oral suspension (Noxafil, Merck) was obtained from the pharmacies of University of Texas Southwestern, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center or The Children’s Hospital and Research Center at Oakland and diluted as necessary with sterile water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antifungal Prophylaxis for AML/MDS Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients admitted to DUH for first induction or reinduction chemotherapy for AML or MDS received antifungal prophylaxis at the discretion of the oncology team, as there was no institutional protocol dictating prophylaxis during the study years. The attending physicians rotated inpatient clinical responsibilities weekly. Posaconazole suspension (Noxafil, Merck &Co, Inc. Whitehouse Station, NJ) was administered orally as 200 mg three times daily. Fluconazole was typically administered orally as 400 mg once daily (with adjustments based on renal function as necessary). Serum concentration monitoring was not routinely performed for patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis in our institution during the study period. Antibacterial prophylaxis was not routinely administered to AML/MDS patients in our institution during the study time frame, although antiviral prophylaxis with acyclovir was administered for those with a history of herpes simplex virus infection. No substantial changes in chemotherapy protocols were made during the study years.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Immunocompromised Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were obtained from a prospective study by Vanstraelen et al. 12 In this study, 14 immunocompromised children aged 13 years or younger with a hematological malignancy were treated prophylactically with the posaconazole oral suspension (Noxafil, Merck, Brussels, Belgium) at a dose of 120 mg/m 2 three times daily, taken with a meal. 12 Eight blood samples were collected from each patient during one dosing interval at steady-state (after at least eight days of treatment). The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee (NCT02372357). Written informed consent was obtained from each child's relative. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antifungal Compound Efficacy Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Institute of Public Health (WIV, Brussels, Belgium) and Prof. J. Maertens (University Hospital Leuven, Belgium) and included A. flavus (B59000), A. niger (J930117), A. terreus (IHEM 5918) and A. fumigatus (B19119 and AF198-R [azole-resistant]). The isolates were cultivated on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) (Lab M, U.K.) supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) chloramphenicol (Sigma-Aldrich, Diegem, Belgium). Stocks with a concentration of 5x10 6 colony forming units (cfu)/ml were prepared in RPMI-MOPS with 10% glycerol and 0.01% Tween-80 and frozen in liquid nitrogen. For the in vitro experiments, pre-titrated cryopreserved vials were used. Fresh inocula of A. fumigatus B19119 were used for the in vivo studies.
Antifungal compounds MIL, VOR (Sigma-Aldrich) and POS (Merck, Noxafil® oral formulation 40 mg/ml) were used as reference drugs. Dafra Pharma Research and Development (Turnhout, Belgium) supplied liposomal OlPC (18 mg/ml or 41.5 µM) for in vitro and in vivo use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Particle Size Distribution of Triazole Aerosols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
However, the particle size distribution for posaconazole aerosol was not reported earlier. The particle size distribution for both triazoles was determined using a previously optimized system (AeroEclipse II nebulizer with 8650D compressor operated at 40 psig). Voriconazole lyophilized powder (Vfend I.V.; Pfizer Inc., NY) or posaconazole intravenous solution (Noxafil; Merck & Co., INC., NJ) was reconstituted or diluted, respectively, to 10 mg/mL of voriconazole and 6 and 12 mg/mL of posaconazole. Sterile water for injection was used to reconstitute voriconazole, as per manufacturer's instruction, whereas posaconazole dilutions were prepared in 0.9% normal saline. Triplicate trials were performed at room temperature in a next generation impactor (MSP Corporation, MN) operated at 15 L/min to obtain parameters such as mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), geometric standard deviation (GSD), percentage of respirable fraction (RF), and percentage of fine particle fraction (FPF). 18 The online calculator tool at www.mmadcalculator.com 19 was used to calculate MMAD and GSD. RF and FPF were calculated as percentage of aerosol particles <5.4 and 3.3 µm, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!