The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 25.0 statistical package

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 25.0 is a comprehensive statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a wide range of advanced analytical tools for data management, statistical analysis, and reporting. The core function of SPSS 25.0 is to assist users in analyzing and interpreting complex data sets, enabling them to make informed decisions based on statistical insights.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using spss 25.0 statistical package

1

Determining Muscle Strength Thresholds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Allometrically scaled and absolute muscle strength areas under the curve were quantified using ROC analyses. The Youden index selected the most appropriate cut-off points with the best relationship between sensitivity and specificity for the primary outcome (poor mobility). Poor mobility was chosen as reference variable to propose weakness cut-off points because it is a relevant health-related outcome for older adults [36 ] and it was considered in other studies to propose cut-off points of muscle strength to identify sarcopenia [14 , 37 (link)].
For each body-size variable and sex, the ROC curves of non-normalized (continuous line) and normalized muscle strength (dashed lines) were compared to each other to decide the best cut-off point.
Analyzes were carried out using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package, and the ROC curves and Youden index with NCSS 2021 with a previously established level of significance (α = 5%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Physical Performance Comparison in Sports

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data encoding and data processing were carried out using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The normality of the variables has been analysed with the Shapiro–Wilk test. After a descriptive analysis (means and standard deviations), a comparison test was performed by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) in order to compare the physical performance variables between the three positions, and the repeated measures analysis of variance (repeated measures ANOVA) to compare the physical performance variables between the six matches. A Bonferroni post hoc test was used for pairwise comparisons in the ANOVA test and DMS test for repeated measures ANOVA. Effect size (ES; Cohen’s d) was included and evaluated as follows: 0–0.2 = trivial; 0.2−0.5 = small; 0.5−0.8 = moderate; and >0.8 high. The statistical significance criterion was established at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Physiological Stress Profiles Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data encoding and data processing were carried out using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The normality of the variables has been analyzed with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic. After a descriptive analysis (means and standard deviations), a comparison test was performed by the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Age and BMI were used as covariables because of their influence in the HRV parameters and the inter-individual variability [42 (link)]. TTM, WAI, and PSS groups were treated as factors, and RMSSD, %Recovery, and %Stress as dependent variables. A Bonferroni post-hoc test was used for pairwise comparisons. In addition, the confidence interval and effect size (ES; Cohen’s d) have been included. The ES was evaluated as follows: 0–0.2 = trivial; 0.2−0.5 = small; 0.5−0.8 = moderate; and >0.8 high. Finally, several regression estimations were performed to analyze the influence of TTM, WAI, and PSS classifications on the different physiological stress variables. All models were also controlled by sex, age, and BMI. The regression did not present normality or heteroscedasticity problems. Moreover, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) did not report any multicollinearity problems. The statistical significance criterion was established at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Predicting In-Stent Restenosis using Radiomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using dedicated statistical software (SPSS 25.0 statistical package; SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.) and the Deepwise research platform (https://keyan.deepwise.com, V1.6.2). Categorical variables are reported as percentages, and continuous variables as means (SDs) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Student’s t-test and the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test were used to assess if there were significant differences between patients with and without ISR. Interobserver agreements were calculated by ICC. Features with ICC > 0.75 were considered to be consistent. Cox regression was performed to determine which baseline characteristics were independently associated with ISR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and ISR prediction models were developed using clinical, conventional plaque features and selected radiomics features to calculate the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and sensitivity and specificity. The DeLong test was used to compare the radiomics model with the traditional and combined models.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Analysis of Treatment Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data is given as numbers and percentages or means and standard errors. Statistical comparisons between two groups were made using the χ2 test (categorical variables) or Student’s t test (quantitative variables). Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. All calculations were made using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis and processing were performed using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package. Normally distributed measures were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( x¯±s ), skewed counts were expressed as the median and interquartile range (IQR), and counts were expressed as the number n (%). First, all data were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For data that did not conform to a normal distribution, the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test was used to test for deviations between groups; for data that did conform to a normal distribution, the ANOVA test was used to test for chi-squaredness. Adverse events were analyzed using the chi-square test. Probit regression analysis was used to calculate ED50, ED95, and 95% CI. Sequential test plots and fitted dose-effect curves were produced using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software, and line comparison plots were produced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Altitude Effects on Ambulatory BP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on the values of the primary outcome variable (24-h ambulatory SBP) obtained in previous studies, at least 36 patients (18 per group) were required to identify a difference of 6 mmHg in the primary efficacy variable between altitude exposure conditions.
Descriptive statistics are presented as means and standard deviations and absolute and relative frequencies overall and separately for non-HT and HT subjects. Shapiro–Wilk test was used for assessing normality in group data. Log transformation was applied to data without normal distribution. Levene's test was used for assessing variance homogeneity. To determine the effects of altitude (3: sea level, SL; high altitude day 1, HA-D1; and high-altitude day 7, HA-D7) and group (2: NT and HT) effects on the primary outcome (24-h ambulatory SBP) and on other variables of interest (other ambulatory BP variables, clinic HR, SBP, DBP, and SpO2), a mixed model multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was applied. The follow-up was carried out by means of univariate analyses contrasts. Finally, in the case of significant effects, pairwise comparisons with Tukey correction were performed. The data were analyzed using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). For all statistical tests, an alpha level of 0.05 was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mortality Risk Assessment in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are shown as means and standard deviations or as numbers and percentages. Statistical comparisons between two groups were carried out with the Student’s t test (quantitative variables) or the χ-square test (categorical variables). Logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the combined effect of selected variables on mortality. The diagnostic accuracy of the McCabe and Charlson indices in predicting mortality was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis [18 (link)]. Statistical significance was set at p ≤0.05. All calculations were made using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Motivational Profiles and Physical Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables in the study, including means and standard deviations (Table 1). An analysis of bivariate correlations was performed for the study variables (Table 2). The subsequent focus was upon identifying distinct motivational profiles within the overall sample. A hierarchical cluster analysis using Ward’s method was conducted with the motivational variables from the BRSQ to help identify these motivational profiles. Subsequently, a confirmatory solution was attempted using a K means agglomerative method with a second sample. Finally, a hierarchical cluster analysis using Ward’s method was performed with the entire sample. To examine the characteristics of each motivational profile in relation to teacher controlling behaviors, the basic needs satisfaction variables, the perceived importance of physical education, the intention to be physical active and actual physical activity, a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted. All analyses were conducted using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Stroke Subgroups' Functional Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chi-square test was used for comparing categorical variables between groups, while Mann–Whitney test or Kruskal–Wallis test was used for continuous variables. The stroke severity and functional assessment scores of stroke subgroups were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A general linear model was used to estimate the impact of clinical variables on BI improvement. Statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS 25.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!