The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using mhc class 2

1

Immunophenotyping of Dental Pulp Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescently labeled antibodies for cell surface markers included CD73, CD90, and CD105 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CD133 and CD34 (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA), IgG, CD31, CD45R, CD14, CD11b, CXCR4, and MHC class II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Flow cytometry was carried out according to a previously described method [36 (link)]. The DPSC aliquots were incubated at 4°C for more than 30 min in 2% FBS containing Hanks’ buffer, each in presence of one of the aforementioned antibodies. After antibody staining, cells were washed twice using 2% FBS containing Hanks’ buffer and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. Flowcytometric analysis was performed by using a FACS Calibur analyzer machine (BD Biosciences). Relevant isotype controls were also included for compensation setting. At least 20,000 events were acquired for each sample for analysis using CellQuest Pro software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Immunophenotyping of Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analysis for cell surface markers were performed by blocking expanded cells first with FCR Blocking Reagent (1:5; Miltenyi Biotec Inc) and followed by incubating for 20 min at 4 °C with the following antibodies: anti-CD34-PE, and anti-CD133/2 FITC (all from Miltenyi Biotec Inc), CXCR4, CD31, CD14, CD161, MHC Class-I, MHC Class-II, LFA-1, VCAM-1, CD45, CD69, CD18, CD36, CD3, CXCR2, CD71, CD45R and Isotype controls (IgG1 and IgG2a) were purchased from BD Biosciences, (USA). After incubation, cells were washed with MACS sorting buffer and analyzed using a FACS Calibur flowcytometer (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). Dead cells were excluded via propidium iodide staining. At least 20,000 events were acquired. Data analysis was performed with BD Cell Quest software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microglia Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult microglia were harvested using density gradient separation and were prepared as described before53 (link). In short, Cells were stained with primary antibodies directed against CD11b (cat. no. 17-0112-83)13 (link), CD45 (cat. no. 48-0451-82)13 (link), CD115 (cat. no. 12-1152-82)13 (link), F4/80 (cat. no. 12-4801-82)13 (link), CD31 (cat. no. 12-0311-81, eBioscience)13 (link), CD44 (cat. no. 553133)13 (link), CD62L (cat. no. 553150, BD Bioscience)13 (link), MHC class II (cat. no. 107630, Biolegend)13 (link) at 4 °C for 15 min. Cells were washed and analyzed using a BD LSRFortessa (Becton Dickinson) or were sorted with a MoFlo Astrios (Beckman Coulter) or BD FACSAria III (Becton Dickinson) and further processed. Viable cells were gated by forward and side scatter pattern. Data were acquired with FACSdiva software (Becton Dickinson). Post-acquisition analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Conjunctival Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare frozen sections of conjunctiva, eyes were enucleated with the lids intact, fixed in 4% formaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 48 h, followed by cryoprotection in 10%–30% sucrose for 72 h before embedding in OCT. Tissue sections 7 µm in thickness were cut using a microtome and placed on slides to be stored at – 20°C until ready to use. Conjunctival explants were fixed in 4% formaldehyde before staining. Tissue sections and explants were blocked by PBS that contained normal goat, hamster, or donkey serum, 0.3%–1% Triton X-100 at RT for 1 h, and incubated overnight at RT with primary specific antibodies for CD11c (Biolegend, Dedham, MA), MUC5AC (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), MHC class II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), or TSP-1 (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA). After a PBS rinse, fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) were applied for 1 h in RT. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI dye. Fluorescent staining in tissue sections was visualized using the FSX100 Olympus fluorescence microscope. Staining in conjunctival explants was visualized using a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope equipped with a 63× oil objective. Images (z-stacks) were captured using the Zeiss ZEN software. Microscopic images were analyzed using NIH ImageJ software (14 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Macrophage Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse IgG2a anti-Ft. LPS mAb used to generate mAb-iFt immune complexes was purchased from Fitzgerald (Cat# 10-F02, clone#M023621, Acton, MA). The following flow cytometry antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, California): F4/80 (PE), CD11b (FITC), CCR7 (PE-Cy5.5), MHC class II (APC), B7.1 and B7.2 (PercP), CD11c (APC)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Characterization of Activated Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described, microglia were isolated from the impacted right cortices of mice 24 h post-injury (Carson et al. 1998 (link); Schmid et al. 2009 ; Puntambekar et al. 2011 ). In brief, mice were killed by halothane inhalation, and the brains of the mice rapidly removed and mechanically dissociated. The cell suspension was separated on a discontinuous 1.03/1.088 percoll gradient and microglia/macrophages/infiltrating immune cells were collected from the interface as well as from the 1.03 Percoll fraction. Microglial activation was analyzed by flow cytometry using fluorescently conjugated antibodies (APC-conjugated CD45, FITC-conjugated FcR and phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated antibodies against Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells-1 (TREM1), TREM2, MHC class II, CD40 (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunophenotyping of Regulatory T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against CD4, CD11b, CD25, CD40, CD80, CD86, F4/80, Gr-1, and I-Ab (MHC class II) were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA, USA), and mAbs against B7-H1 and Foxp3 were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). Intracellular staining protocols for regulatory T cells were followed for Foxp3 staining. For carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) labeling, splenic T cells (107/ml) from BALB/c mice were incubated with 0.5 μM of CFSE (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) for 10 min at room temperature. Flow analyses were performed with a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Conjunctival Goblet Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured conjunctival goblet cells were stained with eFluor 780-conjugated Fixable Viability Dye (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). TGF-ß1 (R&D Systems), TGF-ß2 (R&D Systems), TSP-1 (Santa Cruz Biotech.), CD36 (eBioscience), and MHC class II (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) primary antibodies and AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies) were used to assess surface staining. Their respective isotype-matched antibodies served as negative controls. Intracellular TGF-ß1, TGF-ß2 and TSP-1 were stained with the same antibodies but using an intracellular staining kit (eBioscience) as per the manufacturer’s instruction. Fluorescence-labeled cells were analyzed using BD LSRII Flow Cytometer (BD Bioscience). Further analysis of the data was performed using FlowJo v9.4.10 software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Eye Macrophage Immunophenotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This method and the antibody panel used for immunophenotyping eye MACROPHAGES was previously established (O'Koren et al., 2016 (link)), including antibody titrations and fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls. Briefly, single cell suspensions of tissues were transferred into PBS for staining with Aqua Live/Dead viability dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 minutes and then washed with PBS. Cells were incubated in the blocking solution containing 5% normal mouse serum, 5% normal rat serum, and 1% Fc block (eBiosciences) for 10 min and subsequently stained with a combination of fluorophore-conjugated primary antibodies against mouse CD45, Ly6C, Ly6G, CD64, CD11b, CD11c (Biolegend), F4/80 (eBiosciences) and MHC class II (BD Biosciences), at room temperature for 20 minutes. After staining, cells were washed and fixed with 0.4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Data was acquired with BD Fortessa flow cytometer using BD FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences). Raw flow cytometry data was analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phenotyping Dendritic Cells on Ice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All steps were done on ice or in 4°C centrifuges to prevent the sudden upregulation of MHC class II caused by handling [25 (link)]. Plates containing DC cultures were cooled for 20 min. The cells were then gently harvested, spun, counted and distributed into 96 well plates at about ~106 per well. We added 10 μl “ultrablock” (a mixture of 1:1:1 mouse, rat and goat serum containing 10μg/ml of the monoclonal anti-FcR antibody 2.4G2) for 10 min before adding a master-mix of a combination of antibodies anti-mouse CD80, CD40, CD11c and MHC class II (BD Pharmingen). Each antibody was titrated for optimal signal-to-background before use. After 20 min, the cells were washed and resuspended in PBS containing the viability dye, 7AAD plus 1% FCS, for 5 min, then centrifuged and resuspended in FACS buffer for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!