The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using anti cd206

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometric Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analyses were performed using the following antibodies: anti-CD4, anti-CD11b, anti-CD33, anti-CD83, anti-CD86, anti-CD206 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD14, anti-CD58, anti-CD80, anti-HLA-DR (ImmunoTools), anti-CD16 (Thermo Scientific), anti-CD25, anti-GARP (eBioscience) and anti-Rab-32 (Abnova).
For intracellular staining of Foxp3, cells were fixed and permeabilized using a Fix/Permeabilization kit (eBioscience) and stained with anti-Foxp3 mAb (BD Biosciences). Cytokine expression was analyzed in T cells re-stimulated with 50 ng/ml PMA plus 1 μg/ml Ionomycin for 5 h in the presence of Monensin (1.3 μM) 7 days after in vitro primary stimulation (day 0). Cells were then permeabilized as above and stained with anti-IL-2, anti-IFN-γ or anti-granzyme B mAb (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry was performed on an LSRII FACS and FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences), using FlowJo software (Tree star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tumor Tissue Dissociation and Macrophage Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, we collected the tumor tissues of the two groups and lysed them with a prewarmed dissociation buffer (1 mg/mL collagenase I and 20 µg/mL DNase I). After 30 min, the lysate was filtered through a 70-µm cell strainer after the termination of digestion with a DMEM high glucose medium (containing 5% FBS). Cells were then blocked with Fc Block CD16/CD32 (1:50 dilution for a concentration of 0.5 µg per well) and stained with the antibodies in a staining buffer (1% BSA): anti-F4/80, anti-CD86 and anti-CD206 (BD Biosciences, CA, USA, 1:5000). Finally, the Canto II flow cytometry system and FlowJo_V10 software were used for flow cytometry analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

IL-33 Binding Analysis and Tumor Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDMs, THP-1, and RAW264.7 were harvested, washed, and re-suspended in staining buffer (2% FBS, 0.1% sodium azide in PBS) and then stained with anti-ST2L, anti-CD11b, and anti-CD206 antibodies (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
To assess IL-33 binding to the ST2L receptor, RAW264.7 cells were mixed with His-tagged rIL-33 (Leadgene Biomedical) (100 ng/mL) and α-IL-33 (Leadgene Biomedical) or α-ST2L (Leadgene Biomedical) (1 or 5 μg/mL) for 1 h, followed by incubation with a FITC-labeled His Tag antibody and flow cytometry analysis.
Tumor tissues were digested with 0.1 mg/mL collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and 1 mg/mL dispase II (Sigma-Aldrich) in serum-free DMEM for 30 min at 37 °C and meshed with complete medium. Cells were stained with anti-mouse CD11b, CD206, ST2L, and CD86 (BD Bioscience) in addition to CD4, CD25, and Foxp3. The data were recorded by CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter). The detailed antibody conditions are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunophenotyping of Macrophage Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After being washed with PBS, the cells were fixed with fixation buffer and incubated with permeabilization buffer (BD Bioscience) and stained with the following antibodies: anti-HMGB1 and anti-TNF-α antibodies. For cell surface receptor experiments, fixed MH-S cells were directly incubated with the following antibodies: anti-CD206, anti-CD86, anti-CD121a, anti-CD126, and anti-CD54 antibodies (BD Life Sciences) for 30 min at 37°C. Flow Cytometry was performed on a FACS Calibur (BD Life Sciences, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Differentiating M1 and M2 Macrophages from PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human CD14-positive peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (Lonza, Köln, Germany) were cultured in AIM-V medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) in the presence of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor for Type 1 (M1) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor for Type 2 (M2) macrophages (CellVivo Human M1 and M2 Macrophage Differentiation Kit, R&D, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 6 d. Then, the cells were stimulated with 1 μg/mL lipopolysaccharide for 24 h to generate activated M1 and M2 cells. The culture supernatants were collected, and levels of sPD-L1 were measured by ELISA as described above. The expression levels of specific markers for each type of macrophage were evaluated by flow-cytometry using a BD FACS Calibur, and the data were analyzed using BD CellQuest