The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

33 protocols using rhd2000

1

Electrophysiological Recordings in TEBC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Within a given TEBC training day, multiple unit signals were continuously recorded across 3 stages (Pre-training sleep, TEBC, and Post-training sleep). As we recently reported30 (link), the signals were amplified, digitized at 20 kHz using a preamplifier (C3334, Intan technonlogies) connected to the Intan interface board (RHD2000, Intan Technologies), and stored for off-line analysis in a 16-bit resolution format. The differentiated EMG signals were amplified (X 1000) and band-pass filtered between 150 and 1000 Hz. Together with those markers of applied stimuli (including the CS, US and optogenetic light stimulation pulse), EMG signals were fed into the digital input ports of data acquisition system (RHD2000, Intan Technologies). Data were visualized using NeuroScope (http://neurosuite.sourceforge.net)31 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Neurophysiological Recordings in Rodent mPFC and CA1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LFPs were recorded with a wireless amplifier system (W4, Multichannel Systems) 2–21 days after surgery at a sampling rate of 2 kHz or with a wired recording system (RHD2000, Intan Technologies, sampling rate 10 kHz). Single-unit activity was recorded at 20–30 kHz using a 32-channel amplifier system (RHD2000, Intan Technologies). After the last recording session, the animals were deeply anaesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of urethane (2 g/kg). To identify recording locations, electrolytic lesions were made by briefly (~1 s) applying 10–20 V to each electrode. The animals were intracardially perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (~1 min) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (~10 min). The brains were sectioned (slice thickness 100–200 μm) and inspected with a light microscope. A subset of brains were stained with cresyl violet or 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Only recording areas located in the prelimbic or infralimbic cortex of the mPFC and in the stratum pyramidale or oriens of CA1 were accepted for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chronic Neuronal Monitoring with Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a previously-described minimally invasive carbon fiber electrode array 15 (link) in addition to commercially available arrays (TDT, Neuronexus) to chronically monitor both single units and LFPs. Extracellular voltages were amplified and digitized at either 25 or 30 Khz using the Intan acquisition system (RHA2000 and RHD2000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optogenetic Stimulation and Neural Recordings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrophysiological signals were amplified relative to a cerebellar bone screw and were digitized at 1 kHz (RHD2132 and RHD2000, Intan Technologies). These signals were fed into a data acquisition device (NI-USB-6002, National Instruments), which was controlled by custom-made LabVIEW code running on a PC. The recording was begun by > 10 min baseline recording (Pre), followed by 1-h optical stimulation (Stim). Pulses of blue light (470 nm, PlexBright, Plexon) were delivered at 40 Hz (50% duty cycles) for one hour through the patch cable attached to the implanted optical fiber. The light output at tip of the fiber was 114–178 mW/mm2. The recording was finished by another > 10 min baseline recording (Post). The same procedure was repeated over three consecutive days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Neuronal Data Acquisition for Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 32-channel electrophysiology system (RHD2000, Intan Technologies) was used to record Ephys data. Signal was sampled at 20 KHz with a 7.5 KHz low-pass filter. The frame-synchronized video was also recorded (acA1920, Basler). Drive turning was carried out by a day-by-day basis based on the numbers of recorded single-unit activities in each brain area. A step of 50 μm was used when no units were recorded, and a step of 12.5 μm was used when low signal-noise ratio spikes shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Electrophysiological Recording of Auditory Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detailed recording procedures are the same as those described in previous works (McAlinden et al., 2015 (link); Scharf et al., 2016 (link); Yague et al., 2017 (link)). All electrophysiological recordings were performed in a single-walled acoustic chamber lined with three inches of acoustic absorption foam (MAC-3, IAC Acoustics). Mice were head-fixed and either a 32 or 64 channel silicon probe (A1 × 32–10 mm–25 s–177-A32 or A4 × 16–10 mm-50 s-177-A64, respectively, NeuroNexus Technologies) was inserted using a manual micromanipulator (SM-25A, Narishige) for AC recordings. Probes were inserted at a 40–50° angle to be perpendicular to the cortical surface (800–1000 μm depth from the cortical surface). The location of the electrode in AC was assessed by evaluating the local field potential (LFP) and multiunit activities (MUA) in response to white noise stimulation (see below).
