The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vitek automated system

Manufactured by bioMérieux
Sourced in France, United States

The VITEK automated system is a lab equipment product developed by bioMérieux. It is designed for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microorganisms. The VITEK system automates the process of microbiological analysis, providing accurate and efficient results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using vitek automated system

1

Agar Diffusion Assay for Staphylococcus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The agar diffusion assay was performed according to a modified Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method. One loopful of each test organism was suspended in 3 mL 0.9% NaCl solution separately. All clinical isolates of methicillin resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated from human beings and belong to the microbiological laboratory collection of the microbiology laboratory of Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Saudi Arabia. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolated strains were performed by a VITEK automated system (BioMerieux, Marcy I’Etoile, France). Nutrient agar was inoculated with this suspension of the respective organism and poured into a sterile petri dish.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
When a homogeneous bacterial culture had been obtained, the microorganisms were identified, and their drug susceptibility was determined, using the VITEK automated system (bioMérieux, France). If necessary, drug susceptibility could be tested manually using concentration gradient strips (Liofilchem, Italy) and a MuellerHinton II medium (bioMérieux, France). The sensitivity level of the cultured strains to colistin was determined using the commercial ComASP Colistin test (Liofilchem, Italy). The results of the susceptibility tests were interpreted according to the current criteria of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (2021 , 2022) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phenotyping and Sequencing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initial phenotyping of the training and validation sets was described in detail in Gordon et al.3 (link) The training set was phenotyped using either the Vitek automated system (bioMerieux) or the Stokes method disc diffusion52 (link), whereas all validation samples were phenotyped using two methods: a BSAC disc test15 (link) and the Phoenix automated microbiology system (BD Biosciences). For trimethoprim only disc testing was performed.
We removed 6 samples from the training data set and 20 samples from the validation set that were contaminated (see section Contamination in S. aureus genome sequence data below for details). All samples where there was discordance between Phoenix and disc for any drug in Gordon et al.3 (link) were rerun on Phoenix (for all drugs) and previous results from Gordon et al.3 (link) were discarded.
Samples were sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform, with mean read length (after cutting reads at bases with quality score below 10) of 87 bp and mean depth of 87, as described in ref. 3 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Identifying and Characterizing K. pneumoniae ML2011

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

K. pneumoniae ML2011 was collected in July 2004, from intensive care unit of the Military Hospital of Tunis (Tunisia). Identification of strains was performed by using both the VITEK automated system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) and API 20 E system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Biochemical and serological confirmation of the identity of this strain was done at the Laboratory of Bacteriology, Military Hospital, Tunisia. E. coli DH5α and E. coli HB101 were used, respectively, for the transformation and conjugation experiments. E. coli BL21 and BL21 (DE3) (pLysS) were used for the resistance profile of the different strains and for the overexpression of SHV-104, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bacterial Identification from Blood Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One milliliter of blood from sham and CLP group was cultured in Petri dishes with sheep blood and incubated for 48 hours at 37 °C in an aerobic atmosphere. Bacterial colonies identification was conducted using VITEK® automated system (BioMerieux, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Automated Blood Culture Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood cultures were performed at the microbiology laboratory using standard techniques via the automated vac+/alert system (Organon Teknika, Toronto, ON). Bacterial identification was performed using the Vitek automated system (bioMérieux, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Detection of ESBL and Carbapenemase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens came from the routinely clinical activity. GNB were isolated on Columbia 5% sheep blood agar (COS-bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), lactose-containing Mac Conkey (bioMérieux, France), and chromogenic media for the detection of ESBL production (ESBL Brilliance agar-Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and carbapenem resistance (Brilliance CRE agar-Oxoid, UK). For bacterial identification, we used API 20E galleries (bioMérieux, France) or the Vitek automated system (bioMérieux, France). Sensitivity to antimicrobial agents was tested according to the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria, by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) with the Vitek system, which was supplemented when needed by the disk diffusion method [10 ].
The phenotypic confirmation of ESBL production was done using the synergy test between extended-spectrum cephalosporins and clavulanic acid and the double-disk synergy test with cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefepime with and without clavulanic acid [10 ,11 (link)]. Carbapenemase production was demonstrated either by the modified Hodge test or by combined disc methods (KPC, MBL, and OXA-48 Confirm kit, Rosco Diagnostica, Denmark) [10 ,12 (link),13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both aerobic and anaerobic cultures were performed for the blood and pus samples. Species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility were tested using VITEK automated systems (bioMérieux Vitek, USA), and interpreted according to guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria. Phenotypic confirmation of ESBL detection was performed using the double-disk diffusion method in our clinical microbiology laboratories, as recommended by the CLSI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Accurate Blood Culture Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aerobic and anaerobic cultures were performed for the blood samples. Species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility were tested using VITEK automated systems (bioMérieux Vitek, Hazelwood, MO, USA) and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria.
Blood culture results were classified as positive or negative based on the presence or absence of bacterial growth, respectively. The provisional oral report was provided to clinicians immediately after obtaining strain staining results (usually the next day). Blood culture positivity was defined as the detection of a microbiological pathogen within 6 days of incubation. The results of blood culture showing presence bacterial growth were considered negative if the microbiological pathogen could not be identified. Each positive blood culture result was assessed for contamination (false positivity) according to the established criteria [9 (link)]. Thereafter, all false-positive culture results were coded as negative.
Phenotypical confirmation of ESBL detection and susceptibility to ESBL-positive isolates were evaluated using the disk diffusion technique in our clinical microbiology laboratories, as recommended by the CLSI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Aerobic and Anaerobic Cultures for Pus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both aerobic and anaerobic cultures were performed on the pus samples. Species identi cation and antimicrobial susceptibility were tested using the VITEK automated systems (bioMérieuxVitek, USA), and interpreted according to guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) according to the CLSI criteria. Phenotypic con rmation of ESBL detection was performed using the double-disk diffusion method in our clinical microbiology laboratories, as recommended by the CLSI [15] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!