The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Winnonlin v 5

Manufactured by Pharsight
Sourced in United States

WinNonlin v. 5.2 is a software application used for nonlinear regression analysis. It is designed to analyze pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using winnonlin v 5

1

Pharmacokinetics of KW-2478 in Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were collected on days 1 and 5 at the following times: predose, 0.833 h after start of infusion, and 0.167, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h after the end of infusion, and predose for days 2 and 4. Heparinised plasma samples were collected, stored at <–20 °C, and analysed at an independent central laboratory. Following solid-phase extraction, plasma KW-2478 concentrations were determined using a validated reverse-phase, high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry detection with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.200 mg ml–1 The following pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a standard non-compartmental model with WinNonlin v.5 (Pharsight Co., Princeton, NJ, USA): maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), areas under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to last measurable time point (AUC0–t) and to infinity (AUC0–∞), terminal half-life (t½), elimination rate constant (kel), total plasma clearance (CL), and accumulation ratio (R) comparing day 5 vs day 1 for Cmax and AUC0–t.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sorafenib Pharmacokinetics: 24-Hour Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples collected at several time points during the 24 hours after the initial dose of sorafenib were analyzed using a validated HPLC/MS/MS method.16 Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic assessment of sorafenib was performed using WinNonlin v5 (Pharsight Corp, Mountainview, CA) on cycle 1 day 1. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to Cmax (Tmax) were recorded as observed values and the area under the plasma-concentration time curve was calculated using the Linear Trapezoidal rule. Exposure (AUC) was calculated from 0–12 hours to eliminate complications from BID dosing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Albuterol and Ipratropium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The steady‐state PKs of albuterol and ipratropium bromide in plasma and urine following administration from the inhaled devices were characterized using noncompartmental methods with the PK and statistical software program WinNonlin v. 5 (Pharsight, Mountain View, CA). Primary parameters of interest included the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), minimum observed plasma concentration (Cmin), and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC), estimated using a model‐independent trapezoidal method. The amount of unchanged drug excreted into urine at 0–2 h and over the entire 8‐h (Trial 1) or 6‐h (Trial 2) collection period was evaluated for each device.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pharmacokinetics of Compound DV1 in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (n = 5, weight 200–220 g), provided by Charles River Laboratories (Beijing, China), were used in the pharmacokinetics studies. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tsinghua University (Beijing, China). Rats were subcutaneously administered of DV1 (dissolved in physiological saline) at a single dose of 10 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected into heparin-coated polypropylene centrifuge tubes at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after the dose. The plasma sample was obtained from blood collection by centrifugation at 3,500 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and then frozen at −80 °C until analysis. The samples and QCs were analyzed by the LC-MS/MS described above. The pharmacokinetic parameters of DV1 were determined by using WinNonlin v. 5.2 (Pharsight, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cocaine Pharmacokinetics in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Naïve mice were administered a single 20 mg/kg dose of IP COC HCl, anesthetized with isoflurane at 10 and 30 min following COC administration and 50 μl of blood was collected by cardiac puncture, placed in a heparinized tube, centrifuged and the resulting plasma was removed and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Whole brain was collected, rinsed, weighed and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Plasma and brain samples were stored at −80°C until analyzed. Plasma and brain concentrations of COC, norcocaine (NOR) and benzoylecgonine (BZE) were quantified using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (Slawson et al. 2002 (link)).
Plasma and brain concentrations are expressed as ng/ml and ng/g, respectively. The area under the concentration vs. time curve (AUC) in plasma and brain was calculated for each animal using a linear-up log-down function (Winnonlin v5.2; Pharsight, St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pharmacokinetics of KW-2478 in Phase I

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were taken on days 1 and 11 for pharmacokinetic analysis in phase I. Predose samples were taken immediately prior to BTZ administration for the determination of both KW-2478 and BTZ. Samples were taken at the following nominal times after the start of KW-2478 infusion for determination of KW-2478: 1 (end of infusion), 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 4, and 7 h on days 1 and 11, and 25 h on day 1.
Plasma KW-2478 concentrations were determined at a central laboratory (Quintiles AB Bioanalytical Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden) using a validated method that employed solid-phase extraction followed by quantitation using a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry method.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods using WinNonlin v.5.2 (Pharsight Co., Mountain View, CA, USA). The following variables were calculated using this model: Cmax (maximum serum concentration); Tmax (time to Cmax); AUC0–∞ and AUC0–t (area under the serum concentration−time curve extrapolated to infinity and to the last measurable time point, respectively); CL (total plasma clearance); Vz (volume of distribution based on the elimination phase); t1/2 (elimination half-life); and R (accumulation ratio calculated as day 11 AUC0–7 h/day 1 AUC0–7 h).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitation of Melatonin and NAS by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Details of the analytical method used in the study are reported in (Carter et al. 2012 (link)). Briefly, blood was collected over an 8-h period and immediately placed on ice. Plasma was isolated within 45 min of blood collection. Baseline and PK plasma samples were analyzed in the Vanderbilt Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Core Facility by nanoflow LC–MS/MS and HPLC–MS/MS repectively (Carter et al. 2012 (link)). Nanoflow LC was necessary to reliably quantitate the low (pg/ml) endogenous levels of melatonin and N-acetylserotonin (NAS). PK parameters [maximal concentration of melatonin (Cmax), time to maximal concentration (Tmax), AUC, half-life (t1/2), clearance (CI), and volume of distribution (Vz)] were derived from plasma concentration versus time curves using the program Win-Nonlin v. 5.2 (Pharsight, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The data were analyzed using a noncompartment model as described in Carter et al. 2012 (link). The LC–MS/MS analytical method was validated on a small group of adult volunteers (two male, two female, weight 72–109 kg, age 28–64 years, height 1.65–1.83 m). For the adult population, calculated PK parameters were consistent with literature values (Table SI and S2). The AUC and Cmax showed evidence of linear kinetics. The half-life (t1/2) and Tmax were not a function of dose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tramadol and Metabolite Pharmacokinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each subject from tramadol and M1 plasma concentrations vs. time curves using WinNonLin v 5.3 (Pharsight Corp). The comparison between competing models (one-vs. two-compartment) was made using the Akaike test. The best fit was described by a two-compartment open and a non-compartmental model, for tramadol and M1, respectively. The area under the concentration vs. time curve (AUC 0- ) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule (Gibaldi and Perrier, 1982) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All IVF outcome data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Percentage of metaphase II oocytes and percentage of blastocyst-stage embryos were compared using a two-tailed paired Student’s t test. Total cell count, ICM cell count, TE cell count, and percentage of ICM to TE cells in blastocyst-stage embryos were assessed with Student’s t tests. Data were analyzed with Prism software (GraphPad Software). Differences were considered statistically significant at p< 0.05. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of the serum ethanol concentrations was performed using WinNonlin v5.3 software (Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA, USA) to estimate time of peak (Tmax) ethanol concentrations using a one compartmental model and nonlinear regression analysis based on the Gauss-Newton (Levenberg and Hartly) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!