The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using quil a

1

Isolation and Purification of Quil-A from Q. brasiliensis Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Q. brasiliensis leaves were collected from adult plants growing near Canguçu, RS, Brazil (31°23′42″S-52°40′32″W). A voucher specimen is deposited at the UFRGS Herbarium (ICN 142953). Air-dried powdered leaves were extracted in distilled water (1∶10, w/v) for 8 h, filtered, partitioned with ethyl acetate and lyophilized to obtain the AE. The AE was then submitted to further purification through reverse-phase chromatography to obtain fraction QB-90, as described in detail in previous work [9] (link). Quil-A was purchased from Brenntag Biosector (8047-15-2), Denmark.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Alpha Toxin Vaccine Evaluation in Calves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The recombinant carboxy-terminal domain of alpha toxin fused to glutathione-S-transferase (GST) was kindly provided by Prof. Titball, University of Exeter, UK. This Cpa247–370 was produced in E. coli and was therefore devoid of any other C. perfringens proteins [20 (link)]. Recombinant native alpha toxin (rCpa) and Cpa247–370 were formulated with the adjuvant QuilA (Brenntag Biosector, Frederikssund, Denmark) in PBS. Each animal was injected with 1.5 mL of the filter-sterilized (0.2 µm) formulation containing 350 µg antigen and 750 µg QuilA. Control animals received 750 µg QuilA in 1.5 mL PBS.
Six male Holstein–Friesian calves aged 2 months were used. They were housed on straw and received water and hay at libitum, and concentrates adjusted to the body weight.
For each antigen (rCpa, Cpa247–370 or QuilA control), two calves were immunized subcutaneously in the neck. The calves received a primer vaccination at the age of 2 months, and booster immunizations 14 and 28 days later.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Formulation and Characterization of Adjuvants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LMQ, LQ, LQuil, and SQuil adjuvants were manufactured at the Vaccine Formulation Institute (VFI, Switzerland). The composition of each adjuvant is shown in the Supplementary Table. Neutral liposomes, made of DOPC and cholesterol, were prepared by the lipid film method as previously described (Rivera-Hernandez et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, DOPC and cholesterol were dissolved in ethanol and the solvent was evaporated under a vacuum. The lipid film was then rehydrated with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS, pH 7.2) followed by extrusion to yield concentrated neutral liposomes. LMQ was obtained by extemporaneously mixing neutral liposomes with MPL from Salmonella Minnesota (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and QS21 (Desert King International, San Diego, CA, USA). LQ and LQuil were obtained by extemporaneously mixing neutral liposomes with QS21 or QuilA® (Brenntag, Denmark), respectively. Squalene-in-water emulsion was manufactured as previously described (Ventura et al., 2013 (link)), with the addition of cholesterol. SQuil was obtained by extemporaneously mixing squalene-in-water emulsion containing cholesterol with QuilA®. Prior to in vivo studies, compatibility between each adjuvant and LigAc was confirmed by monitoring the 24-h stability of formulations containing adjuvant and antigen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chitosan-based Vaccine Adjuvant Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chitosan HMC + 70/5 (MW 81 kDa, DD 88 %), HMC + 85/5 (MW 18 kDa, DD 94 %) and HMC + 90/10 (MW 28 kDa, DD 97 %) were supplied by Heppe Medical Chitosan (HMC) GmbH (Halle, Germany). OVA (grade VII, from chicken egg white), phosphate buffer solution (PBS) tablets and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC -isomer I) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Quil-A was acquired from Brenntag Biosector (Frederikssund, Denmark). Fasted state simulated intestinal fluids (FaSSIF) were obtained from Biorelevant.com (London, UK), while phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) was from Sigma-Aldrich (München, Germany). Ethanol 96 % (EtOH) was acquired from VWR International (Darmstadt, Germany), and acetic acid (AA) >99%, stomach porcine mucin, periodic acid and Schiff's reagent for aldehydes were supplied from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). RPMI 1640 was obtained from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA, USA), and VyBrant TM CFDA SE Cell Tracer Kit was from Thermo Fisher (Waltham, USA). Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis and Triton X-100 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Paraformaldehyde was obtained from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Hatfield, USA), whereas milliQ water (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) was freshly produced in all cases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunization and Challenge of Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments involving mice were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and policies of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and the principles set forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by the Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Montreal (RECH-1748). Housing and husbandry of animals were taken care by the personal of level II facilities at the University of Montreal. Six-week-old CD-1 mice (Charles River Laboratories, Saint-Constant, QC, Canada) were randomly assigned to five groups of 11 or 13 mice for immunization with rSsEno or rDPPIV, respectively, as accepted by the ethical committee. Animals were immunized twice subcutaneously at a 2-week interval with either 50 μg of rSsEno or rDPPIV mixed with one of the following adjuvants: 20 μg of Quil-A® (Brenntag Biosector, Frederikssund, Danemark), 15% of Polygen™ (MVP Laboratories, Omaha, NE, USA), 55% of Stimune® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or 50% of Montanide™ ISA 50 V2 (Seppic, Paris, France), following the manufacturers’ recommendations. A control group received 100 μL of PBS. To follow antibody responses, mice were bled (100 μL) before immunization, and twelve days after the first and the second vaccination doses by the dorsal tail vein. Fifteen days after the second vaccination, animals were intraperitoneally challenged as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

