The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Human genome u133 plus 2

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in China, United States

The Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 is a microarray platform designed for the comprehensive analysis of the human genome. It provides a high-density oligonucleotide array with over 54,000 probe sets, covering more than 47,000 transcripts and variants from over 38,500 well-characterized human genes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

111 protocols using human genome u133 plus 2

1

Batch Normalization of Affymetrix Gene Expression Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MCP datasets and tumor datasets from Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0, Human Genome 133A, and HuGene 1.0 ST arrays were normalized using the frozen robust multiarray average (fRMA) method, implemented in the fRMA R package (version 1.18.0). Unlike RMA, fRMA uses fixed estimates of probe-specific effects and variances, allowing a consistent normalization of gene expression profiles (GEP) from different series, provided that they were obtained on the same gene expression platform.
GEP obtained with the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0, Human Genome 133A, and HuGene 1.0 ST array platforms were thus normalized using the frma function of the frma Bioconductor R package using the preprocessing input vectors provided by the Bioconductor R packages frmahgu133plus2frmavecs version 1.3.0, frma133afrmavecs version 1.3.0, and hugene.1.0.st.v1frmavecs version 1.0.0, respectively. The frma method was called on batches of CEL files corresponding to individual series.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

COPD Transcriptional Profiling in Airways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three datasets (GSE11906, GSE11784, and GSE37147) were used to assess association of COPD status with ABC transporter gene expression profile. GSE11906 and GSE11784 collected epithelial cells from small airways (10th-12th generation) while GSE37147 collected from medium airways (6th-8th generation), with the two different sample types also analyzed on different microarray platforms (Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2 and Affymetrix Human Gene 1 ST, respectively).
In GSE11906, 20 independent samples of epithelial cells were isolated from individuals with >38 pack years smoking history with reported COPD and were compared to 54 independent samples of epithelial cells isolated from individuals with >25 pack years smoking history with no reported COPD18 (link). In GSE11784, 36 independent samples of epithelial cells were isolated from individuals with >34 pack years smoking history with reported COPD and were compared to 72 independent samples of epithelial cells isolated from individuals with >25 pack years smoking history with no reported COPD17 (link). In GSE37147, 87 independent samples of epithelial cells were isolated from individuals with >51 pack years smoking history with reported COPD and were compared to 151 independent samples of epithelial cells isolated from individuals with >47 pack years smoking history with no reported COPD19 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cigarette Smoke Impact on ABC Transporter Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three datasets (GSE11906, GSE11784, and GSE4498), which were all generated from the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2 microarray platform, were used to assess the impact of cigarette smoke exposure on ABC transporter gene expression16 (link)–18 (link). All three datasets are comprised of small airway (10th-12th generation) epithelial cell transcript expression patterns in healthy subjects and those with a history of smoking without a diagnosis of COPD. In GSE11906, 54 independent samples of epithelial cells were isolated from individuals with >25 pack years smoking history with no reported COPD18 (link). In GSE11784, 72 independent samples of epithelial cells were isolated from individuals with >25 pack years smoking history with no reported COPD17 (link). In GSE4498, 10 independent samples of epithelial cells were isolated from individuals with >25 pack years smoking history with no reported COPD16 (link). We independently curated these three GSE datasets to ensure that no samples were repeated across the analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gene Expression Patterns in Human Airways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression patterns of ABCF1 in human airway epithelial cells was determined relative to markers for immune cells (CD34), ABC transporters of known function in airway epithelial cells (ABCC4, ABCC7), and junctions (CDH1) in a dataset containing samples from trachea, large airways (generation 2nd-3rd), and small airways (generation 10th-12th) from healthy subjects (GSE11906, Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2 microarray platform) (Raman et al., 2009 (link)). The following probesets were used to extract gene expression data: ABCF1 (200045_at), ABCC4 (203196_at), ABCC7 (CFTR; 205043_at), CDH1 (201131_s_at), and CD34 (209543_s_at). In cases where more than one probe corresponded to a given gene, the following hierarchy was used to select an individual probe for further use: perfect, unique matches (probes ending in _at or _a_at) were preferred over mismatch or non-unique probes (ending in _s_at or _x_at). GSE11906 included 17 trachea (age−42 +/– 7), 21 large airway (age−42 +/– 9), and 35 small airway samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Analysis of Intracranial Aneurysm and Periodontitis Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First we show the flow chart of this study (Fig. 1). The expression data of IAs and PDs were obtained from the GEO data base (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo). The search strategy for this study included: (1) subject searches for “intracranial aneurysms” and “periodontitis”, respectively; (2) Study type option selection “Expression profiling by array”; (3) samples were obtained from Homo sapiens; (4) the dataset contained normal control group samples. The mRNA sequencing of the data set GSE54083 was based on GPL4133 Agilent-014850 Whole Human Genome Microarray 4 × 44 K G4112F (Feature Number version). The mRNA sequencing of GSE10334 samples was based on GPL570 [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0. The former includes 8 ruptured intracranial aneurysms samples, 5 unruptured aneurysm samples and 10 Superficial temporal artery samples, but the ruptured intracranial aneurysms samples will be excluded in this study. The latter contains 183 PD-affected gingival tissue samples and 64 unaffected gingival tissue samples.

