The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using apc conjugated anti mouse f4 80

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometry for Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A single renal cell suspension was prepared and stimulated with PMA/Ionomycin/Golgi-plug for 4 h. The cells were incubated with different primary antibodies or the appropriate isotype control antibodies at 4°C for 30 min. The following antibodies were used PerCP/Cy5.5-conjugated anti-human CD14 (Biolegend), PerCP/Cy5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 (Biolegend), APC-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 (Biolegend), and PerCP/Cy5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD11b (Biolegend). After cellular surface staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm Soln Kit for intracellular staining with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-human C3 (Abcam) and PE-conjugated anti-mouse IL-17A (eBioscience). All flow cytometric analyses were performed using an LSR II Flow Cytometer (Beckman-Coulter) and Flowjo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Skin Immune Cell Profiling in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A dose of 1 μg of Lpl1(+sp) in 10 μl of PBS or PBS alone as internal control, were s.c. injected into the auricle of anesthetized C57BL/6 wild-type (n = 6), and TLR2−/− (n = 5) mice. On day 1 after injection, the ear tissues were collected, placed in RPMI medium (Fisher Scientific), and subjected to enzymatic digestion with 4 mg/ml Collagenase IV (Fisher Scientific) and 0.4 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich) in RPMI medium, followed by incubation for 1 h at 37 °C with shaking. A single-cell suspension was obtained after the tissue was homogenized and passed through a 40 µm cell strainer (Becton Dickinson). Skin tissue cells were then analyzed using the following antibodies: APC-R700-conjugated anti-mouse CD45 (BD Biosciences), V450-conjugated anti-mouse CD11b (BD Biosciences), APC-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend), PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-mouse Ly-6G (BD Biosciences), BV605-conjugated anti-mouse Ly-6C (BD Biosciences), PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD335 (BD Biosciences), and FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD3 (BD Biosciences). Cells were acquired on a BD FACSLyric flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed using FlowJo version 10.1 software (Tree Star, Ashland, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immune Profiling of Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice bearing subcutaneous and orthotopic tumors were euthanized 7 days after IRE, and tumors were harvested and dissociated using a mouse tumor dissociation kit according to manufacturer’s recommendations (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). For the analysis of tissue-derived lymphocytes, tumor tissues, LN, and spleens harvested from mice were chopped into small pieces and mashed through a 70 um strainer. The red blood cells were lysed by red cell lysis buffer (TIANGEN). Then, cells were washed with PBS containing 1% FBS and stained with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD206 (141705, Biolegend, San Diego, USA), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD16/32 (101307, Biolegend), APC-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 (123115, Biolegend), respectively, on ice for 15 min (3 × 106 cells/sample). The sample were washed three times and resuspended in 200 uL of cold PBS containing 2% FBS and 1 mM EDTA for analysis using flow cytometry (FC; CytoFLEX, Beckman Coulter, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Macrophage Characterization by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We resuspended the macrophages in auto MACS Rinsing Solution. Nonspecific Ab binding was blocked using an Fc blocking Ab, and the purity of isolated macrophages was determined by staining with APC-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend). The surface markers of macrophages were evaluated using PE/CY7-conjugated anti-mouse CD86 (Thermo). To stain CD206 intracellularly, macrophages were fixed and incubated with PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD206. Flow cytometry was performed using a FACSCalibur cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electroporation and Macrophage Polarization Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For in vitro electroporation detection, we utilized PI (Invitrogen) staining. PI (640905, BioLegend) was added to the cell suspension simultaneously or after electroporation at 10 μg/mL. After incubation for 15 minutes, the transfection efficiencies of the samples were measured. To determine apoptosis, after electroporation, the resuspended tumor cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC/PI (640905, BioLegend), and analyzed by FC. To analyze the polarization of macrophages, the macrophages were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-human HLA-DR (11–9956-42, eBioscience, San Diego, USA), PE-conjugated anti-human CD206 (12–2069-42, eBioscience), PE-conjugated anti-human CD163 (333606, Biolegend), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD16/32 (101307, Biolegend), and APC-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 (123115, Biolegend) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery of Mecp2 siRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bleomycin (BLM) was obtained from Huirui. Murine recombinant IL‐4 was purchased from PeproTech. The Lipofectamine 3000 transfection kit was acquired from Invitrogen. Cholesterol and DSPC were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich, Inc. Lipidoid (C12‐200) was acquired from Xinjiahecheng Medical Chemistry Corporation. mPEG2000‐DEG was purchased from NOF Corporation. siRNAs targeting Mecp2 and Scr siRNA were purchased from Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.
