The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Macs cell separation system

Manufactured by Miltenyi Biotec
Sourced in Germany, United States

The MACS cell separation system is a laboratory equipment designed for the magnetic separation of cells. It utilizes MACS microbeads, which are super-paramagnetic particles coated with antibodies, to selectively label target cells. The labeled cells can then be separated from the rest of the cell population using a MACS column and a magnetic field. This technology allows for the efficient isolation and purification of specific cell types from heterogeneous samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

64 protocols using macs cell separation system

1

Isolation and Characterization of EPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol for culture of EPCs was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan (reference number P1000002), and all subjects gave informed written consent before enrollment in this study. Peripheral blood (80 ml) was collected from healthy donors, and mononuclear cells were isolated by centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturer's instructions. CD34-positive progenitor cells were isolated from the mononuclear cell fraction using a CD34 MicroBead kit and MACS Cell Separation System (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). CD34-positive EPCs were maintained and characterized as described previously [43 (link)]. Briefly, human CD34-positive EPCs were cultured in MV2 complete medium consisting of MV2 basal medium and growth supplement (PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany), supplemented with 20% defined FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT). The cultures were seeded on 1% gelatin-coated plasticware and maintained at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating MEK Inhibitor Efficacy on Tumor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Selumetinib or trametnib (Sellekchem) were added to tumor cells in
96-well plates. Viability was measured using the CellTiter Glo luminescent
viability kit (Promega) after 72 hr using a Wallace plate reader (Molecular
Probe). To determine pERK after MEKis treatment, Kras mutant lung tumor cell
lines and splenocytes collected from HKP1 tumor bearing mice were treated
with selumetinib or trametinib for 2 hr at 37C. Selumetinib and trametinib
stock solutions were prepared in DMSO and diluted in media. Cells were
stimulated with 0.1 ug/ml PMA for 2 min at 37C, then immediately fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized using ice cold 95% methanol. pERK was
stained using anti-pERK (#9106, Cell signaling) and goat anti-mouse
Ig(H+L)–FITC (SouthernBiotech) by flow cytometry. Washout experiments
were done using CD5+ splenocytes from HKP1 tumor bearing mice. CD5+ cells
were collected using CD5 microbeads (Miltenyi MACS cell separation system),
then seeded in the presence of selumetinib or trametinib into flat bottom
96-well plates pre-coated with anti-CD3 (145–2C11, 1ug/ml) and
anti-CD28 (37N, 1ug/ml). After 24hrs, media (RIPA + 7.5% FBS + 0.1%
b-mercaptoethanol) was replaced with MEKis (continuous group) or DMSO
diluent (wash out group) and the media was changed every day with freshly
prepared MEKis. At 72hrs and 96 hr, cells were collected and analyzed by
flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Adoptive Transfer of Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After final immunization, CD8+ T cells were purified from single-cell splenocyte suspensions from either GAS- or GAS/MAGE-A3-immunized HLA-A2 transgenic mice, with positive selection using a MACS cell separation system (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, 1 × 107 purified CD8+ T cells (> 95% purity) were injected intravenously into nude mice 10 d after the mice were subcutaneously implanted with A549 cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cytotoxic T-cell Activity in Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes was determined by standard 51Cr release assays. In brief, Neuro2a cells (target) were incubated with 0.2 mCi Na[51]CrO4 for 45 min at 37°C. Cells were washed twice with complete medium and transferred to round-bottom 96-well plates at 5 × 103 cells/well. CD8+ T-cells (effector) were purified from the unvaccinated growing and vaccinated shrinking total tumor digest using the MACS cell separation system (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Due to low abundance of the infiltrating lymphocytes in the growing tumors, purified T-cells were pooled together from four unvaccinated growing tumors for the assay. Effector T-cells were added to target tumor cells at varying numbers in a final volume of 0.2 ml to give the effector:target ratios as indicated in the Figure legends. After 4 hours incubation at 37°C, 0.1 ml of supernatant was harvested, and released radiolabel was determined by scintillation counting. Maximal release from targets was determined by treatment of cells with 1% Triton X-100, spontaneous release was determined from cultures of labeled targets incubated with medium only, and the formula used for determination of specific lysis was: [(experimental release − spontaneous release)/(maximal release − spontaneous release)] × 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DC and CD4+ T Cell Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For DC isolation, MLNs and PPs obtained from BALB/c mice were digested in 10% FCS-RPMI containing 0.5 mg/mL collagenase (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) with 10 µg/mL DNase I
(Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), and a cell suspension was obtained by filtering the digestion. From the obtained whole cells, CD11c+ cells were magnetically purified
