The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pap pen

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in Denmark

The PAP pen is a laboratory equipment designed for the application of Pap test samples onto microscope slides. It provides a consistent and controlled method for spreading cells onto the slide surface, ensuring optimal sample preparation for cytological analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using pap pen

1

Quantifying β-Galactosidase Activity in Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung tissue was snap frozen in OCT Tissue-Tek compound and cut into 8-μm-thick sections. Sections were fixed in 0.2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min at 4°C. Slides were then washed three times in LacZ washing buffer (PBS, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% sodium deoxycholate, 0.02% NP-40) at room temperature. Subsequently, sections were circled with a PAP pen (DAKO) and incubated at 37°C overnight with staining solution (5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.5 mg/ml X-Gal in LacZ washing buffer) in a humidified chamber. The next day, slides were washed for 5 min in PBS and double-distilled H2O, respectively. Sections were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red (Sigma-Aldrich) according to manufacturer’s instructions and mounted with Histokitt II (Carl Roth). Tissue sections were imaged with a Hamamatsu NanoZoomer digital slide scanner, and β-Gal+ cells on the complete section were quantified using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining for CLEC2D Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining was performed using the Envision FLEX mini kit, high pH, (DAKO, Denmark) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Antigen retrieval was achieved by preheating (5 min) and incubating in a target retrieval solution (Envision FLEX DAKO, Denmark) for 20 min at 95 °C. Slides were rinsed and washed in wash buffer (5 min). Post encircling sections with a de-limiting pen (pap pen; DAKO, Denmark), endogenous peroxidase was blocked (5 min). Thereafter, sections were incubated in the primary CLEC2D antibody for 2 h (Abcam, ab197341;1:200; diluent-DAKO REAL diluent) at room temperature. Post washing, the sections were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (20 min.). Detection of immunoreactivity was performed with diamino-benzidine (DAKO, Denmark). All sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted. Negative controls were performed by replacing the primary antibody with non-immune sera of the same IgG isotype as the primary antibody. The primary antibody was replaced with PBS in buffer controls. Thyroid cancer served as the positive control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Molecular Biology Reagents and Cell Culture Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T4 polynucleotide kinase, Phi29 DNA polymerase, T4 DNA ligase, exonuclease I (ExoI), and exonuclease III (ExoIII) were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Slangerup, Danmark). All oligonucleotides were obtained from DNA Technology A/S (Aarhus, Denmark). CodeLink Activated Slides came from SurModics (Eden Prairie, MN, USA), and Vectashield was from Vector Laboratories (Peterborough, UK). Pap Pen was purchased from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark), CPT was from Sigma-Aldrich (Broenby, Denmark). Cell culture media (Minimum Essential Medium and McCoy 5A medium), Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA (25200-056), Non-Essential Amino Acid (11140-050) and PenStrep (15140-122) stock were obtained from Invitrogen (Naerum, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Detailed Protocol for Cell Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phi29 DNA polymerase was purchased from MBI Fermentas. CodeLink Activated Slides were purchased from SurModics Inc. (USA), and Vectashield was from Vector Laboratories Inc. (USA). CD44 MicroBeads (human), FcR Blocking Reagent (human), CD44-PE Antibody (human), CD133-PE Antibody (human), Casein Kinase II (CK2) and alkaline phosphatase from calf intestine were purchased from New England BioLabs Ltd. (UK). Pap Pen was purchased from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark).
MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) reagent (M5655) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich ApS (Denmark), dissolved in phenol red MEM at a final concentration of 5 mg/ml, sterilized using 0.22 µm filter and stored at −20°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescent Staining of Engineered Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following 5 days of treatment, each engineered muscle was washed with PBS and fixed using ice cold methanol; acetone solution. Subsequently, engineered muscle constructs were cut away from the sutures and placed on poly‐lysine coated microscope slides (VWR, Leicestershire, UK) and ringed with PAP pen (DAKO, Cambridgeshire, UK). Constructs were blocked with 1× Tris buffered saline (TBS; 0.5 M) containing 5% goat serum (Sigma–Aldrich) and 0.2% Triton‐x‐100 (Fisher Scientific) for 90 min. Following three washes with TBS, constructs were incubated overnight in a humidified staining chamber with rabbit polyclonal anti‐desmin primary antibody (Abcam, Cambridgeshire, UK) diluted 1:200 in TBS. After overnight incubation, constructs were washed three times in TBS and incubated for 3 hr with goat anti‐rabbit TRITC secondary antibody (Abcam) diluted 1:200 in TBS, and DAPI (Sigma–Aldrich) in order to visualize nuclei. Following three further washes in distilled water, constructs were mounted on glass coverslips using a drop of Fluoromount™ (Sigma–Aldrich) mounting medium. Engineered muscle constructs were imaged using a Zeiss LSM‐710 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Cambridgeshire, UK) and were analyzed using Image J software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for Bacterial Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hybridization was performed using the probe EUB338 labeled with Cy3, whose sequence is complementary to the sequence of a region within the 16S rRNA that is common to all eubacteria as well as the mixture probe, EUB338 I, II, III. The complementary probe non-EUB338 labeled with Cy3 was used as control. Tissue sections were prepared using sterile microtome equipment and deparaffinized in coplin jars by two changes of xylene and dehydrated twice with 99.9% ethanol for 3 min at each step. Slides were air dried and a circle was drawn around the tissue section using a hydrophobic pen (Dako PAP pen; Glostrup, Denmark). The hybridization and washing steps were performed as previously reported [22] . Fixed samples were hybridized by the application of 10 ml of hybridization buffer containing 5 ng of each specific oligonucleotide probe at 45°C for 90 min. Stringent washing was performed by incubating the slide in washing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 112 mM NaCl) at 48°C for 15 min. Finally, the slides were rinsed with water, stained with DAPI, air dried, and mounted in Citifluor (Citifluor Ltd., London, United Kingdom). Slides were examined using a Nikon fluorescent microscope equipped with a standard filter set (Nikon, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Paper-based ELISA Protocol for Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whatman No. 1 chromatograhy paper (GE) was used. Test spots were created by coating areas around each spot with hydrophobic barrier using a PAP pen (Dako) or using a Xerox ColorQube 8570 (solid ink printer) and reflowing on a hot plate (for 3 minutes at 160 °C). Paper test spots were designed in Adobe Illustrator. For quantification, all measurements were performed at least twice.
The assay was performed by first adding the detection antibody (3 μL; GeneTex for anti-fluorescein, Life Technologies for anti-DNP), followed by a wash using PBS with 1% (w/v) Tween 80. Spots were blocked using PBS with 3% BSA (w/v). After another round of washes, samples or ladder reporters were added, allowed to incubate, and washed. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) conjugated to streptavidin (Pierce) was added and incubated. Finally, the ALP substrate, BCIP/NBT (Pierce) was added, which upon exposure to ALP forms a purple precipitate. Paper ELISAs were scanned using a desktop scanner and quantified using ImageJ or a custom MATLAB script (see below).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of Mouse Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse tissue samples were fixed with 4% PFA overnight and paraffin embedded. Paraffin embedded sections were processed with xylene, ethanol dehydration series, rinsed in PBS then dH20, incubated 20 min at 100°C in 1x in citrate buffer pH 6.0 (citrate buffer: 321mM sodium citrate, 79.84mM citric acid monohydrate), cooled, and incubated in 1xPBS-100mM Glycine 3×10 min. Sections were circled with a PAP pen (Dako), rinsed in dH20, incubated in primary block (IF buffer:1xPBS, 7.7mM NaN3, 0.1%BSA, 0.2% TritonX-100, 0.05% Tween20 containing) [41 (link)] and 10% goat serum for 1 hour, then incubated in combination of mouse, rabbit, and chicken primary antibodies in IF buffer,10% goat serum for 1 hour. Slides were washed 3×10min in IF buffer, incubated in Alexa Fluor secondary antibody (1:500, ThermoFisher), IF buffer,10% goat serum, for 45 min. Slides were mounted with Prolong Diamond Antifade Mountant with Dapi (ThermoFisher). Primary antibodies included Troma1-Keratin 8 (1:200; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, cat#TROMA-I-c), Keratin 14 (1:400; Covance, cat#906001), Keratin 5 (1:400, Covance, cat#PRB-160P-100) and IGF1R (1:200; Ventana, cat#7904346). 488, 546, and 647 goat secondary Alexa Fluor antibodies were used against mouse, rat, rabbit, and chicken.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!