Antibodies against CD68, CD206, and TGF‐β1 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies against arginase‐1 and fibronectin were purchased from Abcam. Antibodies against Mecp2, IRF4, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and α‐SMA were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies against collagen I, Irf4, Gapdh, and β‐actin were purchased from Proteintech, and antibodies against Ym1 were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. APC‐conjugated anti‐mouse F4/80, PE‐conjugated anti‐mouse CD11c, and FITC‐conjugated anti‐mouse CD206 antibodies were purchased from BioLegend.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Analysis of Macrophage Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) and Ana-1 cells were cultured in six-well plates, treated with conditioned media from NIH3T3/p3.1, NIH3T3/Src or colorectal cancer cells as described previously. Cells were harvested and washed 3 times with PBS, then resuspended in 100 µl 0.5% PBS and stained using monoclonal antibodies: APC-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend), FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD206 (BioLegend) and PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD163 (eBioscience) for 30 min in an ice bath. Isotype control antibodies (BioLegend and eBioscience) were used as negative controls. Flow cytometric analysis was performed on LSRII (BD). Data was analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Macrophage Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of cell surface markers and intracellular molecules of macrophages was determined using flow cytometry. Cells were incubated with Fc Block (BioLegend; Cat: 101302; Clone name: 93; Dilution: 1:100) and washed using PBS with 2% fetal calf serum, and then cells were stained with PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD11b (BioLegend; Cat: 101207; Clone name: M1/70; Dilution: 1:100), PE-conjugated anti-TREM2 (R&D Systems, Cat: FAB17291P; Dilution: 1:100), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD11c (BioLegend; Cat: 117308; Clone name: N418; Dilution: 1:100), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD206 (BioLegend; Cat: 141706; Clone name: C068C2; Dilution: 1:100), APC-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend; Cat: 123116; Clone name: BM8; Dilution: 1:100), or isotype antibodies. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the intracellular staining of KLF9 ((Biorbyt; Cat: orb9122; Dilution: 1:100)) was performed with the transcription factor staining buffer set (eBioscience). Cells were next subjected to flow cytometry analysis with a BD FACSAria IIu flow cytometer (BD Bioscience). Data were analyzed with FlowJo Software version 7.6.4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry for Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleen and colonic tumor were isolated into single-cell suspensions. After
washing, the single cells were pre-incubated with the fluorescence-conjugated
primary antibody for 30 minutes at 4°C in the dark. Then, we performed flow
cytometry on a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA). The results
were analyzed by FlowJo software. The following antibodies were used:
FITC-conjugated anti-mouse/human CD11b (BioLegend, #101206, USA), APC-conjugated
anti-mouse Ly-6G/Ly-6C (Gr-1) (BioLegend, #108412, USA), APC-conjugated
anti-mouse CD3 (BioLegend, #100235, USA), FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD4
(BioLegend, #100405, USA), APC-conjugated anti-mouse F4/80 (BioLegend, #157306,
USA), FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD11c (BioLegend, #117305, USA), APC-conjugated
anti-mouse I-A/I-E (BioLegend, #107614, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Peritoneal and Adipose Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions from the peritoneal lavages and visceral adipose tissues were plated in RF10c media with the addition of GolgiPlug (containing Brefeldin A) and GolgiStop (containing Monensin) Protein Transport Inhibitors (BD) according to manufacturer’s protocols. Plates were incubated for 9 h at 37°C and 5% CO2.
After incubation, cells were washed with PBS and stained for flow analysis. Single cell suspensions were labeled with Fc block (purified anti–mouse CD16/32; BD) for 10 min, followed by labeling with antibodies for 20 min at 4C. Cells were washed twice with a staining buffer consisting of 5% FBS (Gemini Bio-products) in DPBS (Corning). For intracellular staining, the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD) was used per manufacturer’s protocols. After staining, cells were analyzed using a custom configured Fortessa cytometer, and by using FACSDiva software (BD). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software vX (Tree Star). Antibodies used to distinguish macrophages were: PB-conjugated anti–mouse CD45, BV711-conjugated anti–mouse CD11b, BV605- and PE-conjugated anti–mouse CD206, BV785-conjugated anti–mouse CD19, APC-conjugated anti–mouse F4/80, and PE-Cy7–conjugated anti–mouse TNF (BioLegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!