The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mouse anti gapdh

Manufactured by Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Sourced in United States, Canada, United Kingdom

Mouse anti-GAPDH is a primary antibody that recognizes the GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) protein. GAPDH is a widely expressed enzyme involved in glycolysis. This antibody can be used to detect and quantify GAPDH expression in various samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

208 protocols using mouse anti gapdh

1

Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction was performed in accordance with the protocol of Chomczynski [26 ]. Briefly, protein precipitation from the organic phase was prepared by adding isopropanol. Precipitate was washed with ethanol and dissolved in 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution. Quantifications and determination of protein purity were performed with a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (ThermoScientific NanoDrop Technologies). Total protein (30 μg) was mixed with 4X Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and loaded on 4% to 15% Mini-PROTEAN TGX™ Precast Gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories) for electrophoresis. Transfer was done with polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) transfer membranes (TRANS-Blot® Turbo™ System, Bio-Rad Laboratories). The membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C followed by primary antibodies—rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse IL-1β (Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse IL-6 (Abcam), and rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C—and with secondary antibody: horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Bio-Rad Laboratories) for 1 hour. Immunoblotting bands were visualized by Immun-Star™ WesternC™ Chemiluminescence Kits, and a Gel Doc™ EZ System (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was used for imaging and protein-band assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were sonicated for 1 minute in the precooled RIPA lysate (Beyotime) and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C and the supernatant was stored at −80°C. The protein concentration in the sample was determined with BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime). Electrophoretic separation was performed for the extracted protein with 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and the protein was transferred to PVDF (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membrane was sealed in TBST buffer containing 5% skim milk for 1 hour and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: anti-mouse-p-tlr4 (Santa Cruz, 1 : 1000), anti-mouse TLR4 (CST, 1 : 1000), anti-mouse-p-nf-κ B (Santa Cruz, 1 : 1000), anti-mouse-NF-κ B (Santa Cruz, 1 : 1000), anti-mouse-casepse3 (abcam,1 : 1000), anti-mouse-Bax (abcam,1 : 1000), anti-mouse-Bcl-2 (abcam,1 : 1000), and anti-mouse-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, 1 : 1000). Then the membrane was washed with TBST and incubated with horse radish peroxidase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Beyotime, A0216, 1 : 5000) for 1 hour at room temperature. Enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to detect protein bands, and Image Lab software (Bio-Rad) was used to quantify protein bands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blotting of Cell and EV Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was carried out as previously described.15 (link) Cell or EV lysates were prepared in lysate RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), to which a cocktail of protease inhibitor was added (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO, USA). An equal amount of protein was loaded and run on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. The proteins were moved from the gel to a PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and probed, first, with the primary, and followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibody. The signals were detected using a chemiluminescence detection system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Primary antibodies used: anti-mouse-NIS (Thermo Fisher Scientific; dilution: 1:2,500), anti-rabbit-CD63 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; dilution: 1:2,000), anti-rabbit-GM130 (Abcam; dilution: 1:3,000), anti-mouse-GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA; dilution: 1:5,000) and anti-rabbit-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; dilution: 1:5,000). HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (Cell Signaling Technology; dilution: 1:5,000) and anti-mouse (Cell Signaling Technology; dilution: 1:5,000) secondary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Inhibition of c-Jun Phosphorylation in FLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured FLS (passage 4) were plated at 2 × 105 cells in six-well plates overnight in DMEM containing 10% FBS and synchronized for 24 h in DMEM/0.1% FBS. The cells were pretreated for 1 h with different concentrations of TRYP, TRYP-Ox, or DMSO (vehicle control) and then stimulated with 2 ng/ml IL-1β or medium for 15 min at 37°C. The cells were then washed once with ice-cold PBS and lysed with modified radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1.0 mM EDTA, 20 mM β-glycerophosphate, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, and Protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN)]. Protein concentration of the lysates was measured using a MicroBCA Assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and 40 μg lysate was subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. Anti–phospho-c-Jun (Ser63) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA), and anti-mouse GAPDH was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblotting Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed according to a previously published protocol.13 Briefly, cell lysates were prepared in RIPA (Radioimmunoprecipitation assay) buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM disodium EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β‐glycerophosphate, 1% Triton X‐100) plus 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride and Halt protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific). Protein concentration was measured by Bradford assay (Thermo Scientific). 