The flow diagram for the whole study

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Preprocessing Microarray Data for CRC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data preprocessing is a data mining technique that involves transforming raw data into an understandable format. The GSE110224 and GSE25070 microarray datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ (accessed on 1 May 2021)). The GSE110224 dataset was based on GPL570 [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array with 34 samples (17 patients with CRC and 17 adjacent samples). The GSE25070 dataset, based on the Illumina HumanRef-8 v3.0 expression bead chip, included 26 CRC samples and 26 adjacent non-tumor colorectal tissue samples. The raw data were corrected and quantile-normalized with the affy package of R 3.4.1 in Bioconductor [8 (link),9 (link)]. The annotation file published by Affymetrix was applied to assign probes to gene IDs and symbols. Data of probe IDs that could not be converted were excluded. Then, the average expression data of identifiers were obtained for each sample. The heatmap was plotted using the pheatmap R package for the CTLA-4 gene in two different CRC datasets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized Genome Profiling Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene profiling was measure by GeneSpring 12.6 using Affymetrix Human Genome U133 plus2.0. All sample files were preprocessed using “justRMA” and standardized as mean = 0 and SD = 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Identifying Critical Genes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify clinically relevant genes that are critical in the pathogenesis of NPC, we reappraised gene expression profiling datasets for NPC versus non-neoplastic nasopharyngeal tissues from the Gene Expression Omnibus, which contains transcriptome and copy number data (GSE34573) obtained using Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 and Mapping 250K Nsp SNP Arrays, respectively. The raw CEL files obtained from Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 and Mapping 250K Nsp SNP Array platforms were imported into Nexus Expression 3 (BioDiscovery, EI Segundo, CA) and Nexus 6 (BioDiscovery) to analyze all probe sets without preselection or filtering, respectively. For the analysis of expression profiling, supervised comparative analysis and functional profiling were performed to identify statistically significant genes that were differentially expressed, with special attention given to the nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide, and nucleic acid metabolic process (GO:0006139). Those genes with P < 0.01 and log2-transformed expression fold change >±0.1 were chosen for validation. For the purpose of exploring the copy number alteration of target genes, Mapping 250K Nsp SNP Arrays was also analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptomic Profiling of Bladder Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RNA of 31 PDX and patient tumors samples were hybridized in three batches in Affymetrix Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 Array Plates (Santa Clara, CA) according to Affymetrix standard protocols. Raw CEL files were RMA-normalized (28 (link)) using R statistical software. PCA confirmed that no batch effect was observed. The arrays were mapped to genes with a Brainarray Custom CDF (Human EntrezG version 24) (29 (link)).
Molecular consensus classes were determined with the “consensusMIBC” R package (v1.1.0, https://github.com/cit-bioinfo/consensusMIBC) using the RMA-normalized transcriptomic data. For WISP, we used a previously published dataset (15 (link)), which contains human MIBC samples (n = 85) also hybridized with Affymetrix Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 according to Affymetrix standard protocols. The raw CEL files used here are available from ArrayExpress (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) under accession number E-MTAB-1803.
Raw CEL files were RMA-normalized using R statistical software. The arrays were mapped to genes with a Brainarray Custom CDF (Human EntrezG version 23) (29 (link))
In both datasets, we obtained a log2-transformed expression matrix with one value per gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Spina Bifida Gene Expression Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database1 was used to obtain gene expression profiles for spina bifida. Exclusion criteria: (1) Profiles based on cell lines and animal models were excluded. Inclusion criteria: (1) Only homo sapiens species samples with spina bifida and healthy controls were included in this study. The GSE4182 dataset was detected on a platform of Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 [HG-U133_Plus_2]. GSE4182 included nine amniotic fluid samples from pregnant women with spina bifida (N = 4) or healthy (N = 5) fetuses. Amniocytes in the amniotic fluid were collected by amniocentesis, from which fetal mRNA was isolated and analyzed. In this study, the expression profile was acquired directly from a public database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!