The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mrq 28

Manufactured by Cell Marque
Sourced in United States

The MRQ-28 is a laboratory equipment product offered by Cell Marque. It is designed for performing various analytical tasks within a laboratory setting. The core function of the MRQ-28 is to facilitate precise and efficient data collection and analysis, but its specific intended use is not provided.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using mrq 28

1

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of MMR and MSI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tumors were evaluated for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and microsatellite instability (MSI) via immunohistochemical approach in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved laboratory for clinical care. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using an automated immunostainer (Leica Bond-III; Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) and Bond Refine PolymerTM biotin-free 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) detection kit. Antibodies included MLH1 (mouse anti-human antibody clone ES05, Leica, Buffalo Grove, IL), MSH2 (mouse anti-human antibody clone G219–1129, Cell-Marque, Rocklin, CA), MSH6 (mouse anti-human clone 44, Cell-Marque, Rocklin, CA) and PMS2 (mouse anti-human antibody clone MRQ-28, Cell-Marque, Rocklin, CA). Bright signal intensity in greater than 1% of tumor cells was considered positive for protein expression[12 (link), 13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Microsatellite Instability Status

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MSI status was determined using MSI analysis and/or immunohistochemical staining for MLH1 (1:100, clone ES05, Novocastra; Leica Biosystems, Seoul, Korea), MSH2 (1:400, clone G219-1129, Novocastra; Leica Biosystems), PMS2 (1:100, clone MRQ-28; Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA), and MSH6 (1:200, clone 44; Cell Marque). MSI analysis was performed using the Bethesda panel or pentaplex panel. The Bethesda panel consisted of two mononucleotide repeat markers (BAT25 and BAT26) and three dinucleotide repeat markers (D2S123, D5S346, and D17S250), whereas the pentaplex panel contained five mononucleotide repeat markers (NR21, NR24, NR27, BAT25, and BAT26). Normal and tumor allele patterns were compared for each marker. Cases with ≥2, ≥1, and ≥0 positive markers were classified as MSI-H, MSI-low (MSI-L), and MSS, respectively. MMR immunostaining results were recorded as retained or loss of nuclear expression. Retained nuclear expression was considered normal/MMR-proficient, and loss of nuclear expression was abnormal/MMR deficiency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mismatch Repair Protein Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry was performed on the primary diffuse gastric tumor using the standard streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase procedure. Primary monoclonal antibodies against MLH1 (clone G168-728, 1:200, BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA 1:200), MSH2 (clone FE11, 1:100, Oncogene Research Products, Cambridge, MA, USA), MSH6 (clone 44, 1:200, BD Transduction, San Jose, CA, USA) and PMS2 (clone MRQ-28, 1:10, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA) were applied to formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded sections four microns thick. The sections were deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated through graded alcohols to distilled water before undergoing antigen retrieval by heat treatment in either citrate solution pH 6.0 (MLH1, PMS2, and MSH2) or EDTA solution pH 9.0 (MSH6). An automated detection using a Leica Bond Autostainer (Leica, Buffalo Groove, IL, USA) was employed. Normal expression was defined as nuclear staining within tumor cells, using infiltrating lymphocytes as positive internal control. Negative protein expression was defined as complete absence of nuclear staining within tumor cells in the face of concurrent positive labeling in internal non-neoplastic tissues.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemistry for MMR Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize the MMR system, IHC was performed using 4-μm-thick paraffin tissue sections. The manufacturers and incubation conditions for primary antibodies are summarized in Table 1. Sections were incubated for 15 minutes with antibodies against MLH1 protein (1:200, ES05, Leica, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), MSH2 protein (1:100, G219-1129, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA), MSH6 protein (1:50, 44, Cell Marque), and PMS2 (1:50, MRQ-28, Cell Marque).
Tumors were considered deficient in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 expression when there was a complete absence of detectable nuclear staining in neoplastic cells. Intact nuclear staining of the adjacent non-neoplastic epithelium, stromal cells, or lymphocytes served as an internal positive control (Appendix 1).
Whole sections were stained and reviewed for cases that showed a loss of expression on a microarray.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of MMR Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded 4 micron thick sections using mouse anti-MLH1 monoclonal antibody (1:100 dilution; clone ES05; Novocastra, Buffalo Grove, IL), mouse anti-PMS2 monoclonal antibody (1:50 dilution; clone MRQ-28; Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA), mouse anti-MSH2 monoclonal antibody (1:150 dilution, clone FE11; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), and mouse anti-MSH6 monoclonal antibody (1:50 dilution, clone PU29;Novocastra) using the Envision Plus Detection System (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). Cases were characterized as MMR-deficient if tumor cells showed loss of staining for any of the four proteins, with intact staining in adjacent tissue (i.e., an internal positive control was required).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!