Sas software 9.1 version

Manufactured by SAS Institute

Sourced in United States

SAS software 9.1 version is a comprehensive data analysis and statistical software package. It provides a range of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. The software is designed to handle large and complex datasets, and offers a variety of statistical techniques, including regression analysis, ANOVA, and multivariate methods.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Close spelling variants of this product

SAS version 9.1 statistical software package (2 citations) SAS version 9.1 statistical software (4 citations) SAS software version 9.4 (3458 citations) SAS 9.1 version (3 citations) SAS version 9.4 (18810 citations) SAS software 9.4 (366 citations) SAS software version (83 citations) SAS 9.4 (20063 citations) SAS version (194 citations) SAS software (6040 citations)

3 protocols using sas software 9.1 version

Endo-Ease vs NS for Endoscopic Resection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

This study was designed with a level of significance of α=0.05 and a detection power of 1-β=0.8 to test the superiority of Endo-Ease compared with NS for lifting and maintaining the submucosa during ER. The calculated sample size was 78 patients for gastric neoplasms and 86 patients for colorectal neoplasms.
The data were analyzed with SAS software 9.1 version (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Clinical usefulness was assessed by using intention-to-treat analysis and as treated analysis, with the intention-to-treat analysis as the primary method. Continuous variables were compared with Student unpaired t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Kim E.R., Park Y.G., Min B.H., Lee J.H., Rhee P.L., Kim J.J., Park J.H., Park D.I, & Chang D.K. (2015). Usefulness of Ready-to-Use 0.4% Sodium Hyaluronate (Endo-Ease) in the Endoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Neoplasms. Clinical Endoscopy, 48(5), 392-398.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Longitudinal Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Patients were categorized into Group I (procedures between 2003 and 2006) and Group II (procedures between 2007 and 2012). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software 9.1 version.

Abraham G.P., Siddaiah A.T., Das K., Ramaswami K., George D.P, & Thampan O.S. (2015). Laparoscopic nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidneys in patients with end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis: 10-year single surgeon experience from an Indian center. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, 11(3), 187-192.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Sensory Evaluation of Food Product

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Sensory evaluation test was carried out with a group containing 10 educated panelists. All evaluations were done through Single Stimulus method and five scores hedonic tests. The prepared questionnaires with four questions were asked to everyone and for every question there were five options. The proposed questions were color acceptance, odor and flavor, appearance shape, and chewiness (texture crispiness). Every one marked as own self taste one of choice such as very good, good, fair, poor, and very poor. Finally, scoring was done for every choice separately (very good = 5, good = 4, fair = 3, poor = 2, and very poor = 1). In this research, multiple Duncan's test in 0.01 level was analyzed with SAS software 9.1 version (Lawless & Heymann, 2010).

Mahjoorian A., Mokhtarian M., Fayyaz N., Rahmati F., Sayyadi S, & Ariaii P. (2016). Modeling of drying kiwi slices and its sensory evaluation. Food Science & Nutrition, 5(3), 466-473.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!