Of the 395 lesions removed by colorectal ESD performed between April 2018 and March 2022, 6 lesions with insufficient description of data on preoperative and/or pathological tumor diameter and 12 lesions with incomplete resection were excluded. Finally, we collected 377 lesions in this study (Figure
1).
ESD indication criteria were based on the Japanese Colorectal ESD/EMR guidelines[4 (
link)]. We mainly used the
PCF-290ZI endoscope (Olympus Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a transparent straight hood (
D-201-12704; Olympus) under carbon dioxide insufflation. A 0.4% sodium hyaluronate solution (
Ksmart; Olympus) diluted five times with normal saline, which included a small amount of indigo carmine, was used for submucosal injection. A mucosal incision was made around the tumor, and submucosal dissection for
en bloc removal was performed using the
DualKnife (KD-655Q; Olympus). A high-frequency generator (
VIO 3; Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) was used during ESD. ST-hood (
DH-29CR; Fujifilm Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), hemostatic forceps (
FD-411QR; Olympus), or other endoscopic devices were used according to the situation. The transanally retrieved specimen was promptly spread, pinned on a sponge board, and immersed into 10% neutral buffered formalin for fixation for histological evaluation by pathologists.
Onda T., Goto O., Otsuka T., Hayasaka Y., Nakagome S., Habu T., Ishikawa Y., Kirita K., Koizumi E., Noda H., Higuchi K., Omori J., Akimoto N, & Iwakiri K. (2024). Tumor size discrepancy between endoscopic and pathological evaluations in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 16(3), 136-147.