The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

122 protocols using anti ha

1

Co-IP and Western Blot Analysis of Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For co-IP and western blot analysis, 10 μg total plasmids were co-transfected into HEK293 cells, which were collected 20 h after transfection and lysed in IP buffer (1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.4, 50 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). After centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, supernatants were collected and incubated with Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose (Santa Cruz) together with monoclonal anti-Myc, anti-Flag, or anti-HA (Abcam). After 8 h at 4 °C with soft agitation, beads were washed four times with the IP buffer above-mentioned and resuspended in 75 µl 2× SDS loading buffer. The immunoprecipitates and whole-cell lysates (WCLs) were analyzed by IB with the indicated antibodies (Abs). For western blot analysis, WCL were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore) and then blotted64 (link),65 (link).
The Abs used were as follows: anti-Myc (1:1000), anti-Flag (1:1000), anti-HA (1:1000), anti-Tubulin (1:1000), and anti-mCherry (1:1000) were from Abcam. Endogenous antibodies, anti-MyD88 (1:500), anti-IRAK4 (1:500), anti-TRAF6 (1:500), anti-TAK1 (1:500), anti-calpain2a (1:500) and anti-ubiquitin (1:500) were purchased from Boster Biological Technology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GFP Circularization Assay in HEK293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GFP circularization assays were performed in a manner similar to that previously described (Strijbis et al. 2012 (link)). In short, HEK293T cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-Gly-GFP-LPETG-Myc along with empty pUC19 (Control), pcDNA3.1-HA-S. pyogenese SrtA, or pcDNA3.1-HA-R15-78 using Lipofectamine2000 according to manufacturer instructions. 24 hrs later the cells were lysed in 1X SDS-PAGE loading dye, boiled for 10 min, and run on a 12% polyacrylamide gel. The gel was then transferred onto nitrocellulose paper and probed with anti-GFP-HRP (Stefanovic and Hegde 2007 (link)) or an anti-HA (Abcam 18181) followed by anti-mouse or anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). The blots were then incubated with SuperSignal West Pico (Pierce, Rockford Il) chemiluminescent substrate according to manufacturer instructions and exposed on Crystalgen blue sensitive film.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Solarbio, Beijing, China vT8200) for 10 min. Samples were then blocked with blocking buffer (PBS containing 10% fetal bovine serum) at 37°C for 2 h or 4°C overnight. Samples were incubated with diluted primary antibodies in blocking buffer at 37°C for 2 h or 4°C overnight. After the primary antibody incubation, samples were washed three times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (Solarbio, Beijing, China, T8220) followed by the incubation with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer for 2 h at 37°C. Then samples were washed three times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Beyotime, Beijing, China, C1002). Images were obtained using a confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan, FV1200). Primary antibodies included anti-CVH (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom, ab13840, 1:100), anti-CKIT (Invitrogen, CA, United States, 14-1172-81, 1:100), anti-C1EIP (polyclonal antibody, 1:10), and anti-HA (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom, ab187915, 1:100). Secondary antibodies included goat anti-Rat IgG (Proteintech, Chicago, United States, SA00003-11, 1:1000, [FITC] labeled) and goat anti-mouse IgG (Proteintech, Chicago, United States, SA00003-12, 1:1000, [TRITC] labeled).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein extract from equal numbers of cells was prepared using the TCA extraction method. An equal amount of proteins was resolved in an 8% SDS–PAGE gel and transferred to an Immobilon-FL (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) membrane using a wet electrotransfer system (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany). The membranes were incubated with an anti-HA (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) antibody followed by anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor 680 (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) and scanned on the Odyssey Clx imager (Li-Cor, Bad Homburg, Germany). The Western blots were quantified using AIDA software (Raytek, Berlin, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purification and Analysis of SCF Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SCF components such as human influenza hemagglutinin (HA)-Skp1, Cul1, Myc-Rbx1, and FLAG-Fbxo7 or FLAG-Fbxo7(ΔF-box) were transfected in HEK293T cells by using polyethylenimine. After 48 h of transfection, the cells were harvested and resuspended in lysis buffer (LB) (25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 225 mM KCl and 1% NP-40) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and phosphatase inhibitors (10 mM NaF and 1 mM Na3VO4). The lysates were incubated with agarose anti-FLAG M2 beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 6 h at 4°C with rocking. Beads were washed with LB and the SCF complexes eluted with FLAG elution buffer (300 µg/ml of peptide FLAG in 10 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 225 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% NP-40) for 1 h at 4°C with rocking. The eluates were stored in 15% glycerol at −20°C until use. To evaluate the purification of SCF complexes, immunoblotting was performed and probed using anti-Fbxo7 (ABN1038, Merck Millipore, Watford, UK), anti-HA (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Gsk3β (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, CA, USA), anti-Tomm20 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), or anti-myc (Cell Signaling Technologies, MA, USA). The concentration of the complexes was determined against known concentrations of BSA by Coomassie blue staining of the gel. The densitometry of the bands was determined by ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

