The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Amicon centrifuge filter

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Japan

Amicon centrifuge filters are filtration devices used to concentrate and purify macromolecules, such as proteins, enzymes, and nucleic acids, from complex solutions. They work by applying centrifugal force to the sample, which drives the liquid through a semi-permeable membrane, allowing the desired molecules to be retained while smaller components pass through.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using amicon centrifuge filter

1

Quantifying Cellular Uptake of Cy3-SWCNTs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cy3-(GT)6-SWCNTs and Cy3-(GT)30-SWCNTs were first filtered three times using 100 kDa Amicon centrifuge filters (Millipore) to remove free Cy3-DNA from solution. The cells were seeded onto 35 mm glass-bottom Petri dishes (MatTek) to a final concentration of 500 000 cells/dish and allowed to culture overnight in an incubator. The media was removed from each well, replaced with 1 mg/L of filtered Cy3-(GT)6-SWCNTs or Cy3-(GT)30-SWCNTs diluted in media and incubated for 30 min to allow internalization into the cells. The SWCNT-containing media was removed, the cells were rinsed three times with sterile PBS (Gibco), and fresh media was replenished for each sample. The Petri dishes were mounted in a stage incubator (Okolab) on an Olympus IX-73 inverted microscope with a UApo N 100×/1.49 oil immersion objective for epifluorescence imaging with a U-HGLGPS excitation source (Olympus) filtered through a Cy3 filter cube. The fluorescence images were analyzed by extracting average fluorescence intensity values of individual cell ROIs using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fluorescent Dye Release from Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For this assay, an Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488: Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) labeled version of BG was prepared. An amine modified version of BG (BG-NH2) was purchased from New England BioLabs, Inc. (Ipswich, MA) and modified with AF488 according to the manufacture’s instructions to produce AF 488 modified BG (BG-AF488). BG-488 was conjugated to NPCP as described above to produce (NPCP-(BG-AF488)). NPCP-(BG-AF488) (1 mg of Fe/mL) was diluted into PBS at pH 7.4 and acetate buffer at pH 5.0 containing 100 mM glutathione and incubated at 37 °C for 0, 1, 8, and 24 h. CP-(BG-AF488) was separated from NPCP-(BG-AF488) using Amicon centrifuge filters (30 000 MW cutoff, Millipore). Free CP-(BG-AF488) content in the filtrate was determined by fluorescence measurements. Percent CP-(BG-AF488) released from NPCP-(BG-AF488) was calculated using the fluorescence of total amount of drug released over 24 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Luteolin Inhibits S. mutans Amyloid Fibrillization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Inhibition of S. mutans extracellular amyloid fibrillization by luteolin was tested by measuring the ThT fluorescence spectrum. For this, S. mutans strain ATCC 25175 was grown in a biofilm medium supplemented with 0.8% glucose (40 (link)) and cultured overnight at 37°C. After incubation, cells were removed by centrifugation at 7,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant containing extracellular proteins was filtered through a 0.2 μm Nalgene filter, concentrated with 10-kDa-cutoff Amicon centrifuge filters (Millipore) and equilibrated in PBS buffer, pH 7.2. Aliquots of extracellular proteins were stirred at 4°C for 60 h with 50 μg/mL luteolin. Following stirring, ThT was added to the samples to the final concentration of 2 μM, mixed, and incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. Next, 200 μL of samples was transferred to a black-walled 96-well plate, excited at 442 nm, and fluorescent emission spectra were measured from 450 to 650 nm in a Synergy H1 hybrid reader (BioTek). A protein sample stirred in the absence of luteolin served as the positive control. A ThT-only sample was used as the negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DNA-Stabilized Carbon Nanotube Dispersion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HiPco single walled carbon nanotubes (Unidym, HiPco Raw) were suspended with DNA in 1 mL of deionized water with 100 mM NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich) by adding 1 mg raw nanotubes to 2 mg of desalted ss(AT)15 oligonucleotide (Integrated DNA Technologies) in a microcentrifuge tube. The mixture was ultrasonicated using a 1/8″ tapered microtip (Sonics & Materials, Sonics Vibracell) for 30 min at 40% amplitude, with an average power output of 8 W, in a 0 °C temperature-controlled microcentrifuge tube holder. After sonication, the dispersion was ultracentrifuged (Sorvall Discovery 90SE) for 30 min at 250 000g in a fixed-angle rotor (Fiberlite F50L), and the top 80% of the supernatant was extracted. The concentration was determined with a UV/vis/nIR spectrophotometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) using the extinction coefficient A910 = 0.02554 L·mg−1·cm−1.40 (link) To remove free DNA, 100 kDa Amicon centrifuge filters (Millipore) were used. For excitation/emission spectroscopy and cell incubation experiments, the resuspended samples were diluted to 5 mg/L concentration in cell media without serum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Functionalization of Carbon Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MWCNTs (Alfa Aesar), RGO (Graphene Supermarket), and C60 (Alfa Aesar) were dispersed with (GT)15 DNA sequence in 1 mL of 100 mM NaCl, by adding 1 mg of raw nanomaterials to 2 mg of desalted DNA in a microcentrifuge tube. The mixtures were ultrasonicated using a 1/8” tapered microtip for 30 minutes (Only the C60 solution was ultrasonicated for 90 minutes) at 40% amplitude, with an average power output of 8 W, in a 0 °C temperature-controlled microcentrifuge tube holder. The free DNA was removed using 100 kDa Amicon centrifuge filters (Millipore), and the DNA functionalized carbon nanomaterials pellet was resuspended in DI water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluorescence