Only fully completed survey responses were included in the final analysis. Data was analysed using SPSS® (v.27.0) software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Univariable comparisons between groups were performed using the student’s t or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables, and Chi2 or Fischer exact test for categorical variable. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was performed for non-parametric continuous data comparing more than two groups (year groups). Logistic regression was conducted to identify factors influencing specialty choice. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Free text responses were analysed using a thematic approach.
Spss v 27.0 software
Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States
SPSS® (v.27.0) software is a statistical analysis tool developed by IBM. It is designed to help users analyze and interpret data. The software provides a range of statistical techniques, including regression analysis, factor analysis, and clustering. SPSS® can be used across various industries and research fields to support data-driven decision-making.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
2 protocols using spss v 27.0 software
1
Factors Influencing Specialty Choice
2
Reliability of Biometric Measurements
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Data were recorded using Microsoft Excel, which was also used for graphic data representation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v27.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Normality of the dependent variables was checked using the Shapiro-Wilk test. If normality was observed, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out. If normality was not observed, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. The variability among the three measures was reported with the coefficient of variation. The reliability of the three measures (
Underlying data) was reported with the intraclass correlation coefficient (2.1) looking for absolute agreement. A significance level of 0.05 was used. Values are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Underlying data) was reported with the intraclass correlation coefficient (2.1) looking for absolute agreement. A significance level of 0.05 was used. Values are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!