The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Humanexome beadchip v1

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

The HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 is a high-density genotyping array designed to assay genetic variants in the human exome. It includes coverage of rare and common variants identified through sequencing of the protein-coding regions of the human genome.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using humanexome beadchip v1

1

Genotyping and Quality Control for CHARGE Cohorts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All four CHARGE cohorts were genotyped for the HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 from Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA). Genotype calling and quality control was performed centrally as described previously [30 (link)]. Each study also performed quality control locally (Supporting methods in S1 Text). Post-analysis quality control on the top results included visual inspection of cluster plots (S1 Fig) and re-genotyping of TM2D3 carriers using a TaqMan assay (genotype calls were 100% validated). TM2D3 variant was genotyped in the AGES-followup cohort using the TaqMan assay. In ADGC and GERAD consortia the SKAP2 and TM2D3 variants were gentoyped on the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 or v1.1 from Illumina (Supporting methods in S1 Text).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TREM2 Variant Genotyping in Alzheimer's Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping was performed in subsets at four centers: NorthShore, Miami, WashU, and CHOP (“CHOP” and “ADC7” datasets) on the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip v1.0. One variant rs75932628 (p.R47H) in TREM2 clustered poorly across all ADGC cohorts, and was therefore re-genotyped using a Taqman assay. Data on all samples underwent standard quality control procedures applied to genome-wide association studies (GWAS), including excluding variants with call rates <95%, and then filtering samples with call rate <95%. Variants with MAF>0.01 were evaluated for departure from HWE and any variants for PHWE<10-6 were excluded. Population substructure within each of the five subsets (NorthShore, Miami, WashU, CHOP, and ADC7) was examined using PC analysis in EIGENSTRAT4 , and population outliers (>6 SD) were excluded from further analyses; the first three PCs were adjusted for as covariates in association testing. Prior to analysis we harmonized the alternate and reference alleles over all datasets. See Supplementary Table 3 for an overview of cohort genotype calling and quality control procedures. All sample genotyping and quality control was performed blind to participant’s disease status.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Whole Exome and SNP Sequencing Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
There are two golden datasets which are used in this paper. In Table 1 the golden dataset consists of 1782 and 2830 whole exome sequenced (WES) data from the AfAm and EuAm ancestry respectively. The WES dataset has been sequenced with 80–100× coverage. The WES gold standard dataset was aligned with the Mercury pipeline [21 (link)] in single sample mode. The second gold standard dataset which we refer to as cSNP, consists of 3533 samples genotyped with HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) querying 247,870 variable sites using standard protocols suggested by the manufacture at the University of Texas Health Science center at Houston [38 (link)]. There are 1683 EuAm samples and 1850 AfAm samples in the gold standard dataset. All true negative sites with missing genotype data are removed from the gold standard. For the sensitivity calculations, all sites common to WGS dataset with greater than 5 % missing genotypes are also removed from further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genotyping and Quality Control for LOAD Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping was performed at Life and Brain, Bonn, Germany, with the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 (N=247,870 variants) or v1.1 (N=242,901 variants). Illumina’s GenTrain version 2.0 clustering algorithm in GenomeStudio or zCall1 was used for genotype calling. Quality control (QC) filters were implemented for sample call rate excluding samples with >1% missingness, excess autosomal heterozygosity excluding outliers based on <1% and >1% minor allele frequency (MAF) separately, gender discordance, relatedness excluding one of each pair related with IBD ≥ 0.125 (the level expected for first cousins), and population outliers (i.e. non European ancestry). Variants were filtered based on call rate excluding variants with >1% missingness, genotype cluster separation excluding variants with a separation score < 0.4 and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) excluding variants with PHWE < 1×10-4. Ten principal components (PCs) were extracted using EIGENSTRAT, including the first three PCs as covariates had the maximum impact on the genomic control inflation factor, λ2. After QC 6,000 LOAD cases and 2,974 elderly controls (version 1.0; 4,093 LOAD cases and 1,599 controls, version 1.1; 1,907 LOAD cases and 1,375 controls) remained. The version 1.0 array had 244,412 variants available for analysis and 239,814 remained for the version 1.1 array.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Exome-wide genotyping protocol for AGES-RS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Study samples were processed on the exome-wide genotyping array Illumina HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 (San Diego, CA, USA) for all AGES-RS participants at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston genotyping center as previously described56 (link). The exome array was enriched for exonic variants selected from over 12,000 individual exome and whole-genome sequences from different study populations38 (link) and includes as well tags for previously described GWAS hits, ancestry informative markers, mitochondrial SNPs, and human leukocyte antigen tags38 (link). A total of 244,883 variants were included on the exome array. Genotype call and quality control filters including call rate, heterozygosity, sex discordance, and principal component analysis outliers were performed as previously described2 (link),21 (link). Variants with call rate <90% or with Hardy–Weinberg P values < 1 × 10−7 were removed from the study. Totally, 76,891 variants were detected in at least one individual of the AGES-RS cohort. Of these variants, 54,469 had a MAF > 0.001 and were examined for association against each of the 4782 human serum protein measurements (see below).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping Workflow for Exome Chip

