The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using anti mouse igg1

1

Quantifying RSV-specific Antibody Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ELISA-plates were coated with 5x105 plaque-forming units (PFU) heat-inactivated RSV-A2 in 100 μl carbonate buffer (50 mM carbonate/bicarbonate, pH 9.6) per well overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, the binding sites were blocked with 5% skimmed milk in PBS-T (PBS including 0.05% Tween-20) for one hour at room temperature and the plates were washed with PBS-T. Sera, diluted in 2% skimmed milk in PBS-T, were added to the wells. After 1h incubation at 4°C and three washing steps, secondary detection antibodies were added for 1h at RT: HRP-coupled anti-mouse Ig (1:1000, polyclonal, Daco), anti-mouse IgG1 (1:1000, clone X56, BD Biosciences), anti-mouse IgG2a (1:1000, clone R19-15, BD Biosciences), or anti-mouse IgA (1:5000, polyclonal, Bethyl Laboratories). Plates were washed seven times before ECL solution was added and the signal (relative light units per second, RLU/s) acquired on a microplate luminometer (VICTOR X5, PerkinElmer) using PerkinElmer 2030 Manager software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Murine Immune Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies to mouse CD4 (clone GK1.5), CD40 (hamster; clone HM40-3), CD25 (clone PC61.5), lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG3; clone eBioC9B7W), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) (clone J43), glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein (GITR; clone DTA-1), inducible T-cell costimulator (ICOS; clone 7E.17G9), cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4; clone UC10-4B9), forkhead box P3 (FoxP3; clone FJK-16s), MHC II (clone M5/114.15.2), CD80 (clone 16-10A1), CD86 (clone GL1), OX40L (clone RM134L), CD40L (clone RM134L), ICOS ligand (ICOS L; clone HK5.3), PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1; clone MIH5), PD-1 ligand 2 (PD-L2; clone122) and isotype control antibodies, including the hamster IgG control (cat. No, 14-4888-81) for the anti-CD40 antibodies, were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA). Anti-mouse IgG1 and IgE were from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). All paramagnetic sorting beads and columns were from Miltenyi Biotec (Auburn, CA). Escherichia coli 0127:B8 LPS and OVA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON). GM-CSF and IL-10 were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Depletion of IgG and IgG Subclasses from Mouse Anti-β-LG Serum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse anti-β-LG serum was diluted ten-fold in PBS-HS. For the depletion of IgG, diluted antiserum samples were then mixed with an equal amount of Protein G Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) or Sepharose 4B (SIGMA-ALDRICH, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and incubated for 2 h at room temperature on a rotating platform. Following incubation, the antiserum samples were recovered by centrifugation (500×g for 5 min at room temperature). In order to deplete IgG-subclasses, Streptavidin Sepharose High Performance (GE Healthcare) was mixed with double its volume of each of the following biotinylated rat mAbs at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. IgG-subclass specific antibodies (BD Biosciences); anti-mouse IgG1 (clone A85-1, IgG1, κ), anti-mouse IgG2a (clone R19-15, IgG1, κ), anti-mouse IgG2b (clone R12-3, IgG2a, κ), and anti-mouse IgG3 (clone R40-82, IgG2a, κ), and isotype controls (BioLegend) for IgG1 (clone RTK2071) and IgG2a (clone RTK2758). The antibody-bound beads were subsequently washed five times with PBS-HS. Incubation with mouse anti-β-LG serum followed by recovery of the serum samples was carried out as described above. The depletion of IgG and IgG-subclasses from the antiserum was confirmed by ELISA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HDM-Specific Antibody Detection Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ninety six‐well plates were coated overnight with 0.01% HDM in PBS and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS before the addition of plasma samples that had been diluted 1:5 in blocking buffer and standards for 1 hour. Plates were washed 6× with PBS containing 0.05% Tween‐20 before incubation with biotinylated antimouse IgE or antimouse IgG1 (Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) at a concentration of 2 µg/mL for 1 hour. Next, plates were washed for additional six times, streptavidin‐horseradish peroxidase (R&D Systems) was added for 30 minutes and the amount of bound HDM‐specific antibody was determined using TMB substrate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Bacteria-Antibody Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess bacteria–antibody interactions, 3 × 107 cultured bacteria were incubated with various concentrations of 7-6IgA or 76-3IgG in a final volume of 200 μl in PBS for 1 h at 37°C. After washing with PBS, bacteria were stained with FITC or Alexa647 (Molecular