The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 chamber glass bottom vessel

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The 8-chamber glass bottom vessel is a laboratory equipment designed for cell culture and imaging applications. It consists of a clear glass bottom and eight separate chambers, allowing for the simultaneous observation and analysis of multiple samples or cell populations. The product's core function is to provide a controlled environment for cell growth and observation during various experimental procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using 8 chamber glass bottom vessel

1

Laser Micro-Irradiation and Focal Recruitment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For laser micro-irradiation, 5 × 104 cells were seeded into each well of an 8-chamber glass bottom vessel (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA; Cat# 155409). After 24 h, laser micro-irradiation and subsequent time-lapse imaging were performed using a Nikon A1rsi laser scanning confocal microscope equipped with 6 visible wavelength lasers (405, 441, 514, 561, 647 nm, Coherent), customized to add a UVA 355 nm laser (PicoQuant; Berlin, Germany) controlled by a Bruker XY Galvanometer, and equipped with a live-cell incubation chamber (Tokai Hit; Shizuoka, Japan) maintained at 5% CO2 and 37 °C, using a 20× (NA = 0.8) non-immersion objective for 405 nm laser micro-irradiation. For experiments using PARPi (ABT-888; 10 μM) or PARGi (PDD00017273; 10 μM), cells were treated with the compounds for 1 h prior to micro-irradiation. Micro-irradiation was performed at 100% laser power with a stimulation time of 0.125 s per site. For parallel irradiation, time lapse images were collected every 15 s during a 20 min interval. Images of focal recruitment were quantified using MIDAS for quantitation of and statistical analysis of focal recruitment [5 (link)]. Forty individual cells (2 sets of 10 cells were performed on 2 separate days) were analyzed and used to generate recruitment profiles and kinetic parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Actin and Nucleus Fluorescence Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A549/LivePAR cells were seeded into each well of an 8-chamber glass bottom vessel (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA; Cat# 155409) at a density of 5 × 104 cells per well. After 24 h, cells were washed twice with 1XPBS, then fixed with 4% formaldehyde while simultaneously staining with Alexa Fluor 647 phalloidin (Invitrogen; Waltham, MA, USA; Cat# A22287) and NucBlue Fixed ReadyProbes reagent (Invitrogen; Waltham, MA, USA; Cat# R37606) for 30 min at 4 °C according to the manufacturer protocols. Cells were washed three times with 1XPBS, and cells were imaged using a Nikon A1rsi laser scanning confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Laser Micro-Irradiation and Focal Recruitment Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For laser micro-irradiation, 5×104 cells were seeded into each well of an 8-chamber glass bottom vessel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #155409). Twenty-four (24) hrs later, laser micro-irradiation and subsequent time-lapse imaging were performed using a Nikon A1rsi laser scanning confocal microscope equipped with 6 visible wavelength lasers (405, 441, 514, 561, 647nm, Coherent), customized to add a UVA 355nm laser (PicoQuant) controlled by a Bruker XY Galvanometer, and equipped with a live-cell incubation chamber (Tokai Hit) maintained at 5% CO2 and 37°C, using a 40x (NA=1.4) oil-immersion objective for 355nm laser micro-irradiation. For parallel irradiation, time lapse images were collected every 15 s during a 10 min interval. Images of focal recruitment were quantified using the MIDAS software package for quantitation and statistical analysis of focal recruitment [12 ]. At least forty individual cells (2 sets of 10 cells were performed on 2 separate days) were analyzed and used to generate recruitment profiles and kinetic parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microscopic Analysis of EGFP-Tagged Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U2OS or ES-2 cells expressing either the EGFP-fused WWE domains or EGFP-fused Af1521 macrodomain variants were cultured in wells of an 8-chamber glass bottom vessel (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a density of 7×104 cells per well. After 24 hours, cells were washed twice with 1X PBS. Next, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde supplemented with Triton 100-X (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for permeabilization of the cells, and Alexa Fluor 647 phalloidin (Invitrogen) to stain filamentous actin (F-actin). Cells were incubated at 4°C for 20 minutes according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Subsequently, cells were washed once with PBS and then NucBlue Fixed Ready Probes reagent (Invitrogen) was added for 20 minutes at room temperature according to the manufacturer’s protocol to stain the nuclear compartment. Cells were washed three times with 1X PBS, and then were imaged using a Nikon A1rsi laser scanning confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

XRCC1 Recruitment Dynamics in Laser Micro-Irradiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Laser micro-irradiation experiments were performed as we described previously [33 (link)], with slight modifications. First, LN248/MSH6-KD cells (5 × 104 per well) were seeded into each well of an 8-chamber glass-bottom vessel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, #155409) and cultured overnight. They were then modified to express EGFP-tagged XRCC1 (pLV-CMV-XRCC1-EGFP-Hygro; see Supplementary Table S1) by transfection using TransIT X2 according to the manufacturer’s instructions and cultured for 48 h. Next, a Nikon A1rsi confocal microscope was used for laser micro-irradiation. Cells were then imaged with a Nikon A1rsi laser scanning confocal microscope, which is equipped with a live-cell incubation chamber (Tokai Hit, Fujinomiya, Japan) maintained at 5% CO2 and 37 °C. A 20× (NA = 0.8) non-immersion objective was used for imaging. Micro-irradiation was performed using a 405-nm laser and the stimulation time was 0.125 s at the 100% power per site. Time lapse images were collected every 15 s during a 20-min interval. MIDAS software was used for the quantitation of the focal recruitment images and the statistical analysis of focal recruitment [33 (link)]. Recruitment profiles and kinetic parameters were generated from the analysis of at least 35 individual cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!