The sialic acid level of the purified rhEPO was examined using the OPD-labeling method as previously described26 (link). Briefly, sialic acid moieties from the purified rhEPO were released using 0.5 M NaHSO4 at 80 °C for 20 min. Released sialic acid was labeled with OPD (o-phenylenediamine-2HCl; Sigma) at 80 °C for 40 min. The level of OPD-labeled sialic acid was determined using C18 reversed-phase column (Shim-pack CLC-ODS; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with 474 scanning fluorescence detector (excitation at 230 nm and emission at 420 nm, Waters).
474 scanning fluorescence detector
The 474 scanning fluorescence detector is a versatile lab equipment product manufactured by Waters Corporation. It is designed to detect and measure fluorescent compounds in liquid chromatography applications. The core function of this detector is to provide highly sensitive and selective detection of fluorescent analytes, enabling researchers and analysts to accurately quantify and identify compounds of interest in their samples.
Lab products found in correlation
8 protocols using 474 scanning fluorescence detector
Purification and Sialic Acid Analysis of Recombinant Erythropoietin
The sialic acid level of the purified rhEPO was examined using the OPD-labeling method as previously described26 (link). Briefly, sialic acid moieties from the purified rhEPO were released using 0.5 M NaHSO4 at 80 °C for 20 min. Released sialic acid was labeled with OPD (o-phenylenediamine-2HCl; Sigma) at 80 °C for 40 min. The level of OPD-labeled sialic acid was determined using C18 reversed-phase column (Shim-pack CLC-ODS; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with 474 scanning fluorescence detector (excitation at 230 nm and emission at 420 nm, Waters).
HPLC Quantification of 5-HIAA
Quantification of Glutathione in BAL Fluid
Quantifying GABA in Differentiated Cells
Purification and Characterization of ORP4L Variants
Peptidoglycan Characterization Protocol
HPLC Separation of Carotenoid Pigments
The running method used two solvents, A and B. Solvent A was composed of: 0.85% methanol, 0.12% methyl tert‐butyl ether (MBTE), 0.03% H20, and 0.45 g/L ammonium acetate. Solvent B was composed of 0.08% methanol, 0.90% MBTE, 0.02% H20, and 0.2 g/L ammonium acetate. Samples were run at a constant flow of 0.4 mL/min with A and B buffers. After the column was equilibrated, 20 μL of sample was injected. Then the following separation protocol was run: 21 min linear gradient from 100% solvent A to 45% solvent A, 1 min at 45% solvent A, 11 min linear gradient to 5% solvent A, 4 min at 5% solvent A, 2 min linear gradient to 100% solvent A, and 21 min at 100% solvent A. Peaks were identified using Empower 3 Software (Waters) and external calibration standards from Sigma–Aldrich.
Plasma Malondialdehyde Quantification via HPLC
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!