The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Aperio imagescope software

Manufactured by Leica Biosystems
Sourced in United States, Germany, Canada, Israel, Australia

Aperio ImageScope software is a digital pathology solution that enables the viewing, analysis, and management of digital slide images. It provides a user-friendly interface for healthcare professionals to access and interact with high-resolution digital slides, facilitating efficient workflow and collaboration.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

226 protocols using aperio imagescope software

1

Quantitative Analysis of S-100 Immunostaining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-resolution whole-slide digital scans of S-100 immunostained sections were created with a ScanScope scanner (Aperio Technologies, Inc.). The digital slide images were then viewed and analysed using the viewing and image analysis tools of Aperio ImageScope software (Aperio Technologies, Inc.). Five areas, each with the fixed size of 137,000 µm 2 , were randomly selected per section. To quantify the immunopositive reactions, the colour deconvolution (colour separation) algorithm (Aperio Technologies, Inc.) was set up (by colour calibration) to detect and quantify only the brown colour of DAB positive staining. The algorithm was then run on the selected area to measure the percentage of immunopositive reactions relative to the measured areas. The analysis output results were finally exported to Excel sheets and subjected to statistical analysis to be compared between neonatal and adult rats.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of LMS Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LMS tumors were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h, then embedded with paraffin and subjected to H&E and IHC staining by Research Histology and Tissue Imaging Core at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The antibodies used in this study are shown in Table 2. The IHC analysis was performed using a semi-quantitative score considering the percentage of labeled cells (0, negative; 1, < 10% of the cells; 2, 10–50% of the cells; 3, 50–75% of the cells; 4, > 75% of the cells) and the intensity of the immunostaining (0, no staining; 1, weak; 2, mild; 3, strong staining). The multiplication of both scores resulted in a final quotient ranging from 0 to 12 [25 (link)]. The slides were scanned using the Aperio image scope software (Aperio Technologies, Inc., Vista, VA, USA).

Description and details of antibodies used in this study

AntibodyManufacturerSpecies, monoclonal, or polyclonalApplication and dilutionCatalog number
SMOGeneTexRabbit, polyclonalIHC, 1:400GTX02530
GLI1SigmaRabbit, polyclonalIHC, 1:200ABC217
KI67AbcamRabbit, monoclonalIHC, 1:200ab16667
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Automated Quantification of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Automated counting of TILs on IHC slides was performed as previously reported.[12 (link), 25 (link)] Briefly, slides stained for CD8, CD103 and FoxP3 were scanned using the Aperio ScanScope (Aperio Technologies; Vista, CA, USA), and automated counting was performed using modified nuclear algorithms for IHC in the Aperio ImageScope software (Aperio Technologies). The numbers of intratumoral and stromal CD103+, CD8+ and FoxP3+ TILs per unit area (mm2) were calculated and used for statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Brain Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cases with available tissue, immunohistochemistry with antibodies specific for ATRX (n = 54), H3 K27M (n = 47), IDH1 R132H (n = 45) or BRAF V600E (n = 51) was performed on a Ventana BenchMark XT Immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, Arizona, USA) using established protocols. For dilutions and antibody details, see Online Resource 1.
BRAF V600E, IDH1 R132H and H3 K27M immunohistochemistry was scored as either positive or negative. For all three antibodies, nonspecific staining of macrophages, eosinophilic granular bodies and calcified deposits was excluded from analysis. Staining of vessels or reactive glia was also not considered. Loss of nuclear ATRX expression was scored as specific, if over 80% of tumor cell nuclei showed loss of expression, while nuclei of non-neoplastic cells, such as endothelia, microglia, lymphocytes and reactive astrocytes, were positive. Of note, weak to moderate staining of tumor cell cytoplasm was occasionally seen and was considered as nonspecific [43] (link). Slides were scanned on a NanoZoomer Digital Slide Scanner (Hamamatsu, Japan) and photographed using Aperio ImageScope software (v11.0.2.725, Aperio Technologies, Vista, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Eosinophil Infiltration and Degranulation Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from full thickness mucosa or LSM as previously described13 (link). Paraffin embedded full thickness mucosa was used in immunohistochemistry as previously described13 (link). Infiltrating intact eosinophils and eosinophil degranulation (i.e., the presence of free cytoplasmic granules and/or tissue deposition of eosinophil granule proteins) were assessed by immunohistochemistry using a mouse monoclonal anti-eosinophil peroxidase antibody (EPX-mAb) as previously described38 (link),39 . Tissue sections were digitized (Aperio AT Turbo, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) and images were generated using Aperio ImageScope software (version 11.2.0.780, Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histomorphometric Analysis of Arterial Remodeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After sacrifice, isolated zinc-fixed carotid and femoral arteries were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Serial cross-sections (3 μm) were cut and histomorphometric analysis was performed at 20 cross-section levels (with 66 μm intervals) (Fig. S1).
Sections at each level were stained with Verhoeff-van Gieson or Masson’s trichrome for collagen content and slide images captured using a Hamamatsu Nanozoomer 2.0HT (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). Morphometric analysis was performed using Aperio Imagescope software (Aperio Technologies inc, CA, USA). Percentage intimal expansion throughout the arterial segment was calculated with the following formula: % intimal expansion = ((AI − AL)/AI)) × 100; where AI is the area within the internal elastic lamina and AL is the luminal area. The intima/media (I/M) ratio was calculated with the following formula: I/M ratio = (AI − AL)/(AM − AI); where AM is the area within the external elastic lamina. The media and adventitial areas were also quantified. To determine loss of cells after vascular injury, the total number of cells in media and adventitia were quantified. Serial sections, as depicted in Fig. S1, were quantified to determine the mean % intimal expansion per artery. The number of sections analyzed was an average of 12 (range 9–17) per injured artery and an average of 4 sections (range 3–5) per control artery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CBX6, PCNA, and Ki67

