The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using cd209

1

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with ice cold PBS. After FcR blockage (Miltenyi, Germany), cells were stained with the respective antibodies in PBS supplemented with 0.5% FCS, 2.5 mM EDTA for 20min at 4°C. Following antibodies were purchased from Biolegend (USA): CD19 (HIB19), CD11b (CBRM1/5), CD23 (EBVCS-5), CD14 (M5E2); R&D: VSIG4 (polyclonal), MARCO (polyclonal), CCR7 (150503); Becton Dickinson (BD, USA): CD56 (B159), HLA-DR (L243), CD209 (DCN46), CD226 (DX11); Data acquisition was performed with a LSR II (BD). Analyses were performed with FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cardiac Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ventricular tissue was fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin using standard histological procedures. The tissue was cut to yield 5‐μm‐thick cross sections. The sections were subsequently stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Masson's trichrome staining to determine the extent of fibrosis.
Immunohistochemical examinations were performed on 5‐μm‐thick formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded tissue sections. All steps were performed on a Leica Bond III automated system (Leica Microsystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, specimens were deparaffinized and antigen was retrieved on the instrument. All slides were incubated with primary antibodies against CD68 (diluted 1:1000; Dako), CD209 (1:1000; BD Pharmingen), or CD11c (1:100; GeneTex) for 16 min, followed by incubation with a mouse‐rabbit‐horseradish peroxidase polymer and 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine substrate. The sections were then incubated in primer (anti‐rabbit and anti‐mouse) for 8 minutes. Antibody binding was visualized using the avidin‐biotin complex method according to the manufacturer's instructions (Vectastain ABC; Vector). The primary antibody was omitted from these protocols as a negative control. The sections were subsequently counterstained with HE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Generation of Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed after the approval of the institutional Committee for Ethics in Research (Fundação Pró-Sangue, CEP#03, FMUSP). Healthy donors’ peripheral blood was obtained from leukoreduction chambers (41 (link)) after signed written informed consents. PBMCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation over Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). For the generation of monocyte-derived DCs, PBMCs were either plated for 2 h for adherence of monocytes to the plastic and subsequent removal of non-adherent cells (42 (link)) or by positive magnetic selection (Milteny Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) for the isolation of CD14+ monocytes. The monocytes were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, antibiotic-antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 50 ng/ml of IL-4 plus 50 ng/ml of GM-CSF (both from PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) for 5 days to obtain immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (iDCs) (43 (link)). At day 5, iDCs cells were harvested, washed, counted, and activated for 24 h with previously transduced SK-MEL-147 cells at a 1:1 and 1:10 ratios. Cells were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry using CD209 (DCN46, #551545, BD), HLA-DR (G46-6, #556643, BD), CD80 (L307.4, #340294, BD), CD83 (HB15e, #561132, BD), CD86 (2331, #561124, BD) or used for the priming of autologous T cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Immunophenotyping of Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were detached and washed once with 1x PBS and resuspended in FACs buffer (0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA in PBS). Staining with extracellular fluorochrome coupled-antibodies was carried out in 100uL of FACs buffer for 20 minutes in the dark at 4 °C. Antibodies used for macrophage phenotyping were: CD80 (BV605 BD Biosciences), CD83 (BV650, BD Biosciences), CD86 (BV786, BD Biosciences), CD200R (PE, Biolegend), CD206 (Alexa-Fluor647, BD Biosciences), CD209 (BV421, BD Biosciences). Viability staining was performed by adding one drop of Sytox green flow reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific) to samples prior to analysis. Compensation was performed using either Ultracomp eBeads plus compensation beads (Invitrogen). All samples were rewashed in FACs buffer once before being analyzed using a BD LSR-Fortessa X20 cell analyzer. Data were analyzed using the FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Macrophage Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages were blocked with human Fc Block (BD Biosciences) for 10 min at 4°C in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (PBS with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA)). Cells were subsequently stained at 4°C, washed three times with FACS buffer, fixed with 2% PFA in PBS (containing 2% BSA) for 30 min at 4°C and washed three times. Flow cytometry was performed using a BD Fortessa flow cytometer, and all data were analyzed using FlowJo, version 9.9 or higher. The antibodies used for this study were CD14 (clone M5E2, BD Bioscience), CD282 (Toll-like receptor 2 [TLR2], clone 11G7), CD284 (TLR4, clone HTA125), CD88 (clone D53-1473), and CD209 (DC-SIGN, clone DCN46) along with the appropriate isotype controls. Mean fluorescence intensities were calculated by subtracting the mean fluorescence signal of the isotype control signal from the signal of the antibody label.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!