The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using ltq orbitrap velos instrument

1

Crosslinking and Mass Spectrometry of Parkin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The coomassie stained SDS-PAGE band corresponding to the Parkin labeled with probe 7 was excised, dehydrated and resuspended using standard procedures. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on an LTQ Orbitrap Velos instrument (Thermo Scientific) coupled to an Ultimate nanoflow HPLC system (Dionex). A gradient running from 3 % solvent A to 60 % solvent B over 45 min was applied (solvent A = 0.1 % formic acid in H2O; solvent B = 0.08 % formic acid in 80 % MeCN). Fragment ions were generated by CID and 1+ and 2+ precursor ions were excluded. Thermo .raw data was converted to .mgf format using the MSConvert software (ProteoWizard). Raw data was searched using the pLink software against UBE2L3* and Parkin sequences with trypsin specificity (up to 3 missed cleavages)59 (link). A crosslinker monoisotopic mass of 307.1644 was manually added which accounted for the theoretical mass difference associated with formation of a bisthioether between 2 Cys residues together with the acrylate AVS, the triazole linkage and the tryptic Leu73 remnant from the Ub C-terminus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of HepG2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HepG2-HBc and HepG2-3 × Flag cells were maintained in SILAC DMEM (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% dialysed FBS and either light [12C6]-L-lysine or heavy[13C6]-L-lysine (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Tewksbury, MA, USA) for stable isotope labelling. Equal amounts of protein from HepG2-HBc/HepG2-3 × Flagcells ([12C6]-L-lysine) and HepG2-3 × Flag/HepG2-HBc cells ([13C6]-L-lysine) were mixed and resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. Each lane was cut into approximately 1 mm3 and digested with trypsin. The digested peptides were identified using an LTQ-OrbitrapVelos instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). All MS and MS/MS raw data were analysed and processed with MaxQuant (version1.4.7) for peptide identification and quantification44 (link). The Andromeda search engine was run against the NCBI database (Refseq20121107)45 (link). The maximal mass tolerance in MS mode was set to 20 ppm for the first search and 6 ppm for the main search, and that in MS/MS mode was set to 0.7 Da. The maximum false discovery rates (FDR) for peptide and protein identifications were specified as 0.01.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One microliter of sample was injected
onto a NanoLC-Ultra 2D HPLC (Eksigent, Dublin, CA) system equipped
with a 5 μL injection loop. Separation was performed with a
capillary column (75 μm ID, 10 cm length, 15 μm orifice)
created by hand packing a commercially available fused-silica emitter
(New Objective, Woburn MA) with 5 μm Luna C18 bonded separation
media (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA). The flow rate was 1000 nL/min for
5.5 min, then decreased to 300 nL/min with a 40 min linear gradient
of 2 to 30% CH3CN in 5 mM NH4OAc aqueous buffer
(pH 6.8), followed by a 5:95 buffer/CH3CN hold for 10 min
and a 5 min re-equilibration at 1000 nL/min 98:2 buffer/CH3CN. The injection valve was switched at 6 min to remove the sample
loop from the flow path during the gradient. Samples were analyzed
by nanoelectrospray using an LTQ Orbitrap Velos instrument (Thermo
Scientific, Waltham, MA). The nanoelectrospray source voltage was
set at 1.6 kV, and the capillary temperature was 350 °C. The
ion focusing and transfer elements of the instrument were adjusted
for maximum signal intensity by using the automated instrument tuning
feature while monitoring the background ion signal of m/z = 371.1 amu (decamethylcyclopentasiloxane)
to create the tune file used for data analysis. This resulted in an