with a MACS cell separation system (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. CD11c+ purification with MACS was conducted twice to
achieve high purity, and CD11c+ cells were used as DCs. For CD4+ T cell isolation, splenocytes were obtained from DO11.10 mice. CD4+ cells were separated
from whole splenocytes with the MACS system. Cells were isolated from multiple mice and pooled to obtain the required number of cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Characterization of Eosinophils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eosinophils were purified from the peripheral blood of hNC16A and hFcεRI/hNC16A mice using the MACS cell separation system (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) (Li et al., 2009 (link)). Eosinophils were also isolated from peritoneal cavity of hNC16A and hFcεRI/hNC16A mice injected i,p. with 1ml of 4% thioglycollate broth for 5 days using Chemicon’s Eosinophil Isolation Kit (EMD Millipore, Temecula, CA). Purity of eosinophils by MACS system and Eosinophil Isolation Kit were >96% (median=94) and >89% (median=87), respectively. Expression of hFcεRI on the surface of purified eosinophils was confirmed by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Cyan ADP). Briefly, the cells were incubated with human IgE (BD Bioscience, cat# Ab65866), followed by staining with APC-conjugated anti-human IgE antibody (BioLegend, cat# 325508, clone MHE-18). The flow data was displayed by APC against APC-Cy7 (nothing labeled in this color, just for visualization purpose). Human eosinophil cell line HL60 (ATCC, HL-60 clone 15) was derived from a leukemia cell line and has been used as a cell culture for human eosinophil research (Fischkoff et al., 1984 (link)). HL60 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 media (Gibco), supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma), and eosinophilic differentiation was induced by treating HC15 cells with 0.5 μM butyric acid (Sigma) for 5 days (Fischkoff et al., 1984 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Progenitor Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow was isolated from mice 8 weeks post pIpC injection, and subjected to lineage depletion using the MACS cell separation system (Miltenyi Biotec). 10,000 lineage negative bone marrow cells were plated on Methocult M3434 (Stemcell Technologies), and analyzed at day 9-11. Colonies were disaggregated, and 200 cells were re-plated and scored for subsequent secondary and tertiary colony formation. Three mice were assayed per genotype, and experiments were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation of Dermal Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LCs that migrated from skin explants were isolated as previously described (Nagao et al., 2009 (link)). In short, mouse ears were divided into dorsal and ventral halves, cartilage was removed, and the ear halves were then floated on 40 ml of complete RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with Amphotericin B at 37 °C in 10-cm petri dishes. The cells that migrated into the culture medium were collected after 24 h and were stored at 4 °C. These cells were pooled with cells that were harvested after an additional 24 h of skin explant incubation in newly replaced culture medium. EpCAM CD11b+ dermal DCs were isolated from dermal cell suspensions using a MACS cell separation system (Miltenyi Biotec).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation of Human Placental Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human placental macrophages (PMs) and fetal membrane tissues were isolated from placental tissue samples from women who delivered healthy infants at full term by cesarean section (without labor). Deidentified tissue samples were provided by the Cooperative Human Tissue Network, which is funded by the National Cancer Institute. All tissues were collected in accordance with the guidelines of the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (approval 131607). Macrophage isolation occurred as previously described (89 (link)); briefly, placental villous tissue samples were minced followed by digestion with DNase, collagenase, and hyaluronidase (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Cells were filtered and centrifuged, and CD14+ cells were isolated using the magnetic MACS Cell Separation system with CD14 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Cells were incubated in RPMI 1640 medium (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) with 10% charcoal stripped fetal bovine serum (ThermoFisher) and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (ThermoFisher) overnight at 37°C in 5% carbon dioxide. The following day, PMs were suspended in RPMI 1640 medium without antibiotic/antimycotic and distributed into polystyrene plates. Cells were incubated for at least 1 h prior to infection to allow for cell adherence to the plate or to poly-L-lysine-coated glass coverslips (Corning, Bedford, MA) for microscopy assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation of CD34+ Progenitor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral
blood (80 mL) was collected from healthy volunteers with informed
consent before collection. The peripheral blood mononuclear cells
(PBMCs) were fractionated from other blood components by centrifugation
on Ficoll-Paque Plus (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) based
on the manufacturer’s instructions. Utilizing CD34 MicroBead
kit and MACS Cell Separation System (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach,
Germany), the CD34-positive progenitor cells were obtained from the
separated PBMCs. The isolation and maintenance of CD34-positive EPCs
were carried out as previously described.37 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!