The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

50 protocols using e test

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin (VAN) was carried out by both broth microdilution method32 ,33 and E-test for determining the high end MICs. Other antibiotics including cefpirome (CPR), clindamycin (CLI), trimethoprim (TMP), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), rifampicin (RIF), mupirocin (MUP), fusidic acid (FUS), teicoplanin (TEC) and linezolid (LZD) were tested by E-test (Liofilchem®, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mueller-Hinton agar plates were inoculated with 100 µl of a culture of each tested condition (A118 or A118 + PF) after OD adjustment. Antimicrobial commercial disks (BBL, Cockeysville, MD, USA) containing 10 µg of ampicillin (AMP), 30 µg of cefepime (FEP), 30 µg of ceftazidime (CAZ), 10 µg of imipenem (IMP), 10 µg of meropenem (MEM), 5 µg of ciprofloxacin (CIP), 10 µg of norfloxacin, 10 µg of gentamicin (GM), 30 µg of amikacin (AMK), 30 µg of tetracycline (TET), 15 µg of tigecycline (TIG), and 1.25/23.75 µg of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), were used and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. The assays were performed in triplicate. In addition, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was performed by E-test (Liofilchem, Italy) following CLSI recommendations82 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Pneumococci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolates primarily identified as pneumococci with M phenotype were subsequently tested for resistance against tetracycline (30 µg), oxacillin (1 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), cotrimoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), and chloramphenicol (30 µg) (Mast Diagnostics Ltd) by employing the disc diffusion agar method.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of erythromycin were determined by the Etest (Liofilchem, Via Scozia, Italy) method on Mueller-Hinton agar with 5% defibrinated sheep blood according to the manufacturer's instructions. All plates were incubated at 37℃ for 20 hr. The MICs for penicillin for all isolates with the M phenotype were also determined by the Etest method. MIC results were interpreted according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute [13 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterococcus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial agents of the tested E. faecium strain UKI-MB07 and two reference strains E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and E. faecium ATCC 700221 was further tested by determining MIC-values employing the broth microdilution technique according to ISO 20776-1 (2006) as well as Etest (Liofilchem s.r.l., Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) according to the EUCAST international guidelines (The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [EUCAST], 2014 ). The in vitro susceptibility results of the two reference strains were in the range of published data (European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [EUCAST] of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases [ESCMID], 2003 ; ISO 20776-1, 2006).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MALDI-TOF and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of the species, bacterial pure culture was subjected to MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight) mass spectrometry (MS) (Bruker Diagnostics, Germany) as a duplicate and processed by the routine diagnostic laboratory according to current microbiological diagnostic standards. Species identification was performed as duplicates and a score of >2.0 was considered reliable to the species level [30 (link)]. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the VITEK®2 (Biomérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) with the AST-N389 panel and interpreted based on the EUCAST clinical breakpoints (v10.0) for Pseudomonas spp. There are no breakpoints for bacteria of the genus Ralstonia. Since Ralstonia spp. were once assigned to the genus Pseudomonas [31 (link)], clinical breakpoints for Pseudomonas spp. would be the most suitable. MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) for imipenem and meropenem were confirmed by Etest (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi (TE), Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [9 ], an antibiogram assay was performed on the isolated K. pneumoniae colonies. The antibiotic discs contained ampicillin (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), cefixime (5 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), minocycline (30 µg), tigecycline (15 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), ampicillin/sulbactam (100/10 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), doripenem (10 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), colistin (10 µg), and fosfomycin (200 µg) (Mast Diagnostics, United Kingdom) [4 , 10 ].
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of imipenem, meropenem, and colistin for isolates resistant to carbapenems was determined by using E-test (Liofilchem, Italy) according to the 2021 CLSI guidelines [9 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Ochrobactrum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Ochrobactrum sp. POC9, MICs of 10 antimicrobial agents were assessed using Etest™ (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). The analysis was conducted according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations [48 ]. The following antibiotics (selected based on bioinformatic analyses that identified putative antibiotic resistance genes) were used: aminoglycosides–gentamicin (CN; concentration of antibiotic: 0.064–1024 µg mL−1), β-lactams (penicillin derivatives)–ampicillin (AMP; 0.016–256 µg∙mL−1), β-lactams (cephalosporins)–cefixime (CFM; 0.016–256 µg∙mL−1), β-lactams (cephalosporins)–cefotaxime (CTX; 0.016–256 µg∙mL−1), β-lactams (cephalosporins)–ceftriaxone (CRO; 0.016–256 µg mL−1), fluroquinolones–ciprofloxacin (CIP; 0.002–32 µg∙mL−1), fluroquinolones–moxifloxacin (MXF; 0.002–32 µg∙mL−1), phenicols–chloramphenicol (C; 0.016–256 µg∙mL−1), ryfamicins–rifampicin (RD; 0.016–256 µg∙mL−1), tetracyclines–tetracycline (TE; 0.016–256 µg∙mL−1). The susceptibility testing was performed at 37 °C for 20 h. After incubation, plates were photographed and MICs were defined. Antimicrobial susceptibility data were interpreted according to the EUCAST breakpoint table (version 8.0) [48 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using agar disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations (11 (link)). The antimicrobial disks tested were ceftazidime (CAZ: 30μg), ceftriaxone (CRO: 30μg), cefotaxime (CTX: 30μg), ceftizoxime (ZOX: 30μg), amoxicillin (A:10μg), cotrimoxazole (TS: 25μg), cefepime (CPM: 30μg), cefpodoxime (CPD:30μg), aztreoname (ATM: 30μg), gentamicin (GM: 10μg), amikacin (AN: 30μg), levofloxacin (LEV: 5μg), imipenem (IMP: 10μg), and meropenem (MEM; 10μg) disks (MAST, UK). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as controls (13 (link)). Also, MICs for ceftazidime and imipenem were determined using E-test (Liofilchem, Italy) method (11 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida krusei

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Etest (Liofilchem, Roseto, Italy) was used to determine the MICs of C. krusei strains in vitro on RPMI-1640 medium following the manufacturer’s instructions (24 (link)). Briefly, the surface of the agar plate was swabbed with the adjusted C. krusei inoculum suspensions (McFarland turbidity of 0.5 at 530 nm). A test strip consisting of a predefined concentration gradient of antifungal agent was placed on the medium surface. After 24 h of incubation, the Etest MICs (μg/mL) were determined directly from the intersection of the growth ellipse and inhibition zone with the tip of the strip. The results of the Etest were verified by M27-A3 microdilution, as proposed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), with 100 μL diluted suspension (1:50) and 100 μL serial dilutions of each antifungal agent added to each well of 96-well microplates subsequently incubated at 35°C for 24 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility and ESBL Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of all the isolates was tested by employing the Kirby-Bauer’s technique as suggested by the CLSI (10 ). The eleven antibiotic disks used include: imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), aztreonam (30 μg) (Mast Group Ltd, UK). Isolates with resistance against a minimum of three groups of antibacterial agents were considered as MDR (11 (link)). To detect ESBL phenotype combined disk method using disks of ceftazidime (30 mg) with (10 mg) and without clavulanic acid (Mast Group Ltd, UK) was applied to all positively screened isolates by modified hodgE test (MHT) (11 (link)). A growth in the area diameter of ≥5 mm around ceftazidime disc with and without clavulanic acid was expected to be a positive result for ESBL production (12 (link), 13 (link)). The MHT was performed for all isolates as recommended by CLSI (10 ). The E test (imipenem 0.002–32μg/mL) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) was applied (according to the manufacturer’s instructions) to all positively screened isolates by PCR test for blaNDM gene, to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!