Probes)-conjugated anti-mouse IgA (Southern Biotech), anti-mouse IgG1 (Clone A85-1; BD), and SybrGreen (Molecular Probes). For OVA-IgA inhibition assay, various amounts of 7-6IgA were preincubated with 10× volume of OVA (Sigma) at 37°C for 0.5 h, and then the 7-6IgA–OVA immune complexes were incubated with B. theta at 37°C for 1 h. For the 7-6IgA LPS binding assay, cultured, untreated B. theta (live) was heat killed (70°C, 30 min) or fixed with 70% ethanol (room temperature, 15 min), washed with PBS, and incubated with 7-6IgA and secondary antibodies as above. All samples were acquired on LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences), and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software (v9.3.2 and v10.0.6; TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of donor-reactive antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Donor- and third party- reactive antibody titers in recipient serum were determined on day 14 post-transplant and at the time of graft rejection as previously published (20 (link)). Briefly, donor BALB/c and third party SJL thymocytes were incubated with 100μl of serially diluted serum. Fluorochrome-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2b, anti-mouse IgG1, anti-mouse IgG2c, and anti-mouse IgG3 were used as detecting antibodies at a 1:50 – 1:100 dilution (all from BD Pharmingen). Cells were washed and analyzed by flow cytometry. The titer of BALB/c-reactive IgG alloantibody in serum was calculated as previously published (5 (link), 21 (link)). For each IgG isotype, the dilution that returned the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) to the level observed with a 1:90 dilution of naïve B6 serum was divided by two and reported as the titer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SRBC Antibody Titer Measurement by ELISA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibody titers of SRBC-specific in serum were measured by ELISA, as previously reported (33 (link)). Briefly, 96 well Nunc-Immuno plates (Sigma) were coated with SRBC membrane protein overnight at 4 °C. Wells were blocked with 10% FCS and diluted serum was added and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. A peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG1 (BD), anti-mouse IgG or anti-mouse IgM Abs (Sigma) were used as secondary Ab.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Antibody Isotypes in Vaccinated Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ELISAs were performed as above with modifications: serial dilutions of vaccinated mouse sera started at 1:33.3 instead of 1:100. Naive unvaccinated controls were also added at this final dilution. Following the 2-h incubation, 50 μL of biotin-conjugated secondary rat antibodies specific for each isotype, anti-mouse IgG1 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ), anti-mouse IgG2a (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and anti-mouse IgG2b (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ), were diluted to 1 μg/mL in blocking buffer and added to the plate. After a 1-h incubation shaking at room temperature, 50 μL of ExtrAvidin-Peroxidase (1:2,500; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added directly to each well, without washing, and the plate was incubated for 30 min shaking at room temperature. Plates were washed prior to development using SigmaFast OPD solution for 10 min, as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flow Cytometry Analysis of CD205 Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CHO/mCD205 cells were incubated with anti-mCD205/OVA or anti-mCD205/Ins2, followed by the allophycocyanin-labeled secondary antibody anti-mouse IgG1 (BD Biosciences). For specific detection of the proinsulin moiety of anti-mCD205/Ins2, the detection reagents used were 5 μg/ml biotinylated anti-proinsulin (R&D Systems), followed by 5 μg/ml streptavidin-allophycocyanin (BD Biosciences). After washing, cells were resuspended in 5 μg/ml DAPI (Sigma) before proceeding to data acquisition. Flow cytometry data were acquired using a BD FACScan or LSRII and analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibody Characterization in Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following commercial primary antibodies were used: 1:1,000 anti‐phospho‐NF‐κB (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); 1:1,000 anti‐NF‐kB and 1:1,000 anti‐VCAM1 (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom); 1:200 anti‐paxillin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany); and 1:4,000 anti‐β‐actin (Sigma‐Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). Secondary antibodies were as follows: 1:1,000 anti‐rabbit IgG Horseradish peroxidase linked F(ab’)2 I fragment (from donkey) (GE Healthcare, GE, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom); 1:3,000 anti‐mouse IgG1 (BD Pharmingen, Beckton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); and 1:400 Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated anti‐mouse (from donkey) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!