The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti fade gold

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Panama, United States

Anti-fade gold is a specialized reagent used in the preparation of samples for microscopy and imaging applications. Its primary function is to protect fluorescent dyes and proteins from photobleaching, which is the loss of fluorescence intensity over time due to exposure to light. This reagent helps maintain the integrity and visibility of fluorescent signals during microscopic observation and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using anti fade gold

1

Immunofluorescence Staining of Tight Junction Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RBMECs were seeded onto fibronectin-coated coverslips, were allowed to grow to confluence and were treated with vehicle, chenodeoxycholic acid or deoxycholic acid (100μM). After 24 hours, cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 5 minutes at room temperature, permeabilized by washing with PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 (PBST) and blocked using LiCor blocking buffer (Lincoln, NE). Cells were stained overnight with antibodies specific for ZO-1, ZO-2, claudin 5 and occludin (Invitrogen-Zymed, Irvine, CA), at 1:100. Fluorescent detection using Alexa 488 secondary antibody (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA) was performed and coverslips were mounted onto a microscope slide with antifade gold containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) as a counter stain (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Rabbit Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Done as described [4 (link)]. Goat anti rabbit alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular probes, USA) secondary antibody was used in IFA. Nucleus was stained with 4’ 6’- diamino-2-phenylindole (Antifade gold, Molecular probes). Images were acquired using a 60X objective in a confocal microscope (Olympus FV1000) and analyzed by Fluoview software. Details in supplementary methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiplex Immunofluorescence of Lymph Nodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin‐embedded lymph node tissue samples were sectioned at 3 μm, placed on adhesive slide glass (Matsunami, Kishiwada, Japan), deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated through ethanol to distilled water. Heat‐induced epitope retrieval was performed in a pH 9.0 target‐retrieval solution (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) at 96°C for 45 min. Endogenous peroxidase was removed with 0.3% H2O2. Specimens were blocked with 5% normal goat serum in TBST and incubated with a rabbit monoclonal anti‐human CA9 antibody (clone: D10C10; Cell Signaling Technology) and a mouse monoclonal anti‐human CD25 antibody (clone: 4C9; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 4°C overnight. Bound antibodies were probed with HRP‐conjugated anti‐mouse IgG and a Tyramide Signal Amplification Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and with Alexa 594 anti‐rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes). Specimens were stained with DAPI (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), mounted with Antifade Gold (Molecular Probes), and observed by confocal microscopy (LSM 510 META; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Viral Pseudogenome Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown on cover slips at approximately 50% confluency and infected with HPV16 pseudovirus. EdU staining was performed according to the manufacturer's directions. In brief, at the indicated times post infection, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, washed, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min, washed, and blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS for 30 min followed by a 30 min incubation with Click-iT® reaction cocktail containing AlexaFluor 555 for EdU-labeled pesudogenome detection. After extensive washing, cells were incubated for 30 min with primary antibodies at room temperature, washed again extensively, and subsequently incubated with AlexaFluor-tagged secondary antibodies for 30 min. After extensive washing with PBS, cells were mounted in ‘Gold Antifade’ containing DAPI (Life Technologies; #P3693). All IF images were captured by confocal microscopy with a 63x objective using a Leica TCS SP5 Spectral Confocal Microscope and processed with Adobe Photoshop software. Approximately 5-10×105 viral genome equivalents per cover slip were used. Number of viral pseudogenome in the nuclei was quantified in z-stacks spanning the whole nucleus, unless mentioned. Results are expressed as a number of EdU or an average percent of EdU-labeled viral pseudogenome in the nucleus of control cells ± SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies for HPV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monoclonal antibodies 33L1-7 and H16.56E, which recognize a linear highly conserved epitope (residues 303-313 of HPV16 L1) and a conformational HPV16 L1-specific epitope, respectively, were described previously. Rabbit polyclonal HPV18 antibody raised against HPV18 VLPs was generously provided by Neil D. Christensen, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA [54 (link),55 (link),56 (link)]. A rabbit polyclonal antibody against LN332 (ab14509) (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was used to detect ECM depositions. The β-actin antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (sc-47778) (Dallas, TX, USA). Alexa Fluor-labeled secondary antibodies and Gold Antifade were purchased from Life Technologies. Heparin was purchased from Iduron (Manchester, UK). Marimastat (444289), batimastat (196440) and GM6001 (364206) were obtained from EMD Biochemicals (Darmstadt, Germany). For real-time PCR, SYBR-green from BioRad (Hercules, CA, USA) (IQ™ supermix® #170-8880) was used. A Click-iT EdU imaging kit and Alexa Fluor-Labeled antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen. Peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-mouse antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA, USA). Synthesis of DSTP27, an N,N'-bisheteryl derivative of Dispirotripiperazine (DSTP) has been described before [57 (link),58 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Visualizing EdU-labeled Pseudovirus Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HFK cells were infected with EdU-labeled pseudovirions using ECM-to-cell transfer on glass slides. EdU staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s directions. In brief, at the indicated times post infection, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, washed, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min, washed, and blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS for 30 min followed by a 30 min incubation with Click-iT reaction cocktail containing AlexaFluor 555 for EdU-labeled pesudogenome detection. After extensive washing, cells were incubated for 30 min with anti-PML (BETHYL; A301-167A), and anti-laminin A/C (Sigma; SAB4200236) primary antibodies at room temperature, washed again extensively, and subsequently incubated with AlexaFluor488- and AlexaFluor647-tagged secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes; A11029, A21245) for 30 min. After extensive washing with PBS, cells were mounted in ‘Gold Antifade’ containing DAPI (Life Technologies; P3693).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metaphase Chromosome Counting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were arrested in metaphase by treatment with colcemid for 4 h. Cells were then subsequently fixed and repeatedly washed in ice-cold methanol: acetic acid (3∶1), applied onto slides and embedded in DAPI mount (Anti-fade Gold, Invitrogen). Chromosome numbers in metaphase nuclei were assessed using a fluorescence microscope. Statistical significance values were calculated in Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad) using Student's t-test with Welch's correction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNA Fiber Analysis for Replication Asymmetry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fiber analyses were carried out as described previously [33 (link)]. For measuring sister fork asymmetry, cells were labeled with CldU (33 μM) for 30 min followed by exposure to 2 mM HU for 2 h and chased with IdU (340 μM) for 40 min before harvesting in PBS. Cells were lysed (lysis buffer: 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS) and DNA fibers stretched onto glass slides and fixed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1, Merck). After rehydration in PBS, these were denatured with 2.5 M HCl for 1 h, washed with PBS and blocked with 2% BSA in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 30 min. The newly replicated CldU and IdU tracks were immunostained using anti-BrdU primary and appropriate secondary antibodies. Coverslips were mounted using Antifade Gold (Invitrogen). Images were acquired on a Leica DMI 6000 fluorescence microscope and analyzed using Fiji software [34 (link)]. Statistics were calculated in Graph Pad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cell and Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% PFA and washed with 1xPBS prior to staining. The cells were permeabilized using 0.2% Triton-X in 1xPBS (PBST) for 5 min. The cells were blocked using 10% FBS for 1 h. Primary antibodies were added and incubated at RT for 1-2 h. The cells were washed with 1xPBST. Secondary fluorescent antibodies were used at 1:500 dilution and incubated at RT for 45 min. The cells were washed with 1xPBS and mounted using anti-fade gold (Thermofisher Scientific).
Immunofluorescence analysis was performed on cryo-sections as described previously [39 (link)] from patient samples using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval by boiling for 20 min. The slides were cooled at RT for 30 min prior to permeabilization using 0.2% Triton-X 100 in 1xPBS. Following this, blocking was done in 10% FBS and primary antibodies were used at the requisite dilutions. The slides were then incubated overnight at 4 °C. After washes in 1xPBS, the secondary staining was done using secondary Alexa fluorophores and vectashield was used for mounting. Images were taken using the Zeiss 710 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Staining of Skin Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples of the skin were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 24 hours and then stored in 70% ethanol. The fixed samples were processed in a histomat (Leica Biosystems) and embedded in paraffin as part of routine procedures. The paraffin-embedded samples were cut into 3-μm sections.
For immunostaining, the sections were deparaffinized with xylene and ethanol. Antigen retrieval was performed using sodium citrate buffer in a water bath set at 58 °C. After overnight incubation, the slides were cooled in the fridge for 10–20 minutes. Subsequently, they were washed with Tris-buffered saline (TBS), and blocking buffer (1% BSA in 1 × TBS) was added for 60 minutes at room temperature.
After the removal of the blocking buffer, the first antibody was diluted in 100 μl of 1 × TBS with 1% BSA (at a dilution of 1:100) and incubated overnight at 4 °C with parafilm sealing the slides (Table 6 shows the antibodies used). After 2 washes with 1 × TBS, the second antibody was added at a concentration of 1:400 in 100 μl of blocking buffer and incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature.
The slides were then washed in 1 × TBS and sealed with cover slides with mounting medium (anti-fade gold, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images of the stained sections were captured using an Axiokop 40 CFL camera (Zeiss). In Adobe Photoshop CC, tonal correction was applied to enhance contrasts within the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!