The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas 9.3 version

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS 9.3 is a software version designed for statistical analysis and data management. It provides a suite of tools for data manipulation, statistical modeling, and reporting. The core function of SAS 9.3 is to enable users to efficiently analyze and interpret data, supporting decision-making processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

10 protocols using sas 9.3 version

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were expressed as the mean ± standard error of means (SEM). All data were analyzed by the Student t test and a P value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant (SAS 9.3 version; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Soybean Agronomics and Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Factorial analysis of variance for all collected data was performed following the procedure of Gomez and Gomez (1984) , using the statistical analysis system computer software SAS 9.3 version (SAS Institute Inc, 2008 ). The normality of the data was tested by using the scatter plot technique. The treatments that showed significant differences was subjected to least significant difference (LSD) test for mean separation at 0.05 probability level. Furthermore, correlation analysis was made to determine the relationship between the agronomics and quality attributes of soybean. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship of grain yield with other selected plant traits and oil content with protein content.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multivariate Analysis of Antihypertensive Medication Adherence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the analyses were performed using statistical analysis software (SAS) 9.3 version. Descriptive analysis was used for continuous variables: mean, SD, standard error (SE) and categorical variables: frequency tables: absolute and relative frequencies. MPR for FG-LR was categorized in ranges of 0≤MPR<0.3, 0.3≤MPR<0.5, 0.5≤MPR<0.8, and 0.8≤MPR<1. MPR was analyzed using descriptive statistics, whereas factors affecting MPR were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate variation in MPR values among AHT drugs. P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Appalachia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Age of participants was presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), all other continuous or discrete variables were presented as medians (interquartile range, IQR), frequencies, or percentages as appropriate. Serum cotinine levels were log-transformed due to skewed distribution. Approximately 51% (n=162) of the samples in our study were below the level of detection (0.05 ng/mL), however, reported actual values were used for statistical analyses. SHS exposure prevalence in our study cohort were compared to (1) national estimates using NHANES 2007–2008 data1 and (2) estimates from total states containing Appalachian counties (n=13), and Ohio, using the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) data.11 A two-tailed P-value of <0.05 was used to judge statistical significance. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 version (SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Echocardiographic Measurements: Retrospective and Prospective Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and echocardiographic measures. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± SD, or mean (10th, and 80thpercentile [P10, P80]), as appropriate. Categorical variables were presented by the absolute and relative frequencies or as numbers and percentages. Comparisons between the retrospective and prospective samples were performed using independent-samples t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of IVSd, LVPWd, LVEDD, LVESD and LVM measurements were determined in 100 randomly selected patients using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A 2-sided p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and performed by using SAS 9.3 version (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the collected data were first checked for fitting the analysis of variance (ANOVA) assumptions. Then, all data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS 9.3 version (SAS, 2012 ). Means were compared by using least significant difference (LSD) test at 5% probability level. The significant difference between the treatment mean were separated by using a letters from a to z. Homogeneity of the variance (Bartlett's test) was tested by using Minitab 15 (Minitab version 15, Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA) statistical software to check the validity of the data and transformation of data was carried out for those who failed the test. The presentation of the mean values was done after retransformation of the transformed data's were carried out.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Appalachia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Age of participants was presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), all other continuous or discrete variables were presented as medians (interquartile range, IQR), frequencies, or percentages as appropriate. Serum cotinine levels were log-transformed due to skewed distribution. Approximately 51% (n=162) of the samples in our study were below the level of detection (0.05 ng/mL), however, reported actual values were used for statistical analyses. SHS exposure prevalence in our study cohort were compared to (1) national estimates using NHANES 2007–2008 data1 and (2) estimates from total states containing Appalachian counties (n=13), and Ohio, using the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) data.11 A two-tailed P-value of <0.05 was used to judge statistical significance. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 version (SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Normality Testing and Variance Homogenization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data were tested for the normality using Sapiro -Wilkin test. Non normal data was normalized by square root transformation then Homogeneity of error variances of nonsegregating generations was tested by using Bartlett's test (Bartlett, 1937) , and when the variances were heterogeneous at 1 % and 5% level of significance the data was transformed by dividing observations of each environment/year by the square root of MSE of that environment/year which makes the error variances homogeneous and pooled analysis was performed on transformed data. SAS 9.3 version was utilized for ANOVA, correlation and regression calculations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Associations with Major Depressive Disorder and Obesity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For association studies, chi-square (Chi 2 ) or Fisher exact tests for binomial variables were used. Differences in genotype frequencies as well as deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were assessed using Chi² test. All genetic analyses for CRTC1 SNPs were performed using a dominant model (wild type vs. variant allele carriers), the same model used for the previously mentioned psychiatric samples (Choong et al., 2013) .
Multivariable regression analyses were used to test the association between the CRTC1 SNPs and MDD adjusting for age, sex and BMI. For PsyCoLaus data, a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) adjusted for age and sex was used to test the association between CRTC1 rs6510997C>T polymorphism and obesity markers (BMI, fat mass and waist circumference) using SAS 9.3 version (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). In a first step, we tested for the interaction between CRTC1 SNPs and MDD status for an effect on obesity markers. For the Radiant and NESDA/NTR studies BMI was the only available obesity marker. For the data of these studies, linear regression models adjusted for age, sex and principal components were used to test the association between CRTC1 polymorphisms and BMI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Oral Cavity Cancer Epidemiology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Softwares such as © SAS 9.3 version (SAS Institute Inc, Sas North Carolina, US), © MS-FoxPro 6.0 version (MS-FoxPro, Washington State, US), MS-Excel, IARC/IACR tools, and IARC-crg. Tools were used for data collection, sorting, check, and statistics. In our study, we calculated several variables including crude incidence rate, mortality, China age standardized rate (National Population Structure in 2000), world age standardized rate (world Segi's population), cumulative rate, age-specific rate, truncated rate, and so on. Cumulative rate expresses the probability of the onset of oral cavity cancer between birth and specific age (74 years old). Truncated rate is the calculation of rates over the truncated age of 35-64 years old, using WHO world standard population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!