Pro software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Antibodies used for detection were PE mouse anti-CD80 (clone: L307.4, BD Biosciences) and anti-CD229 (interferon-gamma receptor) (clone: GIR-208, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for M1, PE mouse anti-CD163 (clone: 215934, R&D) and anti-CD206 (clone: 19.2, BD Biosciences) for M2, and PE mouse anti-PD-L1 antibody (clone: MIH1, BD Biosciences) for PD-L1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phenotypic Analysis of Peritoneal Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly isolated peritoneal cells or purified peritoneal macrophages and J774A.1 cells treated as described above, were harvested by scraping and stained with anti-F4/80 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), anti-CD11b (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Feldkirchen, Germany), anti-MARCO (R&D Systems, Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt, Germany), anti-CD38 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-CD206 (BD Biosciences), or respective isotype controls for 20 min at 4°C. Flow cytometry was conducted on a FACSVerse instrument (BD Biosciences) and analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Immune Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell suspensions were prepared in PBS containing 2% FBS. Cells (1 × 106) were blocked with mouse Fc blocking solution (anti-mouse CD16/CD32 mAb 2.4G2, BD Bioscience) and stained for 30 minutes at 4 °C with the appropriate antibodies. The antibodies used included: human and mouse anti-Foxp3 (1:50, 150D/E4) and anti-Gata3 (1:50, TWAJ) (eBioscience; San Diego, CA, USA); mouse anti-CD3 (1:50, 145-2C11), anti-CD4 (1:50, GK1.5) (BD Bioscience; F4/80), anti-BM8 (eBioscience), and anti-CD206 (1:50, C068C2) (BioLegend); and human anti-CD3 (1:50, SK7), anti-CD206 (1:50, 19.2) (BD Bioscience), anti-CD4 (1:50, OKT4), and anti-CD11b (1:50, ICRF4) (eBioscience). For intracellular staining, a Foxp3/Transcription factor staining buffer set was purchased from eBioscience. Data were acquired using a FACSVerse flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) and analysed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phenotypic Characterization of Human Monocytes and Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly isolated human monocytes and in vitro generated macrophages were labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-CD14, phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD64, anti-CD80, anti-CD206 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, United States) and FITC-conjugated anti-CX3CR1 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, United States). Monocytes were incubated with antibodies for 30 min at room temperature (RT), then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at RT, and kept overnight in 4°C prior to analysis. Macrophages were harvested using Macrophage Detachment Solution DXF (PromoCell GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany), stained with antibodies for 30 min at RT and analyzed immediately. Appropriate isotype controls were used as negative controls. Samples were acquired with the BD FACSCantoTM II system (BD Biosciences). Prior to analysis, monocytes and macrophages were gated based on size forward scatter (FSC) and granularity side scatter (SSC) in order to eliminate other cell types, dead cells, or debris. Analysis was performed using the FlowJo v10.0.7 software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, United States). Monocytes were CD14+ CD64+ CX3CR1+ CD206- CD80-, whereas macrophages were heterogeneous, with about 50% expressing CD14 and CD64, whereas in general they were positive for CX3CR1 and CD206, and negative for CD80.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tumor-Associated Macrophage Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tumor sections were first stained with TAMs associated biomarkers, including anti-CD86 and anti-CD206, before observation by fluorescence microscope. For quantitative analysis, the tumor suspensions were prepared by homogenization and stained with anti-F4/80, anti-CD86, and anti-CD206 (BD), followed by flow cytometry (Agilent) analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detecting CD206+ Macrophages in THP-1 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect CD206 + macrophages, PMA-treated THP-1 cells were first harvested and fixed overnight in 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4 °C. They were then resuspended in flow cytometry buffer (1 × PBS buffer containing 1% FSA) and stained with anti-CD206 (BD Biosciences, USA) for 30 min at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!