The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using taq plus master mix

1

ChIP-qPCR for Sp1 in NSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) for the primary NSCs was performed using a Pierce Magnetic ChIP Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An anti-Sp1 antibody suitable for ChIP (1:100 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology; United States; Cat# 9389; AB_11220235) or rabbit IgG (1:250 dilution; Thermo Fisher Scientific; United States; Cat# 31887; AB_2532177) was use. qRT-PCR was performed to obtain quantitative data using 2 × Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme, China), and TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa, China). The enrichment at the cdkn1b promoter region was normalized to the amount of the total input. The Primers for the cdkn1b promoters can be found in the (Supplementary Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptional Analysis of Tmprss12 in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the sample by using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, 15596-026) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. mRNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using HiScript II Q Select RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, R232-01). PCR (polymerase chain reaction) was performed using 2 × Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme, P212-01), with primers specific for mouse Tmprss12. The PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis using mouse Actin as an internal control. Quantitative real-time PCR of cDNA was carried out using AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme, Q141-02) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with an ABI Q5 real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The primer sequences used for these experiments are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Herbicide Resistance Assay in Transgenic Soybean and Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T0 transgenic soybean plants were tested by phosphinothricin following the manufacturer’s instructions. In the early flowering period of soybean, herbicide (Liberty®, Bayer, Monheim am Rhein, Germany) was applied at the same position as the third compound leaf of the transgenic soybean at a concentration of 135 mg L-1, and the soybean leaf condition was observed three days after application. Similarly, T0 transgenic A. thaliana plants were sprayed with herbicide (Liberty®, Bayer, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) for identification. In addition, for molecular identification, total DNA was extracted from the leaves of the T3 and T4 transgenic lines by 2 × Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The PCR was performed with 10 μM final concentrations of primers and the following program: 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 2 min; and 72 °C for 5 min for the final extension [76 (link)]. The specific identification primers (Additional file S2: Table S2) used in PCR amplification were designed according to the vector and the GsABCI1 sense fragment sequence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

cDNA Amplification and Cloning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 2 ng of the pre-amplified cDNA of each cell was further amplified using 2 × Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme, Cat. P212), and then cloned into T vector (Transgen, Cat. CT111-01). Next, the ligated plasmid transferred into Trans5α chemically competent cell (Transgen, Cat. CD201-01) by heat shock. The M13 primer were used to identify positive clones inserted with cDNA fragments. Single clones of bacteria were collected for Sanger sequencing to identify the barcode sequence of each cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Generating Transgenic Arabidopsis Thaliana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana lines, the exonic region of GmGSTU23 was amplified using gene-specific primers with XbaI and SacI sites (Table S2). GmGSTU23 was then linearly cloned into the pTF101.1 binary vector with a modified CaMV 35S promoter, which contained a phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (bar) resistance gene (phosphinothricin N-acetyltransferase, PAT) as selection marker for the transgenic line. The constructed vector was transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 by electroporation (Gene Pulser Xcell™ Electroporation Systems, Hercules,CA, USA), and the target gene was transferred into the A. thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) by flower dipping [89 (link)]. The T0 generation of A. thaliana was identified by overexpression by herbicide (Liberty®, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) spraying and PCR molecular identification. Molecular identification of the T3 transgenic line was performed using the 2 × Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The specific primers used for PCR were designed based on the vector and the gene sequence (Table S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bacterial DNA Extraction and Cloning Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using a TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). Small-scale plasmid DNA preparations were generated using a E.Z.N.A™ Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). The DNA fragments were amplified in a C1000™ Thermal Cycler using the 2×Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme, Jiangsu Sheng, China) or I-5TM 2 ×High Fidelity Master Mix (MCLAB, South San Francisco, CA, USA). Purification of DNA fragments from the PCR reaction and the restriction digests were performed using the DNA Fragment Purification Kit Ver.4.0 (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). In-fusion segments were recombined to linearized pK18mobsacB (EcoRI/BamHI) using a ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Jiangsu Sheng, China). Restriction enzymes were purchased from TaKaRa. Point mutations were performed according to manual of Fast mutagenesis system Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA extraction and sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic DNA of each knockout cell line was extracted with a GeneJET Genomic DNA purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Primers were designed at 200 nt upstream and downstream of the cutting site on CDC20 exons. 200 ng of genomic DNA was used as a template for the amplification of the interested region by 2× Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme). Amplified genomic DNA was further cloned into a pTA2 vector according to the manufacturer’s instructions (TArget Clone, Toyobo). Six clones were picked and sequenced for each cell line.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Heterologous Expression of TDTS Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 8 TDTS genes were synthesized by GenScript Biotech (Shanghai, China). The other 15 TDTS genes were amplified from the gDNA of corresponding wild strains with primers shown in Tables S3 and S4. PCR reactions were performed with the Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB biotech, Ipswich, MA, USA). pUARA4 was digested utilizing KpnI (NEB biotech). The ClonExpress®II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) was used to construct expression plasmids by inserting the PCR product of different TDTS genes into the KpnI restriction sites of pUARA4 through homologous recombination to produce heterologous expression plasmids, pUARA4-TDTS. The single clones were manually picked out and utilized as the template for PCR using 2 × Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme) with the primers listed in Table S4. Positive clones were sequenced by Tsingke Biotech to confirm the gene was inserted into the right restriction site with no mutations. Plasmid DNA was extracted using the Plasmid Mini Kit I (OMEGA, Norcross, GA, USA). The active TDTS sequences were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information under accession number PP516626-35. The 13 inactive TDTS sequences deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information under accession number PP776614-26
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Molecular Identification of Diaporthe citri

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The obtained D. citri-like isolates were confirmed based on their colony morphology, microscopic conidia features, and molecular characteristics [2 (link)]. Specifically, we used D. citri-specific primer pair Dc-F/Dc-R (5′-CCCTCGAGGCATCATTAC-3′/5′-ATGTTGCAGATGGTCAAATGG-3′) designed based on sequence variations in the Tub gene among 21 Diaporthe species from citrus [2 (link)]. Each PCR reaction was conducted in a final volume of 20 µL, containing 1 µL of template genomic DNA (~20 ng), 0.8 µL forward primer, 0.8 µL reverse primer, 10 µL of 2 × Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme Biotechnology Co. Hangzhou), and 7.4 µL sterile water. PCR cycling condition was performed as follows: 94 °C for 3 min, 31 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension of 3 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis at 120 V for 30 min in a 1% (w/v) agarose gel and visualized under UV light after ethidium bromide staining. Genomic DNAs from two strains (ZJUD2 and ZJUD14), which were identified as D. citri [2 (link)], were used as positive controls. The genomic DNAs of Diaporthe citriasiana strain ZJUD31 and D. citrichinensis strain ZJUD40 [2 (link)] were used as negative controls. These four reference isolates are stored at the Institute of Biotechnology at Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative RNA Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using RNAiso Plus Reagent (Takara, 9109) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was synthesized using the M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Vazyme, CHN). PCR reactions were conducted using the 2 × Taq Plus Master Mix (Vazyme, CHN) and set at an initial 95 °C for 3 min and then 22 (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)) and 30 (TRIM39) cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ChemiDoc MP System (Bio-Rad, USA). GAPDH was used as an internal control. The primers used in the study are shown in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!