The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Suretag labeling kit

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The SureTag Labeling Kit is a laboratory tool designed for the labeling of biomolecules, such as proteins, antibodies, and nucleic acids. The kit provides a simple and efficient method for attaching a variety of labels, including fluorescent dyes, to the target molecules, enabling their detection and analysis in various applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using suretag labeling kit

1

PathoChip Screening for Cancer Diagnostics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PathoChip screening procedure has been previously described [10 ,11 ,[16] (link), [17] (link), [18] (link)]. DNA and RNA were simultaneously extracted from cancer patients and control FFPE tissue samples using the AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and absorbance was measured at 260/280 nm to assess quality. Patient sample RNA (100 ng) and DNA (50 ng) were used for whole genome and transcriptome amplification (WTA) using the TransPlex Complete Whole Transcriptome Amplification Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Human DNA and RNA were extracted from the human B cell line BJAB (obtained from ATCC) to serve as a reference for cross-hybridization of probes to the amplified patient genomes and to determine background normalization. Purified WTA product (PCR purification kit, Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) quality was determined using A260/280 measurements, and 1 μg was labeled with either Cy3 (amplified patient sample) or Cy5 (amplified human reference) (SureTag labeling kit, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). All labeled specimens were purified, and a Cy3-labeled and Cy5-labeled reference were hybridized together on each PathoChIP array in constant rotation at 65 °C for 40 h, as previously described [10 ,11 ]. Array slides were washed and then scanned for visualization using an Agilent SureScan G4900DA array scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Tumor Genomic Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from a fresh-frozen piece of the original tumor (23 mg wet weight) and from KCI-MENG1-LP (P6) and KCI-MENG1-HP (P86) cells using resin-based purification techniques. DNA samples were quantified by NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific). Array comparative genomic hybridizations (aCGH) were performed with Agilent SurePrint G3 ISCA CGH+SNP 180K microarrays (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a commercially-available, genetically-normal female DNA standard. DNA samples were labeled with the SureTag Labeling Kit (Agilent). Bioinformatics analysis was performed using Agilent CytoGenomics Edition 2.5.8.1 with the significance threshold set at 10; log2 ratio cutoffs ≥0.3 and ≤0.37 according to the laboratory validated reproducibility measures. Data were further processed by filtering against the Cancer Gene Census (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Research Limited, Hinxton, UK) [33 (link)] to identify genes with well-characterized roles in cancer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Canine Oligo Array CGH Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligo array CGH (oaCGH) was performed by co-hybridization of tumor (test) DNA and a common reference DNA sample, where the latter comprised an equimolar pool of genomic DNA samples from multiple healthy individuals of various breeds. DNA extracted from FFPE samples was slightly degraded, as expected, but this was shown to have no adverse effect on data quality. DNA was labeled using an Agilent SureTag Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) with all test samples labeled with Cyanine-3-dCTP and the common reference sample labeled with Cyanine-5-dCTP. Fluorochrome incorporation and final probe concentrations were determined using routine spectrophotometric parameters with readings taken from a Nanodrop1000. Fluorescently labeled test and reference samples were co-hybridized to Canine G3 180,000 feature CGH arrays (Agilent, AMADID 025522) for 40 h at 65 °C and 20 rpm, as described previously (Angstadt et al. 2011 (link); Thomas et al. 2014 ). Arrays were scanned at 3 μm using a high-resolution microarray scanner (Agilent, Model G2505C) and data extracted using Feature Extraction (v10.9) software. Scan data were assessed for quality by the ‘Quality Metrics’ report in
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Array-CGH Analysis of Genomic Copy Number

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from SUM44 and LCCTam cells, the latter cultured in the absence of 4HT for 14 days, using the illustra triplePrep kit (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA copy number analysis was performed using an oligonucleotide array-CGH platform (SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray 8×60K; Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA), as published previously (Torresan, et al. 2014 (link)). DNA isolated from peripheral blood from multiple normal individuals was used as reference DNA. Briefly, equal amounts of cell line and reference DNA were directly labeled with Cy3 and Cy5, respectively, using the SureTag Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies) and hybridized in the presence of human Cot1-DNA (Life Technologies) to the array for 40 hours. The array was scanned using an Agilent array scanner and data was extracted using Feature Extraction (FE) software v10.10. For data analysis we used two different global analysis methods: Aberration Detection Module-2 (ADM-2, Agilent Technologies) and Circular Binary Segmentation (CBS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Array-CGH Analysis of CRC Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA isolated from each of the CRC cultures and their corresponding PBTs were simultaneously profiled for copy number using an oligonucleotide array-CGH platform (SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray 8x60K (Agilent Technologies, CA). DNA isolated from peripheral blood from multiple normal individuals was used as reference. Digestion, labeling and hybridization were performed according to our previous protocols [16 (link), 17 (link)]. Briefly, equal amounts of CRCs (and PBTs) and reference DNA, were enzymatically digested and directly labeled with SureTag Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies, CA). The labeled DNA was hybridized with human Cot1-DNA (Life Technologies, CA) to the arrays, at 65°C for 40 hours. The scanned data was analyzed using the Feature Extraction (FE) software v.10.10 following importing into Agilent Cytogenomics v.2.9.2.4 software (Agilent Technologies, CA). The algorithm ADM-2 and a threshold value of 6.0 were applied with the appropriated filters to analyze the data. Gene amplifications and deletions were considered when the corresponding plotted oligo-probes presented values of log2 ≥7/6 and log2≤5/6, respectively. Duplicate experiments were performed independently for both the CRCs and corresponding PBT to assess data reproducibility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!