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections and TMAs underwent IHC analyses. Briefly, the slides were probed with primary antibodies specific for the following proteins CBX6, PCNA, and Ki67, and then the slides were treated with anti-rabbit or anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Finally, the slides were stained with diaminobenzidine (DAB) colorimetric reagent solution from Dako (Carpinteria, CA, USA) before undergoing hematoxylin counterstaining (Sigma Chemical Co). TMA analysis was performed by scanning the slides with an AperioScanScope GL, and AperioImageScope software (Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA, USA) was used to assess the scanned images by determining the percentages of positively stained cells and staining intensities. CBX6expression in all the clinical samples was quantified, and the tumor CBX1-8 expression level/peri-tumor CBX1-8 expression level ratio was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Detection of PKM2 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical (IHC) detection was performed routinely. The paraffin sections were dewaxed, hydrated, and fixed prior to incubation with the primary antibody (Supplemental Table S1) at 4 °C overnight. The following day, the secondary antibody (Supplemental Table S1) was incubated with the sections at 37 °C for 30 minutes, which were further incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled avidin at 37 °C for 30 minutes prior to addition of diaminobenzidine. The slides were restained using hematoxylin and dehydrated. The determination of the IHC score was performed with an AperioScanScope GL system (Aperio Technologies) at ×100 magnification using the AperioImageScope software (Aperio Technologies). The percentage of positively stained cells was estimated as follows: The score of 0 to 4 was defined as low PKM2 expression, whereas the score of 4 to 7 was defined as high PKM2 expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemistry of AEG-1, E-cadherin, and Vimentin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections (4 μm) of paraffin-embedded samples were incubated with anti-AEG-1 (1:300) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-E-cadherin (1:200) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or anti-vimentin (1:250) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) primary antibodies. We applied the known positive slice in the SP kit (Maxim-Bio, Fuzhou, China) as a positive control. Sections developed using 3, 3”-diaminobenzidine as the chromogen and hematoxylin as the counterstain. The numbers of positive cells were semi-quantitatively evaluated under a light microscope. The staining index was calculated using Aperio ImageScope software (Aperio Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of YAP Expression in Ovarian Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
YAP expression in ovarian tissues was detected using a peroxidase-based immunohistochemistry, the immunosignal was visualized with DAB kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Sections were scanned with an iSCAN Coreo Slide Scaner (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Oro Valley, AZ, USA). The intensity of the positive signal was quantified using Aperio ImageScope software (Aperio® Technologies, Inc., Vista, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!