The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Multiquant version 2

Manufactured by AB Sciex
Sourced in United States

MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1 is a software application developed by AB Sciex for the analysis and quantification of mass spectrometry data. The core function of this software is to provide a comprehensive platform for the processing and interpretation of analytical data obtained from various mass spectrometry techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using multiquant version 2

1

Vipadenant Metabolite Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data acquisition and LC-QTOF-MS operation was conducted using Analyst® TF Version 1.6 (Sciex). MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1 (Sciex) was used for the peak integration for vipadenant quantification. PeakView® Version 2.2 and MetabolitePilot™ Version 2.0.2 were used for the structural elucidation of vipadenant metabolites. The descriptive statistics for the qualification studies were calculated with Excel 2015 (Microsoft). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated in a non-compartmental analysis using WinNonlin® version 8.0.0 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of α-Amanitin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data acquisition and a LC-qTOF-MS operation were conducted using Analyst® TF Version 1.6 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA). α-Amanitin was quantified by MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) using peak integration. The PK parameters of α-amanitin were calculated by WinNonlin® version 8.1.0 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA) in a non-compartment analysis. For MetID analysis, PeakView® Version 2.2 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) and MetabolitePilot™ Version 2.0.2 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) were used for the structural elucidation of α-amanitin metabolites. Excel 2016 spreadsheet (Microsoft®) was also used to process the statistical analysis of results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC–MS/MS instrument used was a QTRAP6500 (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) quadrupole linear ion trap hybrid tandem mass spectrometer with an ESI probe attached to the ion source and connected to an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatograph (Nexera, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Measurements were performed in the negative ion mode. Analyst 1.6.2 (SCIEX) and MultiQuant version 2.1.1 (SCIEX) were used for analysis and peak area integration, respectively. JMP Pro version 17.1 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS/MS-based Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data acquisition and LC-MS/MS operation were conducted using Analyst® TF Version 1.6 (Sciex, Redwood City, CA, USA). MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1 (Sciex, Redwood City, CA, USA) was used for peak integration for MMAF quantification. The descriptive statistics for the qualification studies were calculated with Excel 2015 (Microsoft, Seoul, Korea). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated in a non-compartmental analysis using WinNonlin® version 8.0.0 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA). PeakView® Version 2.2 (Sciex, Redwood City, CA, USA) and MetabolitePilotTM Version 2.0.2 (Sciex, Redwood City, CA, USA) were used for the structural elucidation of metabolites. MedChem Designer (Simulations Plus, Inc, Lancaster, CA, USA) was used for in silico metabolite prediction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Omeprazole Pharmacokinetics and Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data acquisition and LC–QTOF-MS operation was conducted using Analyst® TF Version 1.6 (Sciex). MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1 (Sciex) was used for the peak integration of omeprazole for quantification. PeakView® Version 2.2 and MetabolitePilotTM Version 2.0.2 were used for the structural elucidation of omeprazole metabolites. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated in a non-compartmental analysis using WinNonlin® version 8.0.0 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analytical Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyst® TF Version 1.6 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) operated with Windows® (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) was used for the instrument control as well as the data acquisition. MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) was used for the peak integration. Excel 2015 (Microsoft) was used for all calculations including peak area ratios, standard curve regressions, sample concentration values, and descriptive statistics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasma and Brain Pharmacokinetics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The plasma and brain PK parameters (terminal half-life (T1/2), time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax), the area under the curve up to the last time point (AUClast)) were estimated from the mean concentrations at each time by non-compartmental analysis (NCA) using Phoenix WinNonlin® Version 8.0.0 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA). The T1/2 and AUClast were calculated using a linear trapezoidal linear interpolation method; Tmax were observed values. The brain to plasma AUC ratios of the compounds (Kpbrain) were calculated as follows:

The AUClast-brain and AUClast-plasma were each AUClast of the brain and plasma, respectively.
Data acquisition and LC-ESI-TOF-MS operation were conducted using Analyst® TF Version 1.6 (Sciex). MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1 (Sciex) was used for the peak integration of SAS for quantification. PeakView® Version 2.2 and MetabolitePilotTM Version 2.0.2 were used for the structural elucidation of SAS metabolites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analytical Workflow for Pharmacokinetic Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyst® TF Version 1.6 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) operated with Windows® (Microsoft) was used for instrument control and data acquisition. Peak integrations were operated by MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA). Calculations including peak area ratios, standard curve regressions, sample concentration values and descriptive statistics were calculated with MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1. Pharmacokinetic calculations were performed using WinNonLin® version 6.4 (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification and Structural Elucidation of Daporinad

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data acquisition and LC-qTOF-MS operation was conducted using Analyst® TF Version 1.6 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA). MultiQuant® Version 2.1.1 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) was used for the peak integration for Daporinad quantification. PeakView® Version 2.2 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) and MetabolitePilot™ Version 2.0.2 (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) were used for the structural elucidation of Daporinad metabolites. The descriptive statistics for the qualification studies were calculated with Excel 2015 (Microsoft). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated in a non-compartmental analysis using WinNonlin® version 8.0.0 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Targeted LC/MS/MS Metabolomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A robust targeted LC/MS/MS method has recently been developed and used in a number of studies in the Northwest Metabolomics Research Center (NW-MRC).11 (link),15 (link),53 (link),62 (link)–67 (link) In this study, the MS data from the same samples as those measured by NMR, collected in our previous study,15 (link) were used to demonstrate the performance of the NMR–MS combination. Briefly, the LC/MS/MS experiments were performed on an Agilent 1260 LC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) AB Sciex QTrap 5500 MS (AB Sciex, Toronto, ON) system. Table S2 shows the LC gradient conditions. We monitored 99 and 59 MRM transitions in negative and positive mode, respectively (158 transitions in total). The optimized MS conditions are listed in Table S3. The extracted MRM peaks were integrated using MultiQuant version 2.1 (AB Sciex). The LC/MS/MS data were also deposited into the DRCC (Study ST000284).61
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!