USP39-SRPK1/SRSF1 Interaction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells with stable overexpression or knockdown of USP39 were collected by RIPA buffer. Immunoprecipitation was conducted with anti-HA (Abcam) or anti-SRPK1 (Santa Cruz) or anti-Pan-phospho-SR (Santa Cruz). By incubation with protein A agarose (Santa Cruz), the antibodies were removed. Proteins were prepared and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. The interaction between USP39 and SRPK1/SRSF1 was analyzed by Western blot using anti-Flag tag (Abcam) or anti-SRSF1 (Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Subcellular Fractionation and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used were: anti-HA (Abcam, 1∶2000), anti-human SIRT3 (Epitomics, 1∶500), anti-human SIRT4 (Antibodies-Online, 1∶500), anti-human SIRT5 (Abcam, 1∶5000), anti-cytochrome-C (Pierce, 1∶500) anti-very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (1∶1000; gift of Dr. Jerry Vockley), and respiratory chain antibody cocktail (1∶1000; Mitosciences, Eugene, OR). Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer and the homogenates were cleared by centrifugation and analyzed for protein concentration in triplicate using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad Hercules, CA). Lysates were electrophoresed and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using the Bio-Rad Criterion apparatus. For western blotting of cell fractions, cell pellets were gently dispersed in 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4. The cell suspensions were lysed mechanically by 20 passes through a cell homogenizer (Isobiotech, Heidelberg, Germany) using 10 µM clearance. Unbroken cells and nuclei were removed and discarded by centrifugation at 1,000×g for 10 minutes. Mitochondria were collected by centrifuging the supernatant at 12,000×g for 15 minutes. The supernatant was taken as the cytosolic fraction and the pellet as the mitochondrial fraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Expressing CRISPR Components in HEK293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three plasmids—pRGEN-CMV-CjCas9, pCMV-cjABE8e, and pCMV-cjCBEmax—were transfected into HEK293T cells, and whole-cell lysates (WCLs) were prepared using 1 × RIPA lysis buffer 72 h after transfection and quantified by Bradford assay. Western blot assays were conducted using the iWestern system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 10 μg of WCLs were separated in 4–12% bis-tris gradient gels and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using the iBlot 2 Dry Blotting System. Immunoblotting was conducted with anti-HA (#9110; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (anti-GAPDH, sc-47724; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) antibodies. The immunoblotted proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of SMAD Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed using protein extraction buffer at 48 h after transfection, and protein concentration was quantitated by BCA protein assay. Lysates (30 µg) were resolved by SDS/PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Pall corporation, Port Washington, NY, USA). The following antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA): SMAD2 (catalogue no. 5339); phospho‐SMAD2 (catalogue no. 3108); SMAD3 (catalogue no. 9523); p21 (catalogue no. 2947); Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Delaware, CA, USA): SMURF2 (catalogue no. sc‐25511); Na+/K+ ATPase α (catalogue no. sc‐48345), (AbFrontier, Seoul, Korea): anti‐β‐actin (catalogue no. LFPA0207), (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA): anti‐HA (catalogue no. H6908); anti‐Flag (catalogue no. F1804), (Abcam, Cambridge, UK): anti‐TβRI (catalogue no. ab31013); phospho‐SMAD3 (catalogue no. ab52903). Western Blotting Luminol Reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) was used to detect protein according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The membranes were visualized with an ATTO image analyzer (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Protein Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IF and IHC were performed according to the conventional protocols. The primary antibodies used for IF were anti-YAP (Abcam, Hong Kong, China #ab52771) and anti-βTrCP (Abcam, #ab233638). The primary antibodies used for IHC were: anti-YAP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, #sc-101199) and anti-ISG15 (Abcam, #ab233071). For IB, the proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE gels according to the conventional protocols. The primary antibodies used were anti-ISG15 (Abcam, #ab233071), anti-YAP (Abcam, #ab52771 and Santa Cruz, #sc-101199), anti-GAPDH (CST, #5174 and #51332), anti-Ub (Abcam, #ab7780 and #ab7254), anti-PSMB5 (Abcam, #ab167341), anti-βTrCP (Abcam, #ab71753 and #ab233638), anti-YAPO241 (developed by Biolynx, Hangzhou, China), anti-YAPP127 (Abcam, #ab76252), anti-YAPP397 (CST, Boston, MA, USA, #13619), anti-HA (Abcam, #ab9110 and #ab18181), anti-TEAD4 (Abcam, #ab197589 and #ab58310), anti-6PGL (Abcam, #ab229872), anti-FLAG (CST, #8146 and #2368), anti-UbCH8 (Abcam, #ab177485), anti-HERC5 (Invitrogen, Carbsland, CA, USA, #703675), anti-ATG5 (Abcam, #ab221604), anti-LATS1 (Abcam, #ab243656), anti-CK1 (Abcam, #ab270997 and #ab115293), anti-SMAD2 (Abcam, #ab40855), anti-alpha fetoprotein (AFP, Abcam, #ab284388) and anti-albumin (Alb, Abcam, #ab207327). ELISA kits (Yingxin, Shanghai, China) were used to measure the concentration of YAP protein and Rib-5-P.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!