The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rups 100

Manufactured by Cook Medical
Sourced in United States

The RUPS-100 is a laboratory equipment product designed for medical and scientific applications. It provides a core function of delivering a controlled and consistent suction power for various laboratory processes. The RUPS-100 is intended to assist with tasks that require precise suction capabilities, but a detailed description of its intended use is not available.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using rups 100

1

Measurement of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HVPG procedures were performed using the techniques described previously 7 (link),16 (link). The RUPS-100 (COOK, Bloomington, Indiana, USA) was placed in the inferior vena cava through the right internal jugular vein using the Seldinger technique. A 7-F balloon-tipped catheter (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, USA) was guided into the middle or the right hepatic vein. Both wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) were obtained and repeated three times, and the mean value was calculated. A small amount of radiologic contrast medium was injected manually to check the adequacy of occlusion. The difference between the mean WHVP and the mean FHVP was defined as HVPG. Heart rate and arterial pressures were monitored throughout the examination. The procedures for HVPG measurement were performed by chief physicians with over three-year experience.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement was implemented by experienced interventional radiologists. Briefly, catheterization of the hepatic vein was performed through the right internal jugular vein with a transjugular liver access set (RUPS‐100; Cook Inc.). Then a TIPS needle was used to puncture the portal vein under fluoroscopic guidance. Afterwards, a 6‐ to 8‐mm balloon was used to dilate the tract, and a bare metal stent (Bard E‐LUMINEXX Vascular Stent, Karlsruhe, Germany) combined with an 8‐mm expanded polytetrafluoroethylene‐covered stent (Fluency; Bard Inc., USA) was deployed. Measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPG) was performed before and after shunt establishment.13, 14 Balloon tamponade was used when massive bleeding occurred. TIPS revision with angioplasty or another stent placement was performed if shunt dysfunction was confirmed by angiography.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

TIPS Placement for Refractory Ascites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all patients, discontinuation of PA is the cornerstone of treatment. In the ST group, anticoagulation was started once the contraindications were ruled out. Paracentesis and albumin infusion were conducted if necessary.
The indication for TIPS placement was ascites that required repeated paracenteses with or without variceal bleeding. TIPS placement was performed as follows: a RUPS-100 (COOK Medical) was used to access the branch of portal vein from the hepatic vein under fluoroscopic guidance. A balloon catheter was introduced to dilate the intrahepatic channel. Then, an 8 mm TIPS stent (Viatorr, Gore) or an 8 mm uncovered (E-lumine, Bard) combined with a covered stent (Viabahn, Gore; or Fluency, Bard), was placed in the channel (Fig. 1E and F). The portal pressure gradient (PPG) was determined before and after shunt creation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Local disinfection and anesthesia were performed at the selected piercing site, and then jugular vein puncture was conducted. A liver access set (RUPS-100; Cook, USA) was delivered into the hepatic vein or hepatic inferior vena cava, the left and right trunk of the portal vein or portal vein bifurcation were punctured, and the liver access set was then placed in the portal vein. A pigtail catheter was used for portography and measurement of portal venous pressure. The leading end of the ultra-smooth ultra-long hard guide wire was placed in the superior mesenteric vein or splenic vein. The sheath of the liver access set was withdrawn into the preshunt channel in the liver parenchyma, and biopsy forceps (Minimally Invasive Medical Technology Co., LTD, Nanjing, China) were inserted through the sheath to obtain liver tissue of the preshunt channel in the liver parenchyma (the size range of each obtained liver tissue sample ranged from 0.4×0.4 cm2 to 0.8×0.8 cm2, and recollection of tissue was required for samples of a smaller size) (Figure 1-A1). A balloon was introduced along the guide wire to dilate the shunt, and then a covered stent (Bard Fluency) with a diameter of 8 mm was implanted (Figures 1-A2 and 1-A3), followed by stent dilation (Figure 1-A4), measurement of portal venous pressure, and portography.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