Monitoring of Cy3-DNA-SWCNTs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cy3-(GT)6- or Cy3-(GT)30 oligonucleotides were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies and used in the creation of DNA-SWCNTs (see above). After ultrasonication and ultracentrifugation, the Cy3-DNA-SWCNTs were filtered three times using 100 kDa Amicon centrifuge filters (Millipore) to remove free Cy3-DNA from solution, diluted to 2.5 mg/L, and 1 mL was placed in a plastic cuvette under magnetic stirring. The fluorescence intensity of each sample was obtained in 1 s intervals for 3 min using a PerkinElmer LS 55 fluorescence spectrometer set to 532 nm excitation and 569 nm emission with 3 nm bandwidth. A 10 μL aliquot of a 10% sodium deoxycholate solution (Sigma-Aldrich) was spiked into the Cy3-DNA-SWCNTs after a baseline intensity was established for a final concentration of 0.1% SDC in order to temporally displace the Cy3-DNA from the SWCNTs as previously described.33 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dispersing Carbon Nanotubes with DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbon nanotubes produced by the HiPco process (Unidym, Sunnyvale, CA) were mixed with DNA oligonucleotides (IDT DNA, Coralville, IA) at a 2:1 mass ratio in 1 mL of PBS buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Waltham, MA) and ultrasonicated for 30 minutes at 40% amplitude (Sonics & Materials, Inc.). The DNA sequences used for suspension were GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTTCAGTTTTGCATAGATTTGCACA (GT15miR19), GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ((GT)15-(T)15), and GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ((GT)15-(A)15) all purchased from IDT (Coralville, IA). Following ultrasonication, the dispersions were ultracentrifuged (Sorvall Discovery 90SE) for 30 minutes at 280,000 × g and the top 80% of the supernatant was collected. Absorbance spectra were acquired using a UV/Vis/nIR spectrophotometer (Jasco V-670, Tokyo, Japan). The concentration for HiPco samples was calculated using the extinction coefficient Abs910 = 0.02554 L mg−1cm−1. Excess DNA was removed via 100 kDa Amicon centrifuge filters (Millipore). The DNA-nanotube complexes were re-suspended in PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific Waltham, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNA-Nanotube Complexation and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbon nanotubes produced by the HiPco process (Unidym, Sunnyvale, CA), CoMoCAT process (SG65i grade, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, US), or a combustion process (APT-200, Nano-C, Westwood, MA) were mixed with DNA oligonucleotides (IDT DNA, Coralville, IA) at a 2:1 mass ratio in 1 mL of saline-sodium citrate (SSC) buffer and ultrasonicated for 30 minutes at 40% amplitude (Sonics & Materials, Inc.). The complete list of DNA sequences used for suspension can be found in Supplementary Methods. Following ultrasonication, the dispersions were ultracentrifuged (Sorvall Discovery 90SE) for 30 minutes at 280,000 × g. The top 80% of the supernatant was collected. Absorbance spectra were acquired using a UV/Vis/nIR spectrophotometer (Jasco V-670, Tokyo, Japan). The concentration was calculated using the extinction coefficient Abs910 = 0.02554 L mg−1c−1. To remove free DNA, 100 kDa Amicon centrifuge filters (Millipore) were used. The DNA-nanotube complexes were re-suspended in saline-sodium citrate buffer (G Biosciences, St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DNA-Wrapped Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SWCNTs produced by the HiPco process (Nanointegris) were used throughout the study. SWCNTs were dispersed with single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides in 1 mL of 100 mM NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich), by adding 1 mg of raw nanotubes to 2 mg of desalted (GT)n (n = 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, or 30), (CT)15, or C30 oligonucleotide (Integrated DNA Technologies) in a microcentrifuge tube. The mixtures were ultrasonicated using a 1/8” tapered microtip (Sonics Vibracell; Sonics & Materials) for 30 minutes at 40% amplitude, with an average power output of 8 W, in a 0 °C temperature-controlled microcentrifuge tube holder. After sonication, the dispersion was ultracentrifuged (Sorvall Discovery M120 SE) for 30 minutes at 250,000 g, and the top 80% of the supernatant was extracted. The concentration was determined with a UV/vis/NIR spectrophotometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan), using the extinction coefficient of A910 = 0.0255455 (link) L.mg−1.cm−1. The free DNA was removed using 100 kDa Amicon centrifuge filters (Millipore). For each sample, filtration was repeated 4 times, and the DNA-SWCNTs pellet was resuspended in DI water in each step including the final step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Luteolin Inhibits S. mutans Amyloid Fibrillization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Inhibition of S. mutans extracellular amyloid fibrillization by luteolin was tested by measuring the ThT fluorescence spectrum. For this, S. mutans strain ATCC 25175 was grown in a biofilm medium supplemented with 0.8% glucose (40 (link)) and cultured overnight at 37°C. After incubation, cells were removed by centrifugation at 7,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant containing extracellular proteins was filtered through a 0.2 μm Nalgene filter, concentrated with 10-kDa-cutoff Amicon centrifuge filters (Millipore) and equilibrated in PBS buffer, pH 7.2. Aliquots of extracellular proteins were stirred at 4°C for 60 h with 50 μg/mL luteolin. Following stirring, ThT was added to the samples to the final concentration of 2 μM, mixed, and incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. Next, 200 μL of samples was transferred to a black-walled 96-well plate, excited at 442 nm, and fluorescent emission spectra were measured from 450 to 650 nm in a Synergy H1 hybrid reader (BioTek). A protein sample stirred in the absence of luteolin served as the positive control. A ThT-only sample was used as the negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!