The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using cd33 apc

1

CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unstimulated and TLR-Stimulated CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors were plated at 10,000 cells/well for liquid, stromal cell-free B lineage cultures, or 1000 cells per sample in Methocult H4434 Classic (Stemcell Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s directions, as previously described [4 (link),5 (link),18 (link),19 (link)]. For B lineage liquid culture, cells were grown in QBSF®60 (Quality Biological, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Atlanta Biologicals), 100U Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco), 10% hASC conditioned media (LaCell LLC), 10 ng/ml stem cell factor, 10 ng/ml granulocyte stimulating factor, 5 ng/ml FLT-3 ligand, and 5 ng/ml IL-7 (as above). Half of the media was replaced once a week. After 4 weeks, cells were harvested, counted and assessed by flow cytometry using CD34-PE, CD10-Pacific Blue, CD19-PE-Cy5 (BioLegend), CD33-APC (BD Biosciences), and goat anti-ARID3a with a FITC-conjugated anti-goat secondary. Methocult cultures were incubated for 14 days and colonies were analyzed visually for monocytic, granulocytic and erythrocytic lineage cell colonies and counted using a Nikon Eclipse TS100 inverted microscope. Methocult cultures were harvested with warm 1X PBS, washed twice with warm PBS and once with ice cold PBS and then assessed by flow cytometry for the following surface markers: CD34, CD33, CD14, CD16, and CD41 with intracellular ARID3a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phospho-specific Flow Cytometric Analysis of PBMC Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly thawed PBMCs were resuspended in serum-free, antibiotic-free RPMI 1640 media. Cells were distributed (0.5 x 106cells in 100 μL per tube) to Falcon polystyrene round-bottom tubes (12 x 75 mm; Corning Incorporated, Durham, NC) and treated with IL-6 or IFN-γ (100 ng/mL) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) for 15 min at 37°C before subjecting them to phospho-specific flow cytometric analysis as described previously [7 (link)]. Briefly, after stimulation, cells were fixed by incubating in 2% PFA (BD Cytofix Fixation Buffer; BD Biosciences) for 10 min at 37°C and pelleted. They were then permeabilized by resuspending with vigorous vortexing in 300 μL ice-cold methanol. Cells were washed in staining media. Fluorophore-specific MAbs were added and incubated for 30 min at RT. The following markers were analyzed: CD3-PE/Cy7, CD4-APC/Cy7, CD45RO-PerCP/Cy5.5, CD33-APC, STAT1 (pY701)-AF488, STAT3 (pY705)-AF488, (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA); and CD45-PE (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The cells were washed with staining media and pelleted. Finally, the samples were resuspended in 250 μL of staining media and analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Investigating Leukemia Cell-Derived EV Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the differentiation experiment, LSCs were cultured with Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM) medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% FBS, 100 ng/mL recombinant human stem cell factor (rhSCF), 100 ng/mL rhFlt3 and 100 ng/mL for recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) with 5% CO2 at 37° C for 24 h. After culture, LSCs were treated with 1 μg/mL AML cell-derived EVs for 7 days. Next, LSCs were collected and labeled with CD19-PE (555413, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), CD33-APC (561817, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), CD3-APC (561811, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and CD235a-FITC (559943, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) for 30 min. Cells were then detected using a FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed with the Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunophenotyping of Hematological Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of surface markers, cells were stained in PBS containing 2% BSA. The following fluorescent‐labeled antibodies (purchased from BD Biosciences) were used: CD13 PE (652820), CD33 APC (652807), MPO FITC (652821), and CD45 PerCP (652803). Flow cytometry data were collected using Canto‐I (BD Biosciences) cytometers and analyzed with FlowJo V10 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flow Cytometry Immunostaining Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface and intracellular immunostaining analyses were performed using an Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer. NK cells and T cells were stained with the dye-conjugated mouse mAbs to human CD56-PE-Cy5 (Beckman Coulter), CD3-PE (eBioscience), CCR7-FITC (R&D Systems), granzyme B-PE (Invitrogen), and CD16-FITC, CD8-PE-Cy5, CD45RA-FITC, CD45RO-PE, and CD57-FITC (BD Biosciences). MDSCs were stained for CD11b-FITC, CD14-PE, CD33-APC, CD34-PE-Cy5, CD11c-PE, HLA-DR-PE, DC-SIGN-FITC, CD80-FITC, CD86-FITC, and CD83-PE (BD Biosciences and eBioscience), as well as IDO-A488 (R&D Systems), NOS2-PE (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and COX1-FITC/COX2-PE (BD Biosciences). The corresponding mouse antibody isotype controls IgG1-FITC, IgG2b-FITC, IgG1-PE, IgG2a-PE, IgG1-PE-Cy5, IgG1-APC, and IgG1-A488 (BD Biosciences) were used, as appropriate. Before staining, the cells were treated for 20 min at 4°C in PBS buffer containing 2% human serum, 0.5% BSA, 0.1% NaN3, and 1 μg/ml of mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) to block non-specific binding. Cell permeabilization for intracellular staining was performed using the Foxp3 Fix/Perm Buffer Set (eBioscience), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were stained for 40 min at 4°C followed by washing with PBS buffer containing 0.5% BSA and 0.1% NaN3, then fixed and stored in 4% paraformaldehyde until analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating AML Therapy in NOD/SCID Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NOD/SCID mice were bred and housed at the UHN/Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH; Toronto, Ontario, Canada) animal facility, and all studies were performed in accordance with guidelines approved by the UHN/PMH Animal Care Committee. Eight- to 12-week-old female NOD/SCID mice (10 per cohort) were sublethally irradiated (275 cGy) and interperitoneally injected with anti-CD122 antibody the day before intrafemoral transplantation. Freshly thawed primary AML samples harvested from patients’ peripheral blood were transplanted at cell doses of 5e6/mouse. At day 21, post transplantation, AGS67E and an isotype control ADC were dosed by i.v. injection at 1.5 mg/kg, QW for a total of 4 doses. Mice were sacrificed 7 days after the last treatment to assess the efficacy of AGS67E determined by the human AML engraftment in the injected right femur and non-injected bone marrow (left femur and two tibias). AML outgrowth was evaluated by flow cytometry using the following antibodies: CD45-FITC (BD), CD33-APC (BD), CD34-PE-Cy5 (Beckman Coulter), CD3-ECD (Beckman Coulter), CD38-PE-Cy7 (BD), and AGS67C-Biotin. Secondary detection of biotinylated antibodies utilized streptavidin–PE. Samples were analyzed using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying AML Myeloid Blast and LSC Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs from AML patients were isolated and incubated with a cocktail of CD45-FITC (BD), CD33-APC (BD), CD34-PE-Cy5 (Beckman Coulter), CD3-ECD (Beck-man Coulter), CD38-PE-Cy7 (BD), and either AGS67C-Biotin or isotype-Biotin antibodies. Secondary detection for biotinylated antibodies was accomplished with Streptavidin-PE. An LSRII flow cytometer (BD) was used for acquisition. Within the CD45+ population, two distinct subpopulations were defined, CD33+/CD3/CD20 (myeloid blasts) and CD33+/CD3/CD34+/CD38 [leukemic stem cells (LSC)]. Analysis was done with FlowJo version 9.5.4. MFIR for each AML sample was calculated by dividing the AGS67C MFI by the isotype MFI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying CXCR4 Expression in AML and CD34+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CXCR4 expression was determined in AML and CD34+ cells treated with IMiDs. A total of 0.2 × 106 (for cell lines) or 1 × 106 (for primary cells) cells were incubated with 10 µM of IMiDs (the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 was used as a positive control). Seven days later (48 h–72 h for primary AML cells) treated cells were stained with anti-human CD45-APC.Cy7, CD33-APC, CD34-PECy7 and CD184-BV421 (BD Biosciences) and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD184 within the blast population (CD45+CD33+) was FACS-quantified using a FACS Canto II cytometer. The expression of the CXCR4 ligand SDF1 was analyzed in BM-MSC (0.5 x 106) 48 h after treatment with 10 µM IMiDs. BM-MSCs were trypsinized and stained with anti-human CXCL12/SDF-1 (R&D Systems) using the Cell Permeabilization Kit (FIX&PERM®).26
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown in EHT culture or harvested animal tissues were stained with the following antibody panels. Haemogenic endothelium panel: CD34 PE-Cy7 (8G12; BD), FLK1 AF647 (89106; BD), CD235a/glycophorin (GLY)-A FITC (11E4B-7-6; Coulter), and CD43 PE (1G10; BD). HSPC panel: CD38 PE-Cy5 (LS198-4-3; Clontech), CD34 PE-Cy7, and CD45 PE (HI30; BD). Lineage panel: CD235a/glycophorin (GLY)-A PE-Cy7 or FITC (11E4B-7-6; Coulter), CD33 APC (P67.6; BD), CD19 PE (HIB19; BD), IgM BV510 (G20-127; BD), CD4 PE-Cy5 (13B8.2; Coulter), CD3 PE-Cy7 (SK7; BD), CD8 V450 (RPA-T8; BD), TCRαβ BV510 (T10B9; BD), TCRγδ APC (B1; BD), CD45 PE-Cy5 (J33; Coulter), CD15 APC (HI98; BD), and CD31/PECAM PE (WM59; BD). All stains were performed with fewer than 1 × 106 cells per 100 μl staining buffer (PBS + 2% FBS) with 1:100 dilution of each antibody, for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. Compensation was performed by automated compensation with anti-mouse Igk negative beads (BD) and cord blood MNC stained with individual antibodies. All acquisitions were performed on a BD Fortessa cytometer. For detection of engraftment, human cord-blood-engrafted mouse marrow was used as a control to set gating; sorting was performed on a BD FACS Aria II cell sorter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unstimulated and TLR-Stimulated CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors were plated at 10,000 cells/well for liquid, stromal cell-free B lineage cultures, or 1000 cells per sample in Methocult H4434 Classic (Stemcell Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s directions, as previously described [4 (link),5 (link),18 (link),19 (link)]. For B lineage liquid culture, cells were grown in QBSF®60 (Quality Biological, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Atlanta Biologicals), 100U Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco), 10% hASC conditioned media (LaCell LLC), 10 ng/ml stem cell factor, 10 ng/ml granulocyte stimulating factor, 5 ng/ml FLT-3 ligand, and 5 ng/ml IL-7 (as above). Half of the media was replaced once a week. After 4 weeks, cells were harvested, counted and assessed by flow cytometry using CD34-PE, CD10-Pacific Blue, CD19-PE-Cy5 (BioLegend), CD33-APC (BD Biosciences), and goat anti-ARID3a with a FITC-conjugated anti-goat secondary. Methocult cultures were incubated for 14 days and colonies were analyzed visually for monocytic, granulocytic and erythrocytic lineage cell colonies and counted using a Nikon Eclipse TS100 inverted microscope. Methocult cultures were harvested with warm 1X PBS, washed twice with warm PBS and once with ice cold PBS and then assessed by flow cytometry for the following surface markers: CD34, CD33, CD14, CD16, and CD41 with intracellular ARID3a.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!