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were genotyped either at the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR) at Johns Hopkins University on the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 (247,870 variants), or at the Human Genetics Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Houston) on either v1.0 or v1.1 (242,901 variants) (http://www.chargeconsortium.com/main/exomechip) [48 (link)]. Genotypes were called with Illumina’s GenTrain 1.0 (CIDR) or Gentrain 2.0 (Houston) clustering algorithm from the Illumina GenomeStudio v2011.1 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genotyping of rs1800437 in Cohorts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In both cohorts, information on genotype rs1800437 was obtained from genome-wide association study data performed at the Broad genotyping facility using Illumina OmniExpressExome BeadChip v1.0 B (MDC-CC, n = 3344) or Illumina HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 (PPP-Botnia, n = 4905). The call rate was >99.9% and the SNP was in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in both cohorts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Exome Genotyping Quality Control

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Most of the study participants were genotyped using the HumanExome Bead Chip v1.0 (Illumina, Inc. San Diego, CA), and variant calling was performed jointly for AGES, ARIC, CARDIA, CHS, GENOA, and RS at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston [19 (link)]. LBC1921, LBC1936, and CROATIA-Korčula were called in Genome Studio (Illumina Inc.) based on the CHARGE Consortium joint calling cluster file. Quality control procedures included checking concordance with previously collected GWAS genotyping data; exclusion of individuals missing more than 5% of genotypes; population clustering outliers; those with high inbreeding coefficients, rates of heterozygosity, or unexpectedly high identity-by-descent; and participants with gender mismatches. All genetic variants were coded additively with respect to the minor allele in the jointly called dataset. GS:SFHS was genotyped using the HumanExome Bead Chip v1_A and variant calling was performed using GenCall. ASPS genotyping was performed at the Helmholtz Zentrum München using the Illumina HumanExome v1.1 chip and Genome Studio Version V2011.1 software. Samples were excluded if there was contamination with other DNA, sex mismatch, cryptic relatedness, excess heterozygosity, duplicates on the chip or low call rate (<95%). SNPs were excluded based on low call rate (<95%) and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium p value < 10−6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quality Control and Population Structure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed quality control on the jointly-called samples. Individuals were checked for total number of variants, observed number of singletons and doubletons, Ti/Tv ratio, Het/Hom ratio, missingness, contamination with VerifyBamID12 (link), and non-reference concordance with available genotype data from the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip v1.0. Individuals that were outliers (> ± 3*interquartile range) on at least one metric were excluded (Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Figure 1). Population structure was assessed using the multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) algorithm in the PLINK software13 (link) and ten principal components of ancestry were obtained (Supplemental Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Exome Chip Genotyping and Quality Control

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All four CHARGE cohorts were genotyped for the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip v1.0. To increase the quality of the rare variant genotype calls, the genotypes for all four studies were jointly called with 62,266 samples from 11 studies at the University of Texas HSC at Houston3 . Quality control (QC) procedures for the genotype data were performed both centrally at UT Houston and at each study. The central QC procedures have been described previously3 . Minimum QC included: 1) Concordance checking with GWAS data and removal of problematic samples, 2) Removal of individuals with low genotype completion rate (<90%), 3) Removal of variants with low genotype call rate (<95%), 4) Removal of individuals with sex-mismatches, 5) Removal of one individual from duplicate pairs, 6) Removal of first-degree relatives based on genetically calculated relatedness (IBS > 0.45), with cases retained over controls, 7) Removal of variants not called in over 5% of the individuals and those that deviated significantly form the expected Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium proportions (P<1×10-6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!