The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using cd105

1

Immunophenotyping of Porcine Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In addition, cells at passage 3 were immunophenotyped (Fig. 1) and stained for CD44 (Stem Cell Technologies), CD90 (Stem Cell Technologies), and CD105 (Novusbio). Primary antibodies were known to cross react with pig antigen and were detected with fluorescently tagged secondary antibodies, Alexafluor 488 anti-rat IgG (Life Technologies), Alexafluor 488 anti-mouse IgG (Life Technologies), and Alexafluor 594 anti-mouse Fab fragment (Cell Signaling). Images were captured using a Nikon 80i Epifluorescence microscope (Nikon) and a RTcmos camera (SPOT Imaging).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Characterization of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells cultured in a four-well chamber slide (Thermo Scientific, Rochester, NY, USA) were
rinsed with PBS and fixed with methanol/acetone. Sections were permeabilized using PBS
with 1% Triton 100 (PBS, Sigma-Aldrich) and blocked with PBS with 1% Triton 100, FcR
(Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA), goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich), for 1 h at room temperature.
Primary antibodies used were CD105, CD90, and CD73 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO,
USA). After overnight incubation in a humid chamber at 4°C with the primary antibody,
secondary staining was done with a secondary AF488 antibody (Invitrogen) for 1 h at room
temperature. Samples were washed three times with PBS-triton and were mounted using Aqua
Poly/Mount (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). Cells were studied using a Nikon Eclipse
50i microscope with a Nikon DS Fi1 camera and software for image acquisition (Nikon) and
Olympus Fluoview 1000 confocal microscopy (Olympus, Center Valley, PA, USA) at CBI
(University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunophenotyping of Mesenchymal Cell Types

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antigen phenotype of three representatives in each case of ASCs, BMSCs, DSCs and FBs was characterized with a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur analyzer and Cell Quest Software, Becton Dickinson Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany), using conjugated antibodies against pig CD45, HLA‐DR, CD29, CD79alpha, CD14, CD31 (AbDSerotec), CD105, CD26 (Novus), CD73 (R&D Systems), CD90 (BD), CD34 (abcam), and against mouse CD44 (BD) [was used because of cross‐reactivity (Boxall and Jones, 2012)]. An appropriate isotype‐matched control antibody was used as control in all analyses. FACS‐analysis was performed with cells of Passage 1.
For flow cytometer analysis, the respective cells were detached with 0.5% trypsin/0.02% EDTA, washed, centrifuged at 200 g for 5 min, and reestablished on ice for 15 min. The cells were then centrifuged at 200 g for 5 min again and resuspended in CellWash® (Becton Dickinson Company) containing 3% FBS, and stained for 30 min with the fluorophore‐conjugated antibodies. After a further washing step with CellWash/FCS, the samples were analysed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phenotypic Characterization of ADSCs and WJ-MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ADSCs and WJ-MSCs were detached using 0.25% trypsin EDTA (Gibco), and the collected cells were washed with PBS containing 1% BSA. The cells were divided into 1 × 106 cells and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with primary antibodies against CD34 (Bioss, Beijing, China), CD45 (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, clone number. 4E9B2), CD73 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), CD90 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and CD105 (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA, clone number. MEM-229). The cells were then washed with PBS containing 1% BSA and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with secondary antibodies against PE-conjugated anti-rabbit (R&D Systems, MN, USA), PE-conjugated anti-sheep (R&D Systems, MN, USA), and APC-conjugated anti-mouse (R&D Systems, MN, USA) antibodies. Appropriate secondary antibodies were used according to the primary antibodies. Unlabeled cells and those labelled only with the secondary antibody were used as negative controls. Subsequently, the cells were washed with PBS containing 1% BSA. The fluorescence of the stained samples was analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and BD CellQuest Pro software v9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Immunofluorescent Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies used for immunofluorescent staining were MUC1 (clone 214D4, Cat. No. 05-652, EMD Millipore), EIG121 (Cat. No. ab156275, Abcam), EGFR (clone H11, Cat. No. MS-316-P1, NeoMarkers), PSA (Cat. No. NB200-135, Novus Biologicals), CD105 (clone 209701, Cat. No. MAB1320, R&D Systems), vimentin (clone EPR3776, Cat. No. ab92547, Abcam), CD10 (clone F-4, Cat. No. sc-46656, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and HDAC2 (Cat. No. sc-7899, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Antibodies without an indicated clone ID are rabbit polyclonal. Secondary antibodies included Alexa Fluor® goat anti-mouse IgG 488 (Cat. No. A11029), Alexa Fluor® goat anti-rat IgG 488 (Cat. No. A11006), and Alexa Fluor® goat anti-rabbit IgG 568 (Cat. No. A11011), all obtained from Life Technologies. Antibodies were used at the following combinations and concentrations: EGFR (1:200) and goat-anti-mouse-AF488 (1:200), PSA (1:100) and goat-anti-rabbit-AF568 (1:100), CD105 (1:50) and goat-anti-rat-AF488 (1:200), vimentin (1:200) and goat-anti-rabbit-AF568 (1:100), MUC1 (1:100) and goat-anti-mouse-AF488 (1:200), EIG121 (1:50) and goat-anti-rabbit-AF568 (1:100), CD10 (1:100) and goat-anti-mouse-AF488 (1:200), HDAC2 (1:50) and goat-anti-rabbit-AF568 (1:100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scaffold-Mediated Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the ability of the various scaffolds on recruiting SMSCs in vivo, the PCL, PCL/MECM, and PCL/MECM-KGN μS scaffolds were implanted in the meniscus of the Sprague–Dawley rats. CD73 and CD105, which were defined as MSC markers and assessed by immunofluorescence staining to determine the endogenous MSC recruitment capacity of the three scaffolds. Briefly, after the samples were harvested, we used 4% paraformaldehyde to fix them at room temperature for 30 min, and then, the target antigens were retrieved by 2% sodium citrate for 20 min and blocked by 10% goat serum. Subsequently, the samples were incubated with primary antibodies against CD73 (1:150, Novus Biologicals) and CD105 (1:150, Novus Biologicals) at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies, which were conjugated with Alexa Fluor488 and Fluor594 (1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) for 1 h and DAPI (1:1000, Life Technologies) for 10 min. The samples were imaged by a TCS-SP8 confocal microscope (Leica, Germany) to determine the total cell numbers and CD29 and CD90 double-labeled cell numbers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Analysis of MSC Recruitment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight healthy, 18‐week‐old male Sprague Dawley rats weighing 200–220 g were employed for the in vivo ESPC recruitment study. This study was designed with four groups as follows: the (A) control group, (B) GE hydrogel group, (C) Apt‐hydrogel group, and (D) Apt/GF‐hydrogel group (n = 4 knees in each group). More information about animal surgery is given in Data S1 1.5.
To evaluate the cell lineage recruited to the defect site, CD73 and CD105, which were defined as MSC markers, were assessed by immunofluorescence staining. Briefly, samples (n = 4 knees) were first fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 min at room temperature. The target antigens were retrieved by immersing the specimens in 2% sodium citrate for 20 min and blocking them with 10% goat serum. Subsequently, the specimens were incubated overnight at 4°C with CD73 (1:200, Novus Biologicals) and CD105 (1:100, Novus Biologicals). The next day, the samples were washed and incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor488 and Fluor594 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the samples were counterstained with DAPI (1:1000, Life Technologies) to label the nuclei and observed with a Leica TCS‐SP8 confocal microscope (Leica, Germany). The number of total cells and CD73/CD105 double‐positive cells were analyzed with ImageJ software (USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!