TIPS Procedure: Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All TIPS procedures were performed according to previously described protocols.7 (link),8 (link) Briefly, hepatic vein catheterization was performed through the right internal jugular vein using a transjugular liver access set (RUPS-100; Cook Medical). When the portal vein was punctured by the TIPS needle, a hydrophilic guidewire (Terumo) was gradually advanced to the portal, splenic, or superior mesenteric vein. The Viatorr stent (Gore, Inc.) was in short supply in our center, and an 8-mm bare-metal stent (E-luminexx or Lifestent; Bard, Inc.) combined with an 8-mm expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent (Fluency; Bard, Inc.; or Viabahn; Gore, Inc.) was placed in the intrahepatic tract after dilation with a balloon catheter. The portal pressure gradient (PPG) was measured in every patient before and after TIPS creation, and the target of post-insertion TIPS PPG was less than 12 ​mmHg, or a decrease from the initial PPG >50%. Cyanoacrylate and/or coils were used to embolize the gastric varices when they were found on portal or splanchnic venography. Technical success was defined as successful creation of a shunt between the hepatic and intrahepatic branches of the portal vein.9 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the TIPS placement was selected, local disinfection was performed, followed by topical anesthesia with 1% lidocaine. Subsequently, different groups were subjected to various procedures. In group A, the metal guiding tube of the RUPS-100 (Cook Inc., Bloomington, IL) was bent >45°. In some cases, almost 90° manual bending was required. The stent was placed in the main portal vein. In group B, the metal guidance tube of the RUPS-100 was bent >45° (or almost 90° heavy manual bending in some cases), then turned 60° anticlockwise such that the puncture needle could reach the left branch of the portal vein from the left or the middle hepatic vein (Fig. 3). In group C, a straight puncture from the right or the middle hepatic vein to the right branch of the portal vein was common (Fig. 4); the metal cannula of the RUPS-100 was prebend to 45° and displayed sufficient torque control. The Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft (C.R. Bard Inc., Murray Hill, NJ), 8 mm in diameter and 60 to 120 mm in length, was implanted.
During the TIPS operation, a pigtail catheter was placed in the main portal vein to measure the portal vein pressure before and after shunting. If the stent expanded completely, the TIPS procedure was considered successful, and the technical success rate was recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TIPS creation was performed by experienced interventional radiologists. Catheterization of the hepatic vein was implemented through the right internal jugular vein with a transjugular liver access set (RUPS-100; Cook Inc.). Then a TIPS needle was used to puncture the portal vein under fluoroscopic guidance. After successful puncture of the portal vein with a TIPS needle, a hydrophilic guidewire (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) was sequentially introduced into the main portal vein, superior mesenteric vein or splenic vein. After the intrahepatic tract was dilated with a balloon catheter, an 8 mm ePTFE-covered stent (Fluency; Bard Corporation or Viabahn; Gore Corporation) was placed in the intrahepatic duct. Measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPG) was performed before and after shunt establishment. The target value of PPG was below 12 mmHg or, alternatively, a reduction of at least 20% from the baseline13 (link). For varicose vein embolization, coil and tissue glue were used to close the varicose veins. Balloon tamponade was used when massive bleeding occurred.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the procedures were completed by 2–3 experienced gastroenterology intervention doctors in this institution. The process of the TIPS procedure has been described in detail in previous articles (9 (link)). Briefly, the right or middle hepatic vein was catheterized using a transjugular venous approach with RUPS-100 (COOK; Indiana, United States) under local anesthesia. Indirect portal venography was performed through the superior mesenteric artery or the splenic artery. After showing the portal vein, the portal vein from the hepatic vein was punctured. After successful puncture, a 6–8-mm diameter covered stent (Fluency; Bard, New Jersey, United States or Viatorr; W.L. Gore & Associates, Arizona, United States) or a covered stent combined with a bare metal stent (Fluency; Bard with Luminexx; Bard), was deployed into the tract to support the parenchymal channel.,Then the stent was dilated with a balloon catheter. If evident stomach and esophageal varices presented, embolization was performed to fill the residual varices with coils or tissue-adhesive glue. Portal pressure gradient (PPG) was measured before and after the shunt procedure. All the operations were completed by the same intervention team. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured during operation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portal Shunt Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transjugular intrahepatic portal shunt is performed by the same team of experienced physicians. The right internal jugular vein was punctured with rosch-uchida transjugular liver access set (RUPS)-100 (Cook Inc.; Bloomington, USA) puncture device, intubated to the hepatic vein through the vena cava, and the portal vein was punctured under fluoroscopy to establish the direct channel between the hepatic vein and the portal vein. Then, portasystemic shunt was established by balloon expansion (6-8 mm) and the stents were placed. All patients in this study were treated with membrane-covered stents to maintain long-term patency of stents.5 (link) Placing a bare stent (Bard E-LUMINEXX Vascular Stent, Karlsruhe, Germany) followed by placing a coated stent (Fluency; Bard Inc., USA or Viabahn; Gore, USA). Portal vein pressure gradient (PPG) was measured before and after the shunt was established.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As described previously [12 (link)], TIPS procedure was performed by the same team of experienced radiologists. Briefly, the right internal jugular vein was punctured with RUPS-100 (Cook Inc., Bloomington, USA) puncture device, intubated to the hepatic vein through the vena cava, and the portal vein was punctured under fluoroscopy to establish the direct channel between the hepatic vein and the portal vein. Then, portasystemic shunt was established by balloon expansion (6–8 mm) and stents were placed. A bare Stent (Bard E-LUMINEXX Vascular Stent, Karlsruhe, Germany) followed by a covered Stent (Fluency; Bard Inc., New Jersey, USA or Viabahn; GORE, Newark, USA) were used. During the procedure, portal vein pressure gradient was measured before and after the shunt was established.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!