Hem 7201

Manufactured by Omron

Sourced in Japan

The HEM-7201 is an upper arm blood pressure monitor designed to measure and display systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as well as heart rate. The device is intended for home use and features clinically validated accuracy.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Digital bp machine, by Omron (2 mentions)

13 protocols using hem 7201

Blood Pressure and Anthropometric Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Blood pressure was measured using a validated Omron HEM‐7201 automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor (Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan) at the first and second clinic visits. On each of the two occasions, three blood pressure readings were obtained in the seated position after the patients had rested for at least 5 min. These six readings on two clinic visits were averaged for statistical analysis.
Anthropometric measurements included body weight, body height, and waist and hip circumferences. Body mass index was calculated as the body weight in kilograms divided by the body height in meters squared. Overweight and obesity was defined as a body mass index of 25 kg/m² or greater. Abdominal obesity was defined as a waist circumference ≥90 cm.

Ye X., Miao C., Zhang W., Ji L, & Wang J. (2023). Alcohol intake and dyslipidemia in male patients with hypertension and diabetes enrolled in a China multicenter registry. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 25(2), 183-190.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Ankle-Brachial Index Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Before detection, patients were asked to lie supine for 15 minutes in a 20⁰C room. ABI was detected using a HEM-7201 intelligent electronic sphygmomanometer (produced by Omron Co., Ltd.). Ankle artery pressure detection was carried out 2-3 cm above the ankle joint at the dorsalis pedis artery. The sensor was placed at the pulsation point of the posterior tibial artery. Brachial artery pressure was detected using an inflatable blood pressure cuff, and the end of the rubber tube of the cuff was placed on the pulsation point of the brachial artery. The lower edge of the cuff was placed 2-3 cm from the cubital fossa. Blood pressure was measured in both upper arms, then in both ankles, three times at two-minute intervals. The average value of the three tests was calculated and the ABI (ankle artery pressure/brachial artery pressure) was determined. The lowest value of the ABI on both the left and right sides was determined, with an ABI<0.9 considered abnormal.12 (link)

Chang Q., Zhang F., Xue Q, & Song A. (2024). Evaluation of ankle brachial index, serum miR-103 and LP-PLA2 in the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 40(4), 763-766.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

BP measurement was the primary outcome. An Omron brand digital BP machine (code HEM-7201) was used to measure participants’ BP following the standard processes identified by the Joint National Committee VII affiliated with National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (). BP measurements were obtained twice. The values for systolic and diastolic BPs were averaged.

Li W.W, & Toh P. (2023). WeChat-Based Intervention for Chinese Immigrants With Hypertension: Development and Evaluation Study. Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal, 7, e45769.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Community-based Hypertension Screening and Surveillance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

In Emin, anthropometric and clinical measurements using questionnaires were taken during door-to-door screening. Questions assessed demographic characteristics, education, lifestyle risk factors (cigarette and alcohol use), and hypertension-related information. Physical examination including BP measurement was conducted as well. We measured BP three times using an electronic sphygmomanometer (Omron HEM-7201) from the unclothed right arm of the person in a sitting position at intervals of at least 1 min after a rest of at least 5 min. Mean of the three BP was used in this analysis. Body weight, height, and waist circumference were measured using standard methods. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight divided by squared height (kg/m²).
In addition, we collected data on hospitalization and hospital stay length for hypertension, CVD, and stroke from the medical insurance system and county hospitals both in the intervention and control area between 2014 and 2016. Furthermore, we collected death data (death diagnosis and certificate) from the hospital information and household registration system of both the intervention and control area between 2011 and 2016. However, we did not collect BP- and hypertension-related data from the population in the control area.

Heizhati M., Li N., Zhang D., Abulikemu S., Chang G., Hong J., Maimaiti N., Hu J., Wang L, & Duiyimuhan G. (2021). Government-Expert Joint Intervention with Treatment Algorithm and Improved Hypertension Management and Reduced Stroke Mortality in a Primary-Care Setting. International Journal of Hypertension, 2021, 9661576.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Blood Pressure Response to Temperature

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Blood pressure testers: research nurses;
Participants: The blood pressure was measured in a sitting position to protect and relax. The thickness of the jacket was no more than 0.5 cm. The lower edge of the cuff was 2~3 cm above the elbow socket, and it was considered to be moderately tight if two fingers could fit into it.
Cuff: the cuff for ordinary people to use the electronic blood pressure monitor is 22–32 cm, and the cuff for obese people to use the electronic blood pressure monitor is 32–45 cm.
First, a cuff was carefully placed on the right arm of the participant. In this study, seated BP was measured using an electronic (oscillometric) BP device (Omron HEM-7201) in each room at the 17th and 19th minute. The average of these two measurements was recorded as the final value for each participant. The BP was measured with the same BP device for each participant.
The BP measured in the 25°C room was recorded as the baseline BP (BP-25). The BPs measured in the 28°C and 18°C rooms were recorded as BP-28 and BP-18, respectively. The difference in BP between the 28°C and 18°C rooms was recorded as delta BP, and the difference in temperature was recorded as delta T. The BP change rate was calculated using the following formula: Delta BP ÷ Delta T (mmHg/°C).