Broadband signals were amplified (RHD2132, Intan Technologies, LLF) relative to the ground and were digitized at 20 kHz (RHD2132 and RHD2000, Intan Technologies, LLC). The recording session was initiated >30 min after the probe was inserted to its target depth, to allow for signal stabilization. A typical recording session consisted of >15 min baseline recording of spontaneous activity, followed by an optical stimulation protocol, sound presentation, and then another baseline of spontaneous activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synchronized Electrophysiology and Video Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A light-weight wired headstage (Intan, RHD2132) connected to the implanted arrays amplified and digitized the neural signal (sampling rate of 20 kHz), which was transmitted via a cable to the main control board of the electrophysiology acquisition system (Intan, RHD2000). A camera (Microsoft LifeCam Cinema 720p HD Webcam) was modified to be infrared sensitive and was mounted on the cage ceiling to track the position of the animal. A data acquisition device (USB-6212, National Instruments, Austin, TX) was used to control the LED arrays for visual stimulation and an infrared LED mounted within the field of view of the camera. The data acquisition system simultaneously sent a periodic “on” pulse signal to the electrophysiology acquisition system and to the LED in order to synchronize video and electrophysiology data for post-hoc analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Real-Time EEG/EMG Sleep State Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EEG/EMG signals were sampled at a rate of 1 kHz and digitally amplified with a gain of 1000 using a biopotential acquisition device (RHD2000, Intan Technologies, CA, USA). The signal was then filtered with a 0.1 Hz low‐pass filter, 7.5 kHz high‐pass filter, and 60 Hz notch filter. A custom‐written MATLAB program (Mathworks,) was used to partition the signal into 6‐s epochs and run the FFT analysis for each incoming epoch of real‐time signal. For every epoch, the FFT analysis determined the sleep/wake state of the mice by comparing the EEG/EMG power spectrum of the signal in the frequency domain. EEG delta waves (0.5–4 Hz) are dominant during NREM sleep, theta waves (4–8 Hz) are dominant during REM sleep, and alpha waves (8–12 Hz) are dominant during WAKE states. In addition, the EMG power is greatly reduced during sleep states, particularly during REM sleep. The baseline recording and analysis conducted on D1 determined the thresholds for REM, NREM, and WAKE states. An epoch was identified as NREM sleep when the EEG delta power was greater than the threshold and was identified as REM when the EMG power and EEG theta power were lower than the threshold values. A WAKE epoch was determined when the EMG power was 1.7 times greater than the threshold value.[48, 49] On D2, when the program detected a NREM epoch, the trigger for ultrasound stimulation was delivered.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In-vivo Neural Recordings in Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neural signals were acquired and amplified by multifunction input/output cards (PCI-6259, National Instruments, Austin, US) in rats or an electrophysiological recording system (RHD2000, Intan Technologies, Los Angeles, USA) in mice and digitized at 20 kHz. To increase the single unit yield, in case of the rat recordings, we waited 30 min for the tissue to stabilize after implantation, while implants in mice were inserted slowly (2 μm/s for MS, ~10 μm/s for CA1) with a motorized micromanipulator (Robot Stereotaxic, Neurostar, Tübingen, Germany) to minimize tissue damage163 (link). We carried out 30-min-long recordings in rats with 100 µm dorso-ventral separation, and 15-min-long recordings in mice at three distinct dorso-ventral positions within in the MS. Theta oscillations were induced by tail pinch (3 times 1 min in rats; once for 5 mins in mice).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electrophysiological Recording Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrophysiological recordings were performed via the RHD2000 evaluation system, using an ultra-thin SPI interface cable and a RHD2132 amplifier board (Intan Technologies). A custom-made Omnetics-to-MillMax adaptor was used to connect between the tetrodes and amplifier.31 (link) Recorded signals (sampled at 20 kHz) were synchronized with the video recording by a start signal sent through a custom-made triggering device and TTL signals from the camera to the recording system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!