The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Automated cell counter

Manufactured by NanoEnTek
Sourced in United States

The Automated Cell Counter is a versatile laboratory instrument designed for accurate and reliable cell counting. It utilizes advanced optical technology to quickly and precisely determine the number of cells in a sample. The device provides consistent and reproducible results, making it a valuable tool for a wide range of research and clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using automated cell counter

1

Assessing Cell Viability and Radiation Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two methods of cell viability were employed : cell-counting using an automated cell counter (NanoEnTek, Seoul, Korea) after trypan blue staining and the clonogenic assay. During the survival assay, cells were plated on 60-mm culture plates (2×104 cells). After 24 hours, 10 μM dexamethasone was added, and 24 hours later, the cells were subjected to different doses of radiation : 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 Gy. Cells were then incubated at 37°C with regular media changes for 8–10 days until the control was 100% confluent. Cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), trypsinized with 1 mL trypsin-EDTA, stained with trypan blue, and counted using an automated cell counter. The percentage of viable cells was calculated from the ratio of treated cells to normal control cells. Three independent experiments were carried out, and the mean value was determined.
For the colony-forming assay, cells were plated at clonogenic density (1.0×103) in a 60-mm culture plate, then treated with dexamethasone (10 μM) and a radiation dose (10 Gy) as per the experiment setup. Cells were incubated for 8–10 days with regular media changes after treatment. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes, then stained with 0.4% crystal violet for 20 minutes, washed under running distilled water, and allowed to dry for 2 hours. A cluster of 50 cells or more was scored as a colony.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Culturing Liver and Breast Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liver and breast cancer cells were cultured according to standard mammalian tissue protocols with a sterile technique. Briefly, human liver hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2) and human breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF-7) (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in DMEM (PAA Laboratories GmbH, Pasching, Austria) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) or 10 µg/mL insulin, respectively, and a 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution at 37 °C in 5% CO2 and 95% air humidified atmosphere as adherent monolayers in 25 cm2 cell culture flasks. After 48 h, the cells were detached from the flask using Trypsin, separated from the medium via centrifugation and counted using an automated cell counter (NanoEntek, Waltham, MA, USA). Trypan blue was used to count and discriminate between viable and non-viable cancer cells. This dye selectively stains non-viable cells and exhibits distinctive blue under the microscope. Briefly, a suspension of cancer cells (HepG2 or MCF-7) in PBS was diluted in Trypan blue solution (0.4%) at a 1:1 ratio. When cell viability was above 85%, the cells were used for further experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cultivation of HCT116 Colorectal Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCT116 (LGC Standards, Wesel, Germany) human CRC cells were cultured at 37°C, 100% atmospheric humidity and 5% CO2 in RPMI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) –emented with 10% fetal calf serum (Bio&Sell, Feucht, Germany). Cells were harvested using trypsin/EDTA (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and counted in an automated cell counter (NanoEnTek, Seoul, Korea). Cells were regularly verified as mycoplasma-negative (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Authentication of cell lines was performed by short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping (Multiplexion, Heidelberg, Germany). STR genotypes were consistent with published genotypes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Analysis of Inguinal LNs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
24 hours after injection, mice were euthanized and the inguinal LNs were removed and placed in PBS. A single cell suspension was prepared by passing each LN through a 40 μm strainer with PBS and the total cell number was enumerated using an automated cell counter (NanoEnTek, Pleasanton, CA). Cells were then stained in a similar manner to co-culture studies and analyzed by flow cytometry for viability (DAPI), phenotype (DC, CD11c+; B cell, B220+; T cell, CD3+), and DC activation markers (i.e., CD40, CD80, CD86, MHCII).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Mitochondrial Function in PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An additional 10 ml of whole blood was collected on the day of hospital admission to retrieve PBMCs for an evaluation of mitochondrial function. PBMCs (lymphocytes and monocytes) from all patients were purified from EDTA-blood by isopycnic centrifugation using Histopaque-1077. PBMCs were stained with trypan blue dye and counted using an automated cell counter (NanoEntek, Korea). 2 × 105 cells were used to determine mitochondrial function in the PBMCs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Cell Growth in A549 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confluent A549 cells were harvested, and plated at final seed density 10 × 105 cells/mL into 24-well plates (Corning, Sydney Australia) and subjected to group 1 treatment. The cells were then outgrown for up to 168 h at 37°C in a 5% (v/v) CO2 atmosphere. The effect of pyocyanin, GSSG, and GSH on A549 cell growth was determined by measuring cell number using EVETM Automated Cell Counter, NanoEnTek and Cell Counting Slides at the beginning (0 h) and at all other time points (24, 72, 120, and 168 h).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Cell Viability and Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated in complete media in 24-well plates prior to starvation. Twenty-four hours after seeding, cells were washed with PBS and incubated in the indicated glutamine- or serum-starvation media with 10% dialyzed FBS. For rescue experiments, the cells were incubated in the media supplemented with either 0% BSA or 4% BSA. Negative control cells for macropinocytosiswere treated with EIPA. The number of viable cells was assessed using automated cell proliferation detector using IncuCyteTM (Essen Instruments, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Proliferation was measured through quantitative kinetic processing metrics derived from time-lapse image acquisition and presented as percentage of culture confluence over time. The number of cells wasalso counted either using a Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and/or using trypan blue exclusion and an automated cell counter (Nano-Entek, Seoul, Korea). Cell viability was determined by Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining following standard protocols at indicated periods of time (BD Biosciences). Cells negative for both Annexin V and PI staining were considered live cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Viability Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated in complete media on either 96 well or 24 well plates prior to starvation. Twenty-four hours after seeding, cells were washed with PBS and incubated in the indicated glutamine-or EAA starvation media with 10% dialyzed FBS. For rescue experiments, the cells were incubated in the media supplemented with 2% BSA. Negative control cells for macropinocytosis were treated with EIPA. The number of viable cells was assessed using the MTT assay and relative cell number was determined by sulforhodamine B (SRB; Sigma-Aldrich) staining following standard protocols at indicated periods of time to examine the cytotoxic effect of the drug in vitro. The number of cells was counted either using a Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter) and/or using trypan blue exclusion and an automated cell counter (Nano-Entek, Korea). Cell viability was determined by Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining following standard protocols at indicated periods of time (BD Biosciences). Cells negative for both Annexin V and PI staining are considered live cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!