The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Model uv 1601 pc

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The Shimadzu UV-1601 PC is a compact, double-beam UV-Visible spectrophotometer designed for general-purpose laboratory applications. It features a wavelength range of 190 to 1100 nm and a spectral bandwidth of 1.0 nm. The instrument is equipped with a PC interface for data acquisition and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using model uv 1601 pc

1

Quantifying Liposomal Drug Entrapment Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Percent entrapment efficiency (EE %) of FTN was calculated by indirect measurement of free FTN (unentrapped FTN) (Abdelbary & AbouGhaly, 2015 (link)). Briefly, 1 mL of resulted formula was exposed to centrifugation via a cooling centrifuge (3K30, Sigma, Germany) at 21,000 rpm for 1 hour at 4 °C. The clear supernatant was isolated and diluted. The concentration of unentrapped FTN was spectrophotometrically assessed (Shimadzu, model UV-1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan) at λmax 252 nm using the calibration curve (n = 3, R2= 0.9998). The EE % was calculated applying the following equation (Sayed et al., 2020 (link)):
EE %=(total amount of FTN total amount of free FTN)total amount of FTN X 100
Total amount of FTN is the real weighed quantity, total amount of free FTN (quantity of FTN in supernatant)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Determining Niosome Entrapment Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Entrapment efficiency (EE %) was determined experimentally employing the dialysis method, via cellulose tubing (Trotta et al., 2002 (link)). Five mL of each of the prepared niosomes was filled inside a dialysis bag having a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) 12,000 Daltons (Da) (Sigma diagnostics, St. Louis, MO, USA). Each dialysis bag was tied from both ends and suspended in 100 mL phosphate buffer saline (pH 6.8) for 4 hours (h) at 37 °C ± 0.5 (Abd-El-Azim et al., 2018 (link)). The concentration of RPG in the dialysate was determined spectrophotometrically (Shimadzu, model UV-1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan) at the maximum wavelength of RPG (241 nm) (Gadadare et al., 2015 (link)). Drug-free niosomes in dialysis bag, treated similarly to RPG-niosomes, provided blank readings at 241 nm.
Percentage of entrapped drug was calculated using the following equation:
EE%=CtCfCt*100
(Mehta et al., 2011 )where, Ct represents the total amount of RPG present in 5 mL noisomes formulation and Cf represents the amount of free, dialyzed RPG. All experiments were done in triplicate (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of RSV Entrapment Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extent of RSV entrapped within the vesicles was assessed using indirect technique for computing the free (unentrapped) RSV (Abdelbary and AbouGhaly, 2015 (link)). In cooling centrifuge (Sigma 3–30 KS, Germany), one milliliter of each PB was centrifuged for 1 hr at 4 °C and speed 20000 rpm. Then the supernatant was diluted and assessed for determination of RSV concentration utilizing UV/Vis spectrophotometer at λmax = 290 nm (Shimadzu, model UV-1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan) (Negi et al., 2017 (link)). RSV EE% was calculated by the use the equation as following:
EE%=Total amount of RSVUnentrapped RSV Total amount of RSV× 100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Efficient Quantification of Terpene-Loaded Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The direct technique was conducted for the estimation of the EE%, DL% of ZT in the terpesomal dispersions [29 (link)]. Briefly, terpesomal dispersions (1 mL) were ultra-centrifuged, at 22,000 rpm (Sigma 3–30 KS, Sigma Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Germany) for 1 h at 4 °C. The residues, composed of the ZT-loaded terpesomes, were lysed and solubilized by sonication with ethanol (Crest ultrasonics corp., Trenton, USA). The entrapped ZT concentrations were assessed spectrophotometrically after appropriate dilution with ethanol (Shimadzu, model UV-1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan) at λmax 285.6 nm [7 (link)]. In a parallel line, drug-free terpesomes were used as controls [22 (link)].
ZT EE% was calculated as follows; EE%=EntrappedamountofZT(mg)TotalamountofZT(mg)×100
ZT DL% was calculated as follows; DL%=EntrappedamountofZT(mg)Totalweightofterpesomes(mg)×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Solubility of HK in Various Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The practical solubility of HK in different oils used for NCs preparation (almond oil, castor oil, or isopropyl myristate) was determined by the shake-flask saturation method.14 (link) Excess amount of HK (5 mg) was placed in glass vials containing 1 mL of the (almond oil, castor oil, or isopropyl myristate), sealed and shaken at 100 rpm for two days at 37°C. After centrifugation, an aliquot from the supernatant was withdrawn and mixed with acetone and ethanol mixture (1:1 v/v). The solubility of HK in different oils was determined by using a UV spectrophotometer (Model UV-1601 PC; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and measuring the absorbance at 294 nm.24 (link) The amount of soluble HK was estimated according to relevant standard plots. Standard plots were obtained after testing the solubility of five different concentrations of HK (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 mg/mL) in each oil type separately. Each HK concentration was treated as previously mentioned and the UV absorbance was measured. A linear relationship was plotted between absorbance and HK concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In Vitro Drug Release of Lipid-Based Nanocarriers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro drug release experiment was performed for SPR-BS and