20–30 μg of protein was run on precast 4–15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels (Bio‐Rad), transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (GE Water and Process Technologies), blocked in Tris‐buffered saline (pH 7.4) plus 0.1% Tween‐20 and 5% skim milk, and incubated overnight at 4°C with 1:1000 diluted antibodies against indicated proteins (Cell Signaling) plus anti‐mouse GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or Vinculin (Cell Signaling) as loading controls. Membranes were incubated with species‐appropriate horse radish peroxide‐conjugated secondary antibodies for 1–2 h. Proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence using Western Lightening Plus reagent (Perkin Elmer). Band quantification and normalization to total protein was by ImageJ software.18 Data are shown as means of three individual blots with comparisons only made between like blots from the same gels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Protein Expression in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction from cells was performed using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA method (P0010S; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Equal amount of protein lysates were electrophoresed by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to the polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The membranes were blocked by TBST (NaCl 500mM, Tris 20 mM, pH 7.5) containing 5% skim milk. Protein expression in tissue samples was probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-PSMC2 (sigma, F1804) and mouse anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA).Mouse anti-FLAG and anti-GAPDH antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) were used for analyzing protein expression in SW1990 cells exogenously transfected with a plasmid encoding flag-tagged PSMC2. Blots were visualized with Electro Chemical Luminescence system, and densitometric analysis was measured with image analysis system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA). Values for the PSMC2 bands were normalized relative to the GAPDH bands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Molecular Mechanisms of JAK2-FOXO3 Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse anti-β-actin, mouse anti-Flag, and mouse anti-HA antibody and the following chemicals and solvents (MG132, cycloheximide, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol, glycine, sodium chloride, Trizma base, and Tween20) were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). AZD1480 was from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA). Rabbit anti-IL4Rα, rabbit anti-IL13Rα1, mouse anti-PARP1, rabbit anti-FOXO3, mouse anti-Lamin B1, and mouse anti-GAPDH antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Rabbit anti-JAK2, rabbit anti-pJAK2, rabbit anti-Tyr, rabbit anti-cleaved PARP1, rabbit anti-cleaved Caspase3, rabbit anti-Bax, rabbit anti-Bim, rabbit anti-Bcl2, rabbit anti-p21, and rabbit anti-p27 antibodies were from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA). Goat anti-rabbit (111-035-003) and goat anti-mouse (115-035-003) horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG were obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA, USA). Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents were obtained from Genedepot (Barker, TX, USA). pECE empty/Flag-FOXO3 and pCMV3-C-HA empty/HA-JAK2 plasmid DNA were from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA) and Sino Biological (Wayne, PA, USA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Characterization of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a 15% SDS-PAGE gel to isolate proteins, and the proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane. The primary antibodies used in our study were mouse anti-GAPDH (1:5000; Santa Cruz, USA), rabbit anti-RPL35 (1:100; ABclonal, China), rabbit anti-DDX10 (1:300; Proteintech, USA), mouse anti-FLAG (1:2,000; Sigma, USA), rabbit anti-RPL18 (1:100; ABclonal, China), rabbit anti-HNRNPU (1:100; ABclonal, China), rabbit anti-NCL (1:100; ABclonal, China), rabbit anti-PRMT5 (1:100; ABclonal, China), rabbit anti-E2F1 (1:100; ABclonal, China), rabbit anti-E2F4 (1:100; ABclonal, China), rabbit anti-E2F8 (1:100; ABclonal, China), goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:2,000; CST, USA), and goat anti-mouse IgG (1:2,000; CST, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Analysis of AR and GAPDH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. The slides were then blocked by 10% horse serum with 0.2% Triton X-100, and co-incubated with primary antibodies (the rabbit anti-AR (Santa Cruz, sc-816), the mouse anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, sc-47724)) at 1:100 dilution followed by washing and incubation with secondary antibody and DAPI (Thermo Fisher) for visualization with Nikon Ti-S microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Expression Analysis in Neuroinflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein from spinal cord tissues and PC12 cells was extracted in an NP‐40 lysis buffer. An equal amount of protein was fractionated by 11.5% SDS‐PAGE, and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Membranes were blocked with 5% freshly prepared milk‐TBST for 90 min. at room temperature and then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (rabbit anti‐cleaved‐caspase 3 (1:1000), goat anti‐Iba‐1 (1:1000), rabbit anti‐TNF‐α (1:1000), mouse anti‐TLR4 (1:10,000), goat anti‐IL‐6 (1:300) or mouse anti‐GAPDH (1:1000) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; mouse anti‐NF‐κB (1:400), rabbit anti‐IκB (1:400), mouse anti‐p‐IκB (1:400) from Abcam). After being washed in TBST, membranes were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 hr at room temperature. Proteins were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (Bio‐Rad). Signal intensities were quantified by densitometry using Image Lab 3.0 software (Bio‐Rad). Data were normalized to total or loading controls 23, 24.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!