S-Lens RF level setting of 62%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Peptide Purification and LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples for MS measurements were purified via C18 tips as described by the manufacturer (Thermo Fisher). Adjusting an equal peptide concentration for all samples was achieved by Nanodrop analysis (Peqlan, Erlangen, Germany) and monolithic HPLC analysis (Agilent, California, USA). LC-ESI MS/MS measurements were performed on a LTQ Orbitrap Velosinstrument (Thermo Fisher) combined with Dionex UltiMateTM 3000- Rapid Separation Liquid Chromatography System (Thermo Scientific). For pre-concentration of peptides a reversed-phase trapping column (Acclaim PepMap RSLC 100 μm × 2 cm, 3 μm particle size, 100 Å pore size, Dionex) in 0.1% TFA was used. For separation of peptides on a 75 μm RP column (RSLC 75 μm × 25 cm, 2 μm particle size, 100 Å pore size) and a gradient (A 0.1% Formic acid (FA) and B 0.1% FA 84% ACN) ranging from 5 to 50% of solution B at a flow rate of 300 nL/min in 90 min. MS survey scans were acquired from 300 to 2,000 m/z at a resolution of 30,000 using the polysiloxane m/z 371.101236 as lock mass [49].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After reduction and alkylation, protein samples were treated with endoprotease Lys‐C (Wako) and trypsin (Trypsin Gold Mass Spec Grade; Promega). Peptide samples were desalted by OMIX C18 pipette tips (Agilent Technologies) and then analyzed by LC‐MS/MS on an LTQ‐Orbitrap velos instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected online to an EASY‐nLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Raw mass spectrometry (MS) data from the LTQ‐Orbitrap were analyzed using MaxQuant software (Cox & Mann, 2008 (link)) version 1.6.10.43, which uses Andromeda search engine (Cox et al2011 (link)). Bioinformatic analysis of the MaxQuant/Andromeda workflow output and the analysis of the abundances of the identified proteins were performed with the Perseus module (Tyanova et al2016 (link)) version 1.6.10.43. Only protein identifications based on a minimum of two peptides were selected for further quantitative studies. After data processing, label‐free quantification (LFQ) values from the “proteinGroups.txt” output file of MaxQuant were further analyzed. To distinguish specifically enriched proteins from the background, protein abundances were compared between sample and control groups using Student’s t‐test statistic, and results were visualized as volcano plots (Hubner & Mann, 2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of TAL in Biological Matrices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TAL was extracted from cell lysate, brain homogenate or plasma with cold ethyl acetate. The organic supernatant was dried with nitrogen, and the sample was reconstituted in 50 μL of 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate in acetonitrile (mobile phase). Five μL samples were injected onto the column (Agilent Zorbax SB C18 5um; 150 X 0.5 mm), and LC/MS-MS was performed on an LTQ Orbitrap Velos instrument (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) interfaced with a Nano2D–LC HPLC (Eksigent, Dublin, CA) using positive electrospray ionization. Separation on the column was performed using a linear gradient (relative acetonitrile to 5 mM ammonium acetate concentrations varied between 20–90%) at a mobile phase flow rate of 15 μL/min. Analysis was performed using accurate mass extracted ion chromatograms of m/z 285.08997+ and 298.07922+ (parent ion m/z 381.1) for TAL with a mass tolerance of 2 ppm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Urine Metabolite Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Urine sample preparation for LC-MS analysis was performed as we previously reported19 (link). Briefly, the urine samples were thawed at room temperature. 100 μl of each thawed urine sample was precipitated by 100 μl of methanol. The mixture was then centrifuged under 14000 g for 10 minutes at 4 °C, and the supernatant was used for LC-MS analysis.
