The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

83 protocols using laboratory rodent diet 5001

1

Animal Model of Epilepsy: Welfare and Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and carried out in strict accordance with AAALAC regulations, the US Department of Agriculture Animal Welfare Act, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the NIH. After arrival in the animal facility, female Wistar Unilever rats (180–200 g, 8–10 weeks, Charles River Laboratories, Portage, MI, USA) were housed under controlled environmental conditions (22–24 °C, 40% relative humidity, 12 h dark/light cycle) with free access to tap water and standard Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001 (LabDiet, Richmond, IN, USA). Animals were allowed to adapt to the new environment for at least 1 week before experiments. All epileptic animals were monitored three times daily: once in the morning and once in the evening by laboratory staff, and once during the day by animal facility staff.
Epileptic animals that displayed symptoms that went beyond of exhibiting regular seizures were monitored more closely and obtained individualized care. Specifically, animals that lost weight were given Critical Care animal feed (Oxbow Animal Health, Murdock, NE, USA). Animals that did not recover and kept losing weight were euthanized by CO2 inhalation followed by decapitation. At the end of the experiments, all rats were euthanized by CO2 inhalation followed by decapitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dietary Intervention Study in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experimental procedures involving mice were all approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Brown University under IACUC Protocol Number 1706000283. Four-week-old female C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Mice were habituated for two-weeks following their arrival at Brown University. All animals were cohoused together in specific-pathogen-free (SPF), temperature controlled (21 + 1.1 °C), 30–70%v humidity, and 12 h light/dark cycling conditions. Mice were randomized into new cages following the habituation period. Mice were given the specified diets in powdered form. Mice used in (Supplementary Fig. 9a–f) for redox potential measurements were given the typical laboratory chow (Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001, LabDiet, St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ethical Animal Experiments and Human Consent

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Animal Care Committee of the Universities of Morehouse School of Medicine (Atlanta, GA, USA), and conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals produced by the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA). The present study meets the ARRIVE guidelines requirements for reporting (www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines). Animals were housed in the Center for Laboratory Animal Resources of Morehouse School of Medicine. Transgenic CRP rats were maintained under a 12-h light-dark cycle with ad libitum access to water and a standard rat chow diet (Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001; LabDiet, St. Louis, MO, USA). The animal room temperature was maintained at 22±3°C, relative humidity was held at 30–70%, and air was exchanged 15 times/h.
The informed consent procedure of human experiments applied at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Xi'an, China) was in accordance with the approved guidelines. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Xi'an Jiaotong University, and written informed consent was obtained from patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Diet-induced Obesity in Wistar Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiments were conducted in 5-weeks old Wistar male rats with initial weight of 135-140 g. The animals were housed and handled in animal facility after approval of scientific council of T. Shevchenko Kiev National University according to EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animals. The animals of each experimental group were housed in polypropylene cages in an environmentally controlled clean air rooms. They were adapted for a week and feed with a SD (standard diet) consisting of 6.7% fat, 21% protein and 55.1% of carbohydrate (15.27 kJ/g, Laboratory Rodent Diet #5001, LabDiet ) and water ad libitum and then the rats were divided in two matched groups: control (continued to be fed with a SD) and fed with HCD (high calorie diet) consisted of 60% of a SD with 10% of pork fat, 10% eggs, 9% sucrose, 5% peanuts, 5% dry milk, 1% of vegetable oil (38.8% total fat, 28.71 kJ/g) [28 (link)]. Calorie consumption was calculated per each cage (5 rats) per day based on daily food consumption.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nude Mice Xenograft Model for OSCC-CSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All procedures involving animals were in accordance with the institutional animal welfare guidelines of the Chung Shan Medical University. For the nude mice xenograft model, 5-6 weeks old immuno-deficient nude mice (BALB/c nu/nu mice) weighing 18-22 g were used. The mice were housed with a regular 12 h light/12 h dark cycle and ad libitum access to standard rodent chow diet (Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001, LabDiet, St. Louis, MO) and were kept in a pathogen-free environment at the Laboratory Animal Unit. OSCC-CSCs (1×104cells/0.2 mL/mouse) were injected subcutaneously into the right front axilla. 14 days postimplantation, the mice were randomly divided into three groups (N = 5 for each group) and fed by oral gavage with water (control) and EGCG (20 and 40 mg/day/kg). The day of cell implantation was designated day 0. Imaging measurement was performed using an IVIS50 animal imaging system (Xenogen Corp.). The volume was calculated (according to the following formula: [length × width2]/2), and then analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software. Body weight was assessed daily after cell injection. After 26 days, the animals were euthanized, and the primary tumors were weighed and for miR-204 analysis [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Conditional Rictor Knockout Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animal procedures conducted at the William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (Assurance ID: D16-00403). Mice were multiply housed in microisolator cages and maintained under 12 hr light/dark cycles, and were fed Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001 (LabDiet). Mice hemizygous for Albumin-Cre and homozygous for a floxed allele of Rictor mice were obtained by crossing RictorL/L mice on a C57BL/6J background (Lamming et al., 2012 (link)), obtained from the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Cambridge, MA) and rederived by embryo transfer at the UW-Madison Biotechnology Center, with Albumin-Cre mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Stock 003574 Postic et al., 1999 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Behavioral Study of Female Rat Feeding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forty-eight female Long-Evans rats, weighing 126 – 150 g (approximately 6 weeks) (Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Malvern, PA) were housed in an AAALAC-accredited facility, on a 12-hour light/dark cycle (lights off at 0900 h). Throughout the experiment, they were individually housed in polycarbonate cages, with Beta Chip® bedding, and one Bed-r’Nest nestlet (The Andersons, Inc, Maumee, OH). They were given one week to acclimate to the facility and were handled daily prior to the start of experiments. In the home cage, all animals received ad libitum chow (Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001, Lab Diet, St. Louis, MO) via metal food hoppers and water via 16 oz Macrolon bottles (Ancare, Bellmore, NY) with non-drip sipper tubes. In the operant chambers, in addition to access to the palatable diet, animals had ad libitum access to water. All animals were weighed in the afternoon on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday throughout the experiment. Experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Drexel University College of Medicine and followed the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Habituation and Randomization of C57BL/6J Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experimental procedures involving mice were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Brown University. Five-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and given a two-week habituation period immediately following their arrival at Brown University. All animals were cohoused together in specific-pathogen-free (SPF), temperature controlled (21 ± 1.1°C), and 12-hour light/dark cycling conditions within Brown University’s animal care facility, while being fed a standard chow (Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001, LabDiet, St. Louis, MO, USA). After habituation, mice were randomized into new cages to reduce potential cage effects.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Siberian Hamster Husbandry and Housing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult (> 60 days of age) male Siberian hamsters (n = 63) were obtained from our breeding colony at Indiana University. All animals were initially group housed (2–5 per cage with same sex siblings on weaning at 17–18 days of age) in long-day photoperiods (light:dark (L:D) 16:8) and then individually housed in polypropylene cages (27.8 × 17.5 × 13.0 cm) for one week prior to the start of the experiment. Animals were housed in long-day photoperiods for the entirety of the study. Food (Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001, LabDiet, St. Louis, MO, USA) and water were available ad libitum prior to and throughout the experiment. Temperature (20 ± 2°C) and humidity (50 ± 10%) were maintained at constant levels. All animal methods were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Indiana University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Generating Transgenic fat-1 Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transgenic fat-1 mice were generated as described previously22 (link) and backcrossed onto a C57BL/6 background. Heterozygous fat-1 mice were then mated to obtain wild-type (WT) and fat-1 littermates. The phenotype of the fat-1 mice (as indicated by increased tissue n-3 PUFA) was confirmed by fatty acid analysis using gas chromatography (GC) and the mice were bred at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) animal facility. In addition, a subset of 8-month-old male C57BL/6 WT mice was purchased from Charles River Laboratories. Mice were housed in a biosafety level 2 room in hard top cages with two or three mice per cage. Mice were maintained in a temperature-controlled room (22–24 °C) with a 12-h light/12-h dark diurnal cycle, and allowed for food and water ad libitum. Normally, mice were maintained on a chow diet (Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001) from LabDiet. Fat-1 mice and their WT littermates were fed a diet high in n-6 PUFA (AIN-76A with 10% corn oil) from LabDiet. The group of mice supplemented with n-3 PUFA was fed an AIN-76A diet with 5% corn oil and 5% fish oil, from Harlan Laboratories. Supplementary Table S2 shows the detailed nutrient composition and n-6/n-3 fatty acid profiles of all diets used. All animal procedures in this study were carried out in accordance with the guidelines approved by the MGH Subcommittee on Research Animal Care.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!