free SPR suspension (control) using the bag diffusion technique [29 (link)]. Dialysis bags (Visking®, MWCO 12,000–14,000, Serva, Denver, CO, USA) containing F3, F4, and SPR were immersed in PBS (pH 6.8) ensuring sink conditions [87 (link)]. Bags were placed in a shaking water bath (100 rpm) (Memmert GmbH, Schwabach, Germany) at 32 ± 0.5 °C [29 (link)]. At predetermined time intervals, samples were withdrawn and compensated with fresh medium. The amount of SPR released was determined using UV spectroscopy (Shimadzu, model UV-1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan) at 620 nm [85 (link)]. The experiment was conducted in triplicates and data were expressed as the mean ± SD. The SPR release mechanism from the developed nanocarrier was investigated using DD Solver 1.0 Software (Microsoft Excel add in program, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) [88 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Encapsulation Efficiency of Curcumin-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The percentage of CLT encapsulated into SPs was measured using indirect way by calculating the difference between the amount of CLT added in the vesicles and the amount remaining after separating the supernatant from the prepared SPs using cooling ultracentrifuge at 25,000 rpm for 1 hour at 4°C (Sigma 3–30 KS, Sigma Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Germany). The unentrapped CLT concentration was determined by measuring the wavelength of the UV spectrum at 261 nm using ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, model UV-1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan). The EE% of the drug was calculated using this equation:10 (link),12 (link)
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage[substack]{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\DeclareFontFamily{T1}{linotext}{}
\DeclareFontShape{T1}{linotext}{m}{n} {linotext }{}
\DeclareSymbolFont{linotext}{T1}{linotext}{m}{n}
\DeclareSymbolFontAlphabet{\mathLINOTEXT}{linotext}
\begin{document}
$${\rm{EE}}\left(\rm \% \right) = {{{\rm{Total\ amount\ of\ CLT}} - {\rm{Unentrapped\ CLT}}} \over {{\rm{Total\ amount\ of\ CLT}}}} \times 100$$
\end{document}
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Entrapment Efficiency of Drug-Loaded Invasomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EE% of the drug was estimated, in triplicates, according to the direct technique. Briefly, 1 mL of each invasomal dispersion was ultra-centrifuged at 22000 rpm (Sigma 3–30 KS, Sigma Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Germany) for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant, containing the unentrapped drug, was discarded, while the drug-loaded pellet was dissolved in ethanol by sonication. The AGM concentration was measured spectrophotometrically (Shimadzu, model UV-1601 PC, Kyoto, Japan) after appropriate dilution at λmax 276 nm.24 (link)
Parallel studies, using drug-free invasomes, were conducted as controls. The EE% of AGM was calculated according to the following equation,
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage[substack]{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\DeclareFontFamily{T1}{linotext}{}
\DeclareFontShape{T1}{linotext}{m}{n} {linotext }{}
\DeclareSymbolFont{linotext}{T1}{linotext}{m}{n}
\DeclareSymbolFontAlphabet{\mathLINOTEXT}{linotext}
\begin{document}
$$EE\% = {{{\rm Entrapped\,amount\,of\,AGM\,(mg)}} \over {{\rm Total\,theoretical\,amount\,of\,AGM\,(mg)}}} \times 100$$
\end{document}
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Encapsulation Efficiency of siRNA and Dox in SNALPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The encapsulation efficiency (EE %) of both siRNA or Dox was quantified indirectly by measuring the difference between the total amount of siRNA or Dox added during the preparation of SNALPs and the quantity of non-entrapped amounts remaining in the filtrate after the SNALPs were buffer exchanged. The siRNA amount was determined using gel red assay technique using previously constructed calibration curve. In brief: to construct the calibration curve, different volumes of siRNA were mixed with gel red (3 µl, 1:1000) then the volume was adjusted to 100 µl with Tris buffer pH 7. The coefficient of determination (R2) of the siRNA calibration curve in Tris buffer pH 7 in the concentration range of 0.1-1 nM, was 0.9977 (Figure S1A). The amount of siRNA was determined using UV-vis spectrofluorometer at excitation and emission of 300 and 590 nm respectively (Model UV-1601 PC; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The amount of Dox was determined using previously constructed standard plot of serial concentrations of Dox in PBS pH 7.4 by measuring the absorbance at 480 nm as reported in the literature 26
(Figure S1B). The EE % of either siRNA or Dox was calculated as follows:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quercetin-Loaded Niosomal Encapsulation Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Encapsulation efficiency (EE%) for quercetin loaded niosomes was calculated by measuring the free quercetin concentration in the niosomal dispersion. The unencapsulated drug was separated by centrifugal filters (Nanosep® centrifuge tube) with Mw cutoff 100 kDa. Then, 0.5 mL samples of the prepared niosomes were transferred to the upper chamber of the Nanosep® and then centrifuged for 120 min, at 6000 rpm. The amount of unencapsulated quercetin in the collecting chamber liquid was measured by measuring the absorbance at 370 nm, using UV–vis spectrophotometer (Model UV–1601PC; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), as previously described [33 (link)].
The EE (%) was calculated by using the following equation: EE(%)=[Drug]total[Drug]free[Drug]total ×100
where [Drug]total is the total amount of added drug, and [Drug]free is the amount of unencapsulated free drug.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!