WNV E-protein Immunogenicity in Liposomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The WN-80E protein utilized in these studies was provided by Hawaii Biotech, and has been previously described.17 (link) Briefly, the protein is a carboxy-truncated WNV E-protein which is produced in Drosophila S2 cells, and purified using an antibody affinity-based purification method. Protein was provided in PBS, and stored at −80 °C until use.
SLA, a synthetic lipid adjuvant, is a derivative of GLA and has been previously described.49 (link) QS21 was obtained through in-house purification of Quil A (Brenntag Biosector), or purchased from Desert King (San Diego, CA). QS21 purity was assessed in each lot via a high-performance liquid chromatography-based method established at IDRI and qualified for cGMP release. Liposomes were generally manufactured by microfluidization until a liposome diameter of ~80 nm was achieved.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunization strategy for chicken protection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On days 3, 9 and 15, chickens were immunized with 30 μg of NetB W262A, CPA247–370 or a combination of both. In each case, Quil-A (50 μg; Brenntag Biosector, Frederikssund, Denmark) was used as an adjuvant. The mixture was diluted in PBS to a total volume of 200 µl, mixed by vortexing and filter-sterilised (0.2 µm pore size). Birds were vaccinated subcutaneously in the neck with a 200 µl dose. Controls consisted of an untreated group and a group receiving only the Quil-A adjuvant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tetravalent dengue vaccine evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunization regime was based on similar studies performed investigating candidate dengue vaccines in mouse models. Under ketamine hydrochloride (Ceva Animal Health, Glenorie, Australia) and xylazine hydrochloride (Troy Laboratories, Gendenning, Australia) sedation, SV129 mice were immunized with 1 or 0.1 μg tetravalent sE (DENV1: 258848, DENV2: PR159, DENV3: CH53489, DENV4: H241 produced from S2 cells, donated by Prof Mathew Cooper, UQ) formulation by nanopatch or 1–10 μg tetravalent sE by intradermal (ID), subcutaneous (SC), or intra muscular (IM) injection, with or without 3 μg of the saponin adjuvant Quil-A (Brenntag, Essen, Germany). Control groups received PBS delivered via each investigated injection method, while nanopatch control groups received excipients only. Nanopatches containing the dose to be delivered were applied to each ventral ear pinnae using a proprietary applicator at a velocity of 3.1 ms−1 and kept in place for 2 min. Mice received three doses by nanopatch or SC, ID, or IM injection at 28-day intervals, with blood samples collected one day before vaccination and 28 days after final dose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunization with AV-1959R Adjuvants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seven groups of C57BL/6 mice (n = 5–8) were immunized with 20 μg of AV-1959R (pET11/3Aβ1-11-MultiTEP) formulated with a selection of adjuvants: Montanide-ISA51 (s.c.; 50/50 ratio; SEPPIC, France), Montanide-ISA720 (s.c.; 50/50 ratio; SEPPIC, France), MPLA-SM (s.c.; 10 μg; Enzo, NY), Alhydrogel® (s.c.; 70 μg; BRENNTAG, Denmark), Quil-A (s.c.; 20 μg; BRENNTAG, Denmark), Advax™, and AdvaxCpG (both i.m.; 1mg; Vaxine Pty Ltd, Adelaide, Australia). All mice were injected four times at biweekly intervals. Sera were collected 14 days after the third immunization and were used to measure anti-Aβ antibody responses. On day 7 after the last injection mice were terminated and cellular immune responses were analyzed in splenocytes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mucosal Immune Response Induction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dimodan ® MO 90/D (monoolein) was kindly donated by Danisco (Grindsted, Denmark). Dextran (from Leuconostoc spp., 40 kDa), ovalbumin (Grade VII, from chicken egg white) and dibutyl sebacate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Quil-A was obtained from Brenntag Biosector (Frederikssund, Denmark), phosphate buffered saline (PBS) tablets were acquired from Oxoid limited (Basingstoke, England) and Eudragit ® L100-55 (EL100-55) was purchased from Evonik (Darmstadt, Germany). 5,6-Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and CellTrace TM Violet Cell Proliferation Kit (CTV) were purchased from Molecular Probes ® (Eugene, OR, USA). OVA257-264 peptide (SIINFEKL) was acquired from Mimotopes (Clayton, Australia). PeCy7 anti-CD8, propidium iodide and HRP Goat anti-mouse IgG were from BioLegend ® and APC-H7 anti-CD4, PE anti-Vα2, biotin anti-Vβ5 and APC streptavidin from BD Pharmingen TM . Complete mini protease inhibitor cocktail tablets were purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim Germany) and Mouse Anti-OVA IgA Antibody Assay Kits from Chondrex inc. (WA, USA). All other chemicals were of analytical grade and used as received. Milli-Q water (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) was used throughout the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!