The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using massarray iplex

1

Genetic Factors in Aspirin-Induced Peptic Ulcer Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From the total number of patients recruited, 515 self-reported white European patients with endoscopically confirmed PUD (206 cases) and 309 controls (124 control group A, 185 control group B) were included in the replication cohort. Cases and controls included in the replication cohort were recruited later than those included in the discovery cohort. Lead variants with a p-value below 5*10−6 in a clear delineated LD block in the association with aspirin-induced PUD in the discovery cohort were subsequently typed in the replication cohort using the Agena MassArray iPLEX platform (Agena Bioscience Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocols and subsequently tested in using the same logistic regression model and methodology in SNPTEST as previously described. SNPs were excluded when MAF<0·01, call rate <95% and HWE p>0·0001 [exact test]. Samples were excluded if genotyping call rate <90%. Meta-analysis combining the association summary data of both cohorts was undertaken under an inverse-variance weighted fixed-effects model using GWAMA [32] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping of SNPs with MassARRAY iPLEX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using GoldMag‐Mini Whole Blood Genomic DNA Purification Kits (GoldMag Co. Ltd., Xi'an City, China), and quantified with a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). To have sufficient DNA for further reactions, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was applied to each sample. Then SAP purification was performed to remove the remaining dNTP and amplified primers in PCR products. Using a MassARRAY Nanodispenser (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA), standardized genotyping reactions were dispensed onto a 384‐well spectroCHIP. The repeated control samples were set in every genotyping plate and the concordance was more than 99%. The genotyping of these SNPs was carried out on the MassARRAY iPLEX (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA) platform using the allele‐specific matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization‐time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF‐MS). Genotyping results were outputted by Agena Bioscience TYPER 4.0. Haploview software package (version 4.2) was used to analyze the linkage disequilibrium (LD), haplotype construction, genetic association at polymorphism loci and haplotype blocks were defined according to the criteria laid out by Gabriel and others.25
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genotyping of ITPR2 Gene Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the database of 1,000 Genomes Project (http://www.1000genomes.org/) and dbSNP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/), candidate SNPs in the ITPR2 gene with minor allele frequencies (MAFs)> 5% in the global population were selected. A total of eight SNPs (rs1049376, rs11048526, rs11048556, rs11048585, rs16931011, rs10842759, rs2230372, and rs7134213) were selected for further genotyping.
Peripheral blood samples (5 ml) were obtained from each participant. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood of cases and controls using the GoldMag‐Mini whole blood Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GoldMag Co. Ltd., Xi'an city, China), as recommended by the manufacturer's instructions (Geng et al., 2015). DNA concentration was determined by the NanoDrop Lite spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) (Wang et al., 2015). MassARRAY Nanodispenser (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA) was used to design primers for amplification process and single base extension reactions (Jin et al., 2015). SNP genotyping was carried out on the MassARRAY iPLEX (Agena Bioscience, SanDiego, CA) platform. Agena Bioscience Typer 4.0 software was used to manage and analyze SNP genotypic data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

APOE Genotyping from Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
APOE genotypes (ε2, ε3, ε4 alleles) were determined at the University of California Los Angeles Biological Samples Processing Core. DNA was extracted from frozen brain tissue samples. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping (rs429358 and rs7412) was conducted on the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, California, USA), as previously described [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Whole Blood DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted by whole blood genome DNA purification kit (Xi’an GoldMag Biological Company). The concentration and purity of DNA were detected by Nanodrop Lite ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Genotyping of all SNPs was performed on Mass ARRAY iPLEX (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) platform using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer. The results were output by Agena Bioscience TYPER 4.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Variants in CHRNA5: Exploring Function and Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On the basis of the dbSNP database, we randomly selected eight candidate polymorphisms (rs667282, rs16969948, rs588765, rs6495306, rs17486278, rs680244, rs569207, and rs692780) in CHRNA5 (its GenBank reference is NC_000015.10). Each SNP had minor allele frequency (MAF)> 5% in the global population from 1,000 Genome Projects (http://www.internationalgenome.org/). Then Regulome DB (http://www.regulomedb.org/) and HaploReg were utilized to predict the function of SNPs. We used the Genotype‐Tissue Expression (GTEx) projects (https://gtexportal.org/home/) expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) variants to assess the effects of schizophrenia‐associated SNPs on gene expression. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples using the GoldMag‐Mini Whole Blood Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GoldMag Ltd. Xi'an City, Shaanxi, China). NanoDrop2000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was used to check the quantification of the extracted DNA at a wavelength value of A260 nm. We used the Agena MassARRAY Assay Design 3.0 Software (San Diego, CA) to design Multiplexed SNP MassEXTEND assays and genotyped the variants using the MassARRAY iPLEX (Agena Bioscience) platform using the matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization‐time of flight (MALDITOF). Data management and analysis was conducted by the Agena Typer 4.0 software (San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genotyping of COL6A4P2 Gene SNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five candidate SNPs in the COL6A4P2 gene were selected with a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.05 from the global population in the 1,000 Genome Projects (http://www.internationalgenome.org/). We then used HaploReg v4.1 (https://pubs.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/haploreg.php) to predict the possible functions of the SNPs. The primers for amplification and single-base extension were designed using the Assay Design Suite, V2.0 (https://agenacx.com/online-tools/). Genotyping of the five SNPs was carried out on the MassARRAY iPLEX (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) platform using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry [17 (link)]. Genotyping results were generated using Agena Bioscience TYPER software, version 4.0. Genotyping was performed by laboratory personnel in a double-blinded manner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genotyping Melanoma-Associated SNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNPs were selected, as described [3 (link)], based on their association with melanoma in other studies and genotyped from buccal swab DNA using the MassArray iPLEX assay (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA; previously known as Sequenom) with reported quality control measures [41 (link)]. The staff running assays were blinded to outcomes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SNP Genotyping Using MALDI-TOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genotyping of the 11 SNPs was carried out on the MassARRAY iPLEX (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) platform using the matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization‐time of flight (MALDITOF) (Lin et al., 2017; Liu, Wang, et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018). Genotyping results were output by Agena Bioscience TYPER version 4.0 software. Genotyping was carried out by laboratory personnel in a double‐blinded fashion. The PCR primers for the SNPs were shown in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

COL6A4P2 Gene Variants Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five candidate SNPs in the COL6A4P2 gene were selected with a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.05 from global population in the 1,000 Genome Projects (http://www.internationalgenome.org/). Then we used HaploReg v4.1 (https://pubs.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/haploreg.php) to predict the possible functions of SNPs. The primers for ampli cation and single-base extension were designed using the Assay Design Suite, V2.0 (https://agenacx.com/online-tools/). Genotyping of the ve SNPs was carried out on MassARRAY iPLEX (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) platform using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of ight mass spectrometry (17) . Genotyping results were generated using Agena Bioscience TYPER software, version 4.0. Genotyping was carried out by laboratory personnel in a double-blinded fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!