The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti cleaved parp

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

Anti-cleaved PARP is a laboratory reagent used for the detection of cleaved PARP, which is a marker of apoptosis or programmed cell death. This product provides a reliable and specific tool for monitoring cellular apoptosis in various research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using anti cleaved parp

1

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To check for levels of p53 expression and cleaved PARP (indicator of apoptosis), the tissues were sectioned to 14-μm thickness, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and blocked with blocking buffer for 1 hr. This was followed by treating with anti-p53 (Sigma; P 8999) or anti-cleaved PARP (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 44-698G) antibodies overnight in blocking buffer. On subsequent day, the sections were treated with fluorescent secondary antibodies. Sections were imaged on a Zeiss LSM 700-405 confocal microscope.
To check for levels of TNF-α (pro-inflammatory cytokine), ki67 (cell proliferation), CD68 (activated microglia), and cleaved PARP (apoptosis), the tissues were sectioned in 4- to 5-mm blocks and submitted as individual cassettes for paraffin embedding at Emory Winship Pathology Core Lab. Tissues from paraffin-embedded blocks were sectioned at 5-μm thickness. IHC was performed using DAB chromogenic kit (Wako) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Antibodies used were anti-TNF-α (Boster Biologics; PA 1079), anti-p53 (Sigma; P8999), anti-cleaved PARP (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 44-698G), anti-ki67 (Thermo Fisher Scientific; MA5-15690), and anti-CD68 (AbD Serotec; MCA 341R). Whole-slide scanning was done using Hamamatsu’s Nanozoomer 2.0 HT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The relevant procedures have been described in a previous report.20 (link) Proteins were reacted with one of the following: The anti-TG2 antibody (Clones CUB 7402+TG100) purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. The anti-cleaved-PARP (#5625), anti-GRP78 (#3177), anti-t-Akt (#9272), anti-p-Akt Ser473 (#9271), anti-p-ERK (#4370), anti-p-p70S6K Thr389 (#9234), anti-p21 anti-Total H3, and anti-acetyl H3 purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-β-actin (AC-40) obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. The anti-P53 antibody purchased from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark). Anti-mouse immunoglobulin G purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti-SOD2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-18503).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblot Analysis of Autophagy Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples were extracted
in RIPA buffer as described previously.44 (link) LC3B, SQSTM1, LAMP1, cleaved-PARP, and GAPDH levels were analyzed
with anti-LC3B (Cell Signaling, 3868), anti-SQSTM1/p62 (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, 28359), anti-LAMP1 (Cell Signaling, 9091), anticleaved
PARP (Invitrogen, 44-698G), and anti-GADPH (Invitrogen, 398600) specific
antibodies. Immunoblot experiments were performed in TBS-T buffer
containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA). anti-LC3B, anti-SQSTM1,
anti-LAMP1, and anticleaved PARP antibodies were diluted 1:2000 while
anti-GAPDH antibody was diluted 1:100000. Complementary HPR-conjugated
secondary antibodies were diluted 1:10000. Upon reaction with ECL
Star detection reagent (Euroclone, EMP001005), chemiluminescent signals
were acquired with a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Biorad). Optical density
of chemiluminescent signals was quantified using Adobe Photoshop CS6
(version 13.0). Quantifications derived from the average of three
independent experimental replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cisplatin and UD Combination Therapy Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB-231 cells were plated in a 6-well plate at a concentration of 0.7 × 105 cells/mL and incubated overnight. The cells in each well were treated differently: either with DMEM media only (control), with 15 µM cisplatin, with 4% v/v UD alone, or co-treated with 15 µM cisplatin and 4% v/v UD. After 48 h, cells were lysed using the RIPA buffer and protease inhibitor cocktail (MP Biochemical, California, USA). Proteins were collected, and quantification was performed using the Lowry method. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and the gels were blotted onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk and then incubated with primary antibodies: anti-actin (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-Bax (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), anti-Bcl2 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and anti-cleaved Parp (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). After washing, the membranes were treated with the appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membranes were washed again, and images were generated using the Clarity™ Western ECL Substrate on the ChemiDoc machine (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). To quantify blot bands and to calculate the relative expression of proteins, the ImageJ software was used [57 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!