Chen X., Tu P., Sun X.L., Hu T.Y., Wan J., Hu Y.W., Zhou H.L, & Su H. (2021). The Impact on Blood Pressure of a Short-Term Change in Indoor Temperature. International Journal of General Medicine, 14, 1507-1511.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Measurement of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Blood pressure was measured at the first and second clinic visits. On each of the two occasions, three blood pressure readings were obtained consecutively with an interval of 30‐60 seconds in the sitting position after the study participants had rested for at least five minutes. A validated Omron HEM‐7201 automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor (Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan) was used in all participating hospitals. The six blood pressure readings on the two clinic visits were averaged for statistical analysis and for the definition of hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medication).
Anthropometric measurements included body weight, body height, and waist and hip circumferences. Body mass index was calculated as the body weight in kilograms divided by the body height in meters squared.
In patients without previously diagnosed diabetes mellitus, an oral glucose tolerance test was performed, and diabetes mellitus was defined in the presence of a fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L or a 2‐h post‐loading plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L. In patients with previously diabetes mellitus, plasma fasting glucose was measured. HbA1c was measured in all patients.

Miao C., Ye X., Zhang W., Ji L, & Wang J. (2021). Association between dyslipidemia and antihypertensive and antidiabetic treatments in a China multicenter study. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 23(7), 1399-1404.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Comprehensive Metabolic and Cardiovascular Assessments

Cited 1 time

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Baseline characteristics such as body weight and body height were measured in all subjects. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the body weight in kilograms divided by the body height in meters squared. BP was measured using a validated Omron HEM-7201 automatic oscillometric BP monitor (Omron Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan) at the first and second clinic visits. At both visits, three BP readings were obtained in the seated position after the patients had rested for at least 5 min. These six readings were averaged for statistical analysis.
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were measured using the glucose oxidase method. HbA1c was measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography (Ultra2 HbA1c Detector, PRIMUS Corporation, USA, normal range: 4–6%). The urinary routine test was performed on fresh urine samples, and the UACR was measured using the immunochemical method as described in the ATTEND study [18 (link)].

Ren Q., Ma C., Wang J., Guo X, & Ji L. (2020). Prevalence of Albuminuria in Cardiology and Endocrinology Departments and Its Influencing Factors: A Multicenter, Real-World Evidence Study in China. International Journal of Hypertension, 2020, 1231593.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Validating WHO STEPS NCD Risk Indicators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

WHO STEPS survey instrument was used to determine the prevalence of WHO recommended core NCD risk indicators.¹² STEP 11 instruments used were digital BP recorder, OMRON model HEM 7201, flat surface spring balance weighing machine, glucometer model Romeo and SECA Stadiometer for measuring blood glucose and height respectively. The validation of each screening tool was done by comparing with standard reference instruments. Mercury sphygmomanometer was used for validating digital BP recorder. The weighing machine was cross checked using standard weights. The glucose value was cross checked using same sample for glucometer based and fully automatic auto analyzer based estimation using standard kits and following standard procedures.

Negi P.C., Chauhan R., Rana V., V.i.d.y.a.s.a.g.a.r, & Lal K. (2016). Epidemiological study of non-communicable diseases (NCD) risk factors in tribal district of Kinnaur, HP: A cross-sectional study. Indian Heart Journal, 68(5), 655-662.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Measuring Patient Blood Pressure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

An Omron brand digital BP machine (code: HEM-7201) was used to measure patient blood pressure following the standard processes by the Joint National Committee VII (Joint National Committee, 2003 ). Blood pressures were obtained twice. The values for systolic and diastolic blood pressures were averaged.

Li W.W., Lew D, & Quach L. (2020). Efficacy of a Culturally and Linguistically Competent Community Health Coach Intervention for Chinese with Hypertension. Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal, 5(3), 111-119.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Comprehensive Health Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

World Health Organization steps (WHO STEPs) approach survey instrument was used to record the data on sociodemographic, health behavior. The psychosocial factors such as depression, anxiety, and stress were measured using the scale-21 (DASS-21).¹³ The anthropometry data were measured using validated tools. Weight was recorded using hard surface spring balance weighing machine calibrated against standard weight, height using Secca stadiometer and waist circumference with 1 cm width non-stretchable measuring tape. The blood pressure (BP) was measured using a digital BP recorder, Omron model HEM 7201. The measurement of blood glucose and lipid profile was done using fully autoanalyzer Arba Panacea using standard kits in fasting state.

Negi P.C., Sondhi S., Merwaha R, & Asotra S. (2019). Prevalence and risk determinants of metabolic syndrome in obese worksite workers in hill city of Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian Heart Journal, 71(1), 45-51.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!