Each 10 μL aliquot of extract was injected into a Shimadzu Prominence LC system (Shimadzu) coupled online to an LTQ Orbitrap Velos instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) set at 30000 resolution (at m/z 400). Both positive and negative ion modes were used for sample analysis. The mass scanning range was 50–1000 m/z and the capillary temperature was 350 °C. Nitrogen sheath gas was set at a flow rate of 30 L/min. Nitrogen auxiliary gas was set at a flow rate of 10 L/min. Spray voltage was set to 4.5 kV and 3.0 kV for positive or negative ion mode, respectively. The LC-MS system was run in binary gradient mode. Solvent A was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid/water and solvent B was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid/methanol. The flow rate was 0.2 ml/min. A C-18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 3.5 μm, Agilent, USA) was used for all analysis. The linear gradient was as follows: 5% B at 0 min, 5% B at 5 min, 100% B at 8 min, 100% B at 9 min, 5% B at 18 min and 5% B at 20 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Targeted LC-MS/MS Peptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each LC-MS/MS run, 10 nmol of the reaction mix from the previous section dissolved in 10 µL 0.1% formic acid was used. Samples were loaded using the autoinjector unit of a nanoAcquityTM ultra performance LC system (Waters). Each sample was first loaded onto a pre-column (nanoAcquity 10K 2G V/M trap column, C18, 5 μm, 180 μm × 20 mm) at a flow rate of 10 µL/min. Peptides were then separated using a separating column (Nikkyo Technos Co. Ltd., Tokio, Japan, C18, 5 μm, 100 μm × 150 mm) at a flow rate of 0.4 μL/min. Separations were performed at 20 °C and the pressure range was 900–1000 psi. The composition of solvent A was aqueous 0.1% formic acid and the composition of solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (ACN, product number 900667). The solvent gradient was 1% B (0–1 min), 1–60% B (1–15 min), 60–90% B (15–15.01 min), 90% B (15.01–20 min), 1% B (20–30 min). MS/MS analysis was performed using an LTQ Orbitrap Velos instrument (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The MS1 m/z scan range was 300–2000 Da. The 20 most abundant precursor ions from each MS scan were isolated for MS2 analysis and fragmented via CID with helium gas using a collision energy setting of 35. Fragmentation analysis occurred in the linear ion trap with a mass accuracy window of ±0.8 Da.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Peptide Separation and Identification by Nano LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptides were injected into the loop of an Eksogent nano LC-ultra 1D plus HPLC system equipped with a C18 column (200 mm home-made Altima C18 analytical column, 100 μm ID 3 μm particle size). Peptides were separated using a linear gradient of 5% solvent A (0.1% acidic acid, 5% ACN) and 45% solvent B (0.1% acidic acid, 80% ACN) in 50 min. The LC system was directly coupled inline with an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The LTQ-Orbitrap was set to data-dependent mode to switch automatically between MS and MS/MS. MS spectra range from 330 until 2000 m/z can be acquired in the Orbitrap at an FWHM resolution of 30,000 after accumulation to 500,000 in the linear ion trap with one microscan. The five most abundant precursor ions were selected for fragmentation by CID with an isolation width of 2 DA. CID was performed in the linear ion trap after accumulation to 50,000 with 1 microscan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Separation and Analysis of ctDNA by nanoLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2.5 μg (ctDNA samples) or 1.5–4.6 μg (HT-29 samples) of DNA was injected onto a NanoLC-Ultra 2D HPLC (Eksigent, Dublin, CA) system equipped with a 5 μL injection loop. Separation was performed with a capillary column (75 μm ID, 10 cm length, 15 μm orifice) created by hand packing a commercially available fused-silica emitter (New Objective, Woburn MA) with 5 μm Luna C18 bonded separation media (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA). The flow rate was 1000 nL/min for 5 min, then decreased to 300 nL/min with a 50 min linear gradient from 2 to 98% CH3CN in 5 mM NH4OAc aqueous buffer (pH 6.8) with a 5 min hold and a 5 min re-equilibration at 1000 nL/min 98:2 buffer/CH3CN. The injection valve was switched at 6 min to remove the sample loop from the flow path during the gradient. Samples were analyzed by nanoelectrospray using an LTQ Orbitrap Velos instrument (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). The nanoelectrospray source voltage was 2.0 kV, and the capillary temperature was 350 °C. The ion focusing and transfer elements of the instrument were adjusted for maximum signal intensity by using the automated instrument tuning feature while monitoring the background ion signal of m/z 371.1 (decamethylcyclopentasiloxane) to create the tune file used for data analysis. This resulted in an S-